Literature DB >> 27306720

Morphology evolution and pure red upconversion mechanism of β-NaLuF4 crystals.

Hao Lin1, Dekang Xu1, Anming Li1, Dongdong Teng1, Shenghong Yang1, Yueli Zhang1.   

Abstract

A series of β-NaLuF4 crystals were synthesized via a hydrothermal method. Hexagonal phase microdisks, microprisms, and microtubes were achieved by simply changing the amount of citric acid in the initial reaction solution. Pure red upconversion (UC) luminescence can be observed in β-NaLuF4:Yb(3+), Tm(3+), Er(3+) and Li(+) doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb(3+), 1% Tm(3+), 20% Er(3+). Based on the rate equations, we report the theoretical model about the pure red UC mechanism in Yb(3+)/Tm(3+)/Er(3+) doped system. It is proposed that the pure red UC luminescence is mainly ascribed to the energy transfer UC from Tm(3+):(3)F4 → (3)H6 to Er(3+):(4)I11/2 → (4)F9/2 and the cross-relaxation (CR) effect [Er(3+):(4)S3/2 + (4)I15/2 → (4)I9/2 + (4)I13/2] rather than the long-accepted mechanism [CR process among Er(3+):(4)F7/2 + (4)I11/2 → (4)F9/2 + (4)F9/2]. In addition, compared to the Li(+)-free counterpart, the pure red UC luminescence in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb(3+), 1% Tm(3+), 20% Er(3+) with 15 mol% Li(+) doping is enhanced by 13.7 times. This study provides a general and effective approach to obtain intense pure red UC luminescence, which can be applied to other synthetic strategies.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27306720      PMCID: PMC4910071          DOI: 10.1038/srep28051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Recently, lanthanide (Ln) doped upconversion (UC) materials have aroused extensive attention because of their potential applications in fields such as flat-panel displays, therapeutics, photovoltaics, and biological imaging123456789. Their advantages include long luminescence lifetimes, low toxicity and high photochemical stability1011121314, which make them more desirable than conventional fluorescent materials. As an important fluoride, β-NaLuF4 has excellent UC luminescence due to its high refractive index, low phonon energy, and high thermal stability, which has attracted significant interest15161718. In contrast to green and blue light, red light (600–700 nm) can deeply penetrate biotissues owing to the lack of efficient endogenous absorbers192021. Consequently, a strategy to achieve high purity of red UC luminescence will be useful for UC applications, especially for biological imaging. As is known, UC materials usually display multipeak emissions due to Ln ions have more than one metastable excited state19. Thus, avoiding the blue and green emissions and boosting the red emission are needed to obtain high pure red UC luminescence. For instance, Tan et al. reported the pure red UC emission in NaYbF4 nanocrystals doping with high Er3+ content22. Chan et al. revealed a UC mechanism in which energy transfer (ET) from Tm3+:3F4 → 3H6 to Er3+:4I11/2 → 4F9/2, leading to the population of red-emitting manifold (Er3+:4F9/2)23. Therefore, it can be concluded that high-content doping of Er3+ and low-content doping of Tm3+ can induce a tremendous increase in the red to green ratio (RGR) and ultimately pure red UC luminescence. There are three common cross-relaxation (CR) processes among Er3+ that account for the enhancement of RGR in Yb3+/Er3+ codoped system. The first CR effect is the long-accepted and most popular mechanism22242526. According to Capobianco et al.’s report26, the enhanced red UC emission was obtained owing to a CR process [Er3+:4F7/2 + 4I11/2 → 4F9/2 + 4F9/2], which directly populates the 4F9/2 state. The second CR effect was proposed by Gao et al.27, which was derived from Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I13/2 → 4F9/2 + 4I11/2, resulting in the promotion of red emission and quenching of green emission. The third CR effect was proposed by Salas et al.28, they reported that the increased red UC luminescence mainly comes from the CR process [Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I15/2 → 4I9/2 + 4I13/2], and subsequently energy transfer UC (ETU) process [I13/2 (Er3+) + 2F5/2 (Yb3+) → 4F9/2 (Er3+) + 2F7/2 (Yb3+)]. However, there is no theoretical model about the pure red UC mechanism in Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ doped system. Besides, compared to traditional phosphors, the main drawback of UC materials is their low UC luminescence efficiency. It is still a challenge to obtain the intense pure red UC luminescence, and an effective method to enhance the pure red UC emission is urgently needed. It has been proved that the doping of Li+ can greatly increase the UC luminescence intensity293031. As is known, Li+ can be easily doped into the host lattice substitutionally or interstitially owing to its small ionic radius, which would reduce the symmetry of crystal field around Ln ions, inducing the enhancement of UC emission intensity. However, there is no report on the increase of pure red UC luminescence by introducing Li+ in β-NaLuF4:Yb3+, Tm3+, Er3+. As a typical solution-based approach, the hydrothermal method has been widely applied to synthesize inorganic materials with controllable structures and morphologies3233. During the hydrothermal treatment, a series of external parameters such as the pH value, citrate ions (Cit3−) content, NaF content, reaction time and temperature may have significant effects on the morphology evolution of particles18343536. In particular, the addition of chelating agent has a great impact on the kinetics of crystal growth3738. Cit3− as a shape modifier plays a critical role in the shape evolution of the final products due to its high thermal stability and ability to form complexes with other metal ions394041. In this article, a series of β-NaLuF4 crystals were prepared via a hydrothermal method using citric acid as a chelating agent, and their pure red UC luminescence were studied. Hexagonal phase microdisks, microprisms, and microtubes were achieved by simply changing the amount of citric acid in the initial reaction solution. Importantly, pure red UC luminescence can be observed in β-NaLuF4:Yb3+, Tm3+, Er3+ and Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+. Based on the rate equations, the theoretical model about the pure red UC mechanism in Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ doped system is presented. The red UC emission of 660 nm in Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ is greatly increased compared to the Li+-free sample under 980 nm excitation at room temperature.

Results and Discussion

Morphology evolution of β-NaLuF4 crystals

Citric acid has been regarded as one of the most effective chelating agents because of its ability to regulate the morphology and dimension of the samples in the hydrothermal process42. In the present system, citric acid also plays a critical role in the morphology evolution of β-NaLuF4 crystals. Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the as-prepared β-NaLuF4 samples with different citric acid contents from 2 to 8 mmol. As can be seen, all the diffraction peaks can be well indexed to pure β-NaLuF4, which is consistent with the standard card (JCPDS 27-0726). No other impurity peaks are detected, indicating the high purity of β-NaLuF4 samples. It is worth to note that the relative intensities of (100), (110), (101) and (201) peaks display some differences from each other, implying the existence of oriented growth under different Cit3− contents. The above XRD results are supported by the corresponding SEM images, as exhibited in Fig. 2. When the adding citric acid is 2 mmol (Fig. 2a), regular hexagonal phase microdisks with an average size of 0.79 μm in height and 7.58 μm in diameter are obtained. As the citric acid content increases to 3 mmol (Fig. 2b), short hexagonal phase microprisms with uniformity and smooth surfaces are achieved. The mean height and diameter of the prisms are 2.12 μm and 8.51 μm, respectively. Further increasing the citric acid content to 8 mmol, hexagonal phase microtubes with hollow structure are presented in Fig. 2c. The tubes have an average height of 9.47 μm and an average diameter of 1.88 μm. The ratios of height to diameter (H/D ratios) are calculated to be about 0.10, 0.25, and 5.04 when the adding citric acid is 2, 3, and 8 mmol. From the above analysis, it can be concluded that the H/D ratio is increased as the citric acid content increases from 2 to 8 mmol. Based on the high anisotropic structure of β-NaLuF443, when the adding citric acid increases from 2 to 8 mmol, Cit3− absorbs onto the {0001} facets more strongly than the facets. Thus, the growth rate along [0001] direction is faster than that along direction, resulting in the morphology evolution from disks to tubes and the enhancement of H/D ratio. The hollow structure of the tubes is generated owing to the growth rate at the center is lower than that at the edges44. The corresponding schematic diagrams of β-NaLuF4 crystals under different citric acid contents are displayed in Fig. 2(d–f).
Figure 1

XRD patterns of β-NaLuF4 crystals with different citric acid contents.

(a–c) refer to 2, 3, 8 mmol, respectively. The vertical red lines are the standard profiles of β-NaLuF4 (JCPDS 27-0726).

Figure 2

SEM images (a–c) and the corresponding schematic diagrams (d–f) of β-NaLuF4 crystals with different citric acid contents: (a,d) 2 mmol, (b,e) 3 mmol, and (c,f) 8 mmol. Scale bars = 5 μm.

Pure red UC mechanism of β-NaLuF4:Yb3+, Tm3+, Er3+ crystals

A series of β-NaLuF4:Yb3+, Tm3+, Er3+ crystals were synthesized by adding 3 mmol citric acid. Figure 3 shows the UC emission spectra (normalized to Er3+ 540 nm emission) of (a) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/xEr, (b) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/0.5% Tm/xEr, and (c) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/xEr (x = 0.5, 2, 5, 10, 20%) under 980 nm excitation at room temperature. Green emissions at around 520/540 nm correspond to the transitions of Er3+:2H11/2/4S3/2 → 4I15/2. Red emissions at approximately 660 nm and 696 nm are attributed to the transition of Er3+:4F9/2 → 4I15/2 and the transition of Tm3+:3F3 → 3H6, respectively. As can be seen, compared with Tm3+-free group [Fig. 3(a)], the RGR is greatly increased in 0.5% Tm3+-group [Fig. 3(b)] and 1% Tm3+-group [Fig. 3(c)]. The maximum RGR is observed in 0.5% Tm3+ and 1% Tm3+-groups doped with 20 mol% Er3+. From the insets of Fig. 3(a–c) and Table 1, it can be clearly seen that the RGR is almost unchanged in Tm3+-free group while dramatically enhanced in 0.5% Tm3+ and 1% Tm3+-groups with the increase of Er3+ dopant content. The RGR in 0.5% Tm3+ (R/G = 43.7) and 1% Tm3+ (R/G = 49.3)-groups with 20% Er3+ doping are increased by 26 and 19 times compared to their 0.5% Er3+ doping (R/G = 1.66, 2.57). Consequently, low-content doping of Tm3+ and high-content doping of Er3+ induce great enhancement in the RGR. Figure 4 shows the pump power dependence of green and red UC emissions in 0.5% Tm3+ and 1% Tm3+-groups with 0.5%, 5% and 20% Er3+ doping under 980 nm excitation. According to the formula45: Iuc ∝ Pn, where Iuc is the output UC emission intensity, P is the infrared excitation power, n is the absorbed laser photon number when emitting an UC photon. As shown in Fig. 4(a,c), the slopes of green emission (Er3+:2H11/2/4S3/2 → 4I15/2) are 1.23, 1.40, and 1.72 in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/0.5% Tm/xEr; 1.15, 1.53, and 1.61 in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/xEr (x = 0.5, 5, 20%). The slopes of red emission (Er3+:4F9/2 → 4I15/2) are 1.22, 1.10, and 0.64 in 0.5% Tm3+-group; 1.27, 1.16, and 1.08 in 1% Tm3+-group with 0.5%, 5% and 20% Er3+ doping. On the basis of the above analysis, it can be concluded that green emission varies from one-photon process to two-photon processes, and red emission (660 nm) keeps one-photon process in 0.5% Tm3+ and 1% Tm3+-groups.
Figure 3

UC emission spectra (normalized to Er3+ 540 nm emission) of (a) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/xEr, (b) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/0.5% Tm/xEr, and (c) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/xEr (x = 0.5, 2, 5, 10, 20%) under 980 nm excitation. The insets of (a–c) show the corresponding R/G ratio as a function of Er3+ concentration.

Table 1

Summary of RGR in (a) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/xEr, (b) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/0.5% Tm/xEr, and (c) β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/xEr (x = 0.5, 2, 5, 10, 20%).

(a)R/G(b)R/G(c)R/G
20% Yb/0.5% Er5.9320% Yb/0.5% Tm/0.5% Er1.6620% Yb/1% Tm/0.5% Er2.57
20% Yb/2% Er4.1620% Yb/0.5% Tm/2% Er3.4620% Yb/1% Tm/2% Er2.93
20% Yb/5% Er3.6620% Yb/0.5% Tm/5% Er9.7020% Yb/1% Tm/5% Er10.6
20% Yb/10% Er3.2020% Yb/0.5% Tm/10% Er25.620% Yb/1% Tm/10% Er31.5
20% Yb/20% Er4.5020% Yb/0.5% Tm/20% Er43.720% Yb/1% Tm/20% Er49.3
Figure 4

Double logarithmic relationship of (a,c) green and (b,d) red UC luminescence intensities versus pump powers in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/0.5% Tm/xEr and β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/xEr (x = 0.5, 5, 20%) under 980 nm excitation.

In this paper, we built a theoretical model to have a deep understanding of the ET process in Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ doped system. We supposed 4F7/2, 2H11/2, and 4S3/2 energy levels as a same level. When the Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ system doped with low Er3+ content, CR effect between Er3+ can be neglected. The corresponding rate equations are as follows: N0, N1, N2, N2′, N3, N4, M0, M1, NYb0 and NYb1 are the population densities of the Er3+ 4I15/2, 4I13/2, 4I11/2, 4I9/2, 4F9/2, 4S3/2/2H11/2/4F7/2, Tm3+ 3H6, 3F4, Yb3+ 2F7/2 and 2F5/2 levels, respectively. ω0, ω1, ω2, ω3, and ω4 correspond to the ET rates of 2F5/2 + 4I15/2 → 2F7/2 + 4I11/2 (ET1), 2F5/2 + 4I13/2 → 2F7/2 + 4F9/2 (ET2), 2F5/2 + 4I11/2 → 2F7/2 + 4F7/2 (ET3), 4S3/2 + 3H6 → 4I9/2 + 3F4 (ET4), and 3F4 + 4I11/2 → 3H6 + 4F9/2 (ET5), respectively. ω21, ω2′2, and ω43 are multiphonon relaxation (MPR) rates from Er3+:4I11/2 → 4I13/2, 4I9/2 → 4I11/2, and 4F7/2 → 4F9/2, respectively. A3 and A4 are the spontaneous radiative probabilities of Er3+ 4F9/2 and 4S3/2/2H11/2 levels, respectively. As presented in Fig. 5, the Er3+ 4F7/2 level is populated through the ET1 + ET3 processes. Then green UC emission is generated by the MPR processes of Er3+:4F7/2 → 4S3/2/2H11/2 levels. For red UC emission (660 nm), the Er3+ 4F9/2 level is populated in two ways: (a) the MPR from Er3+ 4F7/2 level, (b) the ET4+ET5 processes. In consideration of the high Yb3+ content, many radiative and nonradiative processes can be ignored, such as the back ET process from Er3+ to Yb3+ (4I11/2 + 2F7/2 → 4I15/2 + 2F5/2), MPR processes, N1, N2 radiative emissions and so on. Under steady-state condition, the rate equations can be acquired as follows:
Figure 5

Proposed ET mechanism of green and red UC emissions in β-NaLuF4:Yb3+, Tm3+, Er3+ (with low Er3+ content).

The mechanism involves the ETU from Tm3+ to Er3+ 23.

The population density of Yb3+ 2F5/2 can be described as follows46: where σ is the absorption cross-section of Yb3+ 2F5/2 level, ρ is the pump rate of near-infrared (NIR) laser. Under steady-state condition, we get By solving the above equations, we have As can be seen from Equations (1) and (2), both red-emitting manifold N3 and green-emitting manifold N4 have linear relationships with pump power at low Er3+ dose, which are in good agreement with the experimental results shown in Fig. 4. When the Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ system doped with high Er3+ dose, pure red UC luminescence can be obtained. As is known, CR is dependent on the distance among activators46. The average distance between Er3+ reduces with the increase of Er3+ dopant dose, which would result in the enhancement of CR effect. Thus, the CR process among Er3+ plays an important role in the achievement of pure red UC luminescence. There are generally three CR processes between Er3+ that account for the increase of RGR (has been described in the section of “Introduction”), as displayed in Fig. 6. Additionally, the ET4+ET5 processes between Tm3+ and Er3+ also make a significant contribution to the high RGR. In the following sections, the above three CR effects are discussed systematically. As the Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ system doped with high Er3+ content, green UC emission can be neglected, and red UC emission (660 nm) mainly comes from two ways: (a) the CR effect among Er3+; (b) the ETU from Tm3+ to Er3+.
Figure 6

Proposed ET mechanism of red UC emission in β-NaLuF4:Yb3+, Tm3+, Er3+ (with high Er3+ content).

The mechanism involves the CR effects among Er3+ 26272846 and ETU from Tm3+ to Er3+ 23.

Theoretical model for the first CR effect

The corresponding rate equations are as follows: ωC1 is the CR rate for [Er3+:4F7/2 + 4I11/2 → 4F9/2 + 4F9/2 (CR1)]. CR1 is the long-accepted and most popular mechanism to account for the enhancement of RGR in Yb3+/Er3+ codoped system22242526. By solving the equations under steady-state excitation, we get As can be seen from Equation (5), the green-emitting level N4 does not have quasi-quadratic relationship with pump power, which is not corresponding to Fig. 4(a,c) where n are 1.72 and 1.61 in 0.5% Tm3+ and 1% Tm3+-groups at high content (20 mol%) of Er3+ doping, indicating CR1 is not suitable for explaining the experimental results. Consequently, CR1 has nothing to do with the increase of red emission (660 nm) at high Er3+ content in Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ doped system.

Theoretical model for the second CR effect

The corresponding rate equations are as follows: ωC2 is the CR rate for [Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I13/2 → 4F9/2 + 4I11/2 (CR2)]. By solving the equations under steady-state condition, we have As can be seen from Equations (7) and (8), red-emitting manifold N3 and green-emitting manifold N4 have linear and quasi-quadratic relationships with pump power at high Er3+ content, which correspond to the relevant results in Fig. 4. The power dependence of RGR for β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/20% Er is exhibited in Fig. 7(a). It can be clearly seen that the RGR is decreased with the increase of pump power. The ratio of N3 to N4 shows the inverse proportional relationship to pump power [Equation (9)], which is in accordance with the result in Fig. 7(a). From the above analysis, it can be deduced that CR2 maybe makes a contribution to the high RGR when the Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ system doped with high Er3+ dose.
Figure 7

(a) Power dependence of R/G ratio for β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/20% Er, and (b) Er3+ concentration dependence of NIR/G ratio for β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/xEr under 980 nm excitation. NIR emission corresponds to the 4I13/2 → 4I15/2 transition of Er3+.

Theoretical model for the third CR effect

The corresponding rate equations are as follows: ωC3 is the CR rate for [Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I15/2 → 4I9/2 + 4I13/2 (CR3)], and red UC emission (660 nm) is obtained by the subsequent ETU process [I13/2 (Er3+) + 2F5/2 (Yb3+) → 4F9/2 (Er3+) + 2F7/2 (Yb3+)]. By solving the equations under steady-state condition, we get As can be seen from Equation (10), red-emitting level N3 ~ aρ + bρ2, which is corresponding to the relevant results in Fig. 4(b,d) when we suppose the parameter “b” is close to zero. Equations (11) and (12) show the green-emitting manifold N4 and ratio of N3 to N4 have quasi-quadratic and inverse proportional relationships with pump power, which are in good agreement with the results shown in Figs 4(a,c) and 7(a), respectively. Thus, CR3 can be used to explain the experimental results. On the basis of the above analysis, it can be concluded that both CR2 and CR3 maybe are the appropriate ET mechanisms for the achievement of pure red UC luminescence at high Er3+ content in Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ doped system. According to our experimental results, there are three reasons to prove that CR3 (Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I15/2 → 4I9/2 + 4I13/2) is the main CR effect for the population process of 4F9/2 manifold. First, the ratio of NIR to green (NGR) is enhanced with the increase of Er3+ content in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/xEr (NIR emission corresponds to the 4I13/2 → 4I15/2 transition of Er3+), as presented in Fig. 7(b). The increasing NGR indicates that the population of Er3+ 4I13/2 level becomes larger and larger compared to Er3+ 4S3/2/2H11/2 levels. As is known, the probability of MPR from 4I11/2 to 4I13/2 is quite low due to the low phonon energy in our system. Thus, the increasing NGR is mainly ascribed to CR3. Second, the decay curves of the 4I13/2 → 4I15/2 transition of Er3+ in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/0.5% Er and β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/20% Er are shown in Fig. 8. The decay lifetime was calculated based on the function: , where I(t) is the emission intensity at time t, and IP is the peak intensity in the decay curve. The calculation results show that τ0.5% Er = 1.40 ms and τ20% Er = 0.55 ms. The energy transfer efficiency (ETE) can be evaluated by the following expression: η = 1 − τ/τ, the calculation result shows that ηETE = 60.71%. With the increase of Er3+ dose, the enhanced red UC emission (660 nm) mainly comes from the enhancement of CR effect between Er3+ in Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ doped system. Thus, it is reasonable to consider that the probability of CR3 is 60.71%. Third, the ET process of CR2 (Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I13/2 → 4F9/2 + 4I11/2) needs the population process of Er3+ 4I13/2 manifold, which is mainly dependent on the ET process of CR3 (Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I15/2 → 4I9/2 + 4I13/2). Therefore, the CR3 process is required before the CR2 process, resulting in the leading role of CR3 in the CR effects.
Figure 8

Decay curves of the 4I13/2 → 4I15/2 transition of Er3+ in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/0.5% Er and β-NaLuF4:20% Yb/1% Tm/20% Er.

It can be concluded that the pure red UC luminescence is mainly ascribed to the ETU from Tm3+:3F4 → 3H6 to Er3+:4I11/2 → 4F9/2 and the CR effect [Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I15/2 → 4I9/2 + 4I13/2 (CR3)] rather than the long-accepted and most popular mechanism (CR1 process among Er3+:4F7/2 + 4I11/2 → 4F9/2 + 4F9/2).

Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ crystals

A series of Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ crystals were synthesized by adding 3 mmol citric acid. Figure 9 presents the XRD patterns (a) and the main diffraction peak (b) of different Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ crystals. As shown in Fig. 9(a), all the diffraction peaks of the products can be indexed as pure β-NaLuF4 (JCPDS 27-0726) even the Li+ concentration increases up to 20 mol%, indicating that Li+ doping has no influence on the crystal structure of the products. The corresponding UC emission spectra of the products under 980 nm excitation are shown in Fig. 10. As can be seen, the pure red UC luminescence is greatly enhanced after Li+ doping. Compared to the Li+-free sample, the pure red UC luminescence in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ with 15 mol% Li+ doping is increased by 13.7 times. This phenomenon is mainly caused by the asymmetric surrounding environment around Ln ions after Li+ doping. Figure 9(b) exhibits that the main diffraction peak moves to the larger angles when the Li+ concentration is from 0 to 15 mol%, whereas shifts in reverse as the Li+ concentration increases up to 20 mol%. According to Bragg’s law 2dsinθ = nλ, where d represents the interplanar distance, θ represents the diffraction angle, and λ represents the diffraction wavelength. When d decreases, θ increases; when d increases, θ decreases. As is displayed in Fig. 11(a), Na+ and Ln3+ occupy the same lattice site in β-NaLuF4 lattice. When the Li+ is introduced into the host lattice, it can replace Na+ (d decreases, θ increases, 0 < Li+ concentration ≤15 mol%) [Fig. 11(b)] or occupy the interstitial site (d increases, θ decreases, 15 < Li+ concentration ≤20 mol%) [Fig. 11(c)] due to its small ionic radius, leading to the contraction or expansion of unit cell. Both the contraction and expansion of unit cell would reduce the symmetry of crystal field around Ln ions, inducing the sharp increase of pure red UC luminescence intensity293031. The strongest UC luminescence intensity is acquired in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ with 15 mol% Li+ doping, which is attributed to the most asymmetric surrounding environment around Ln ions, as shown in Fig. 9(b).
Figure 9

XRD patterns (a) and the main diffraction peak (b) of different Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ crystals. The vertical red lines are the standard profiles of β-NaLuF4 (JCPDS 27-0726).

Figure 10

UC emission spectra of β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ crystals doped with different Li+ contents under 980 nm excitation.

Figure 11

Crystal structure of β-NaLuF4 (a); possible changes in β-NaLuF4 crystal lattice after Li+ doping: substitution by Li+ (b), and interstitial occupation by Li+ (c).

Conclusion

In summary, hexagonal phase microdisks, microprisms, and microtubes were achieved by simply changing the amount of citric acid in the initial reaction solution. Pure red UC luminescence can be observed in β-NaLuF4:Yb3+, Tm3+, Er3+ and Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+. We prove that the low-content doping of Tm3+ and high-content doping of Er3+ induce great enhancement in the RGR. The RGR in 0.5% Tm3+ (R/G = 43.7) and 1% Tm3+ (R/G = 49.3)-groups with 20% Er3+ doping are increased by 26 and 19 times compared to their 0.5% Er3+ doping (R/G = 1.66, 2.57). Green emission varies from one-photon process to two-photon processes, and red emission (660 nm) keeps one-photon process in 0.5% Tm3+ and 1% Tm3+-groups. Based on the rate equations, we report the theoretical model about the pure red UC mechanism in Yb3+/Tm3+/Er3+ doped system. It is proposed that the pure red UC luminescence is mainly ascribed to the ETU from Tm3+:3F4 → 3H6 to Er3+:4I11/2 → 4F9/2 and the CR effect [Er3+:4S3/2 + 4I15/2 → 4I9/2 + 4I13/2 (CR3)] rather than the long-accepted and most popular mechanism (CR1 process among Er3+:4F7/2 + 4I11/2 → 4F9/2 + 4F9/2). Additionally, compared to the Li+-free sample, the pure red UC luminescence in β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ with 15 mol% Li+ doping is enhanced by 13.7 times. The results suggest that the enhanced pure red UC luminescence in Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ may have potential applications in flat-panel displays, solid-state lasers and light-emitting diodes. Besides, this study provides a general and effective approach to obtain intense pure red UC luminescence, which can be applied to other synthetic strategies to prepare many types of nanocrystals with high purity of red UC luminescence, making it suitable for the future bioapplications.

Methods

Chemicals

All of the chemicals are of analytical grade and used as received without further purification. 1 M of Lu(NO3)3, 0.5 M of Yb(NO3)3, 0.1 M of Er(NO3)3, and 0.1 M of Tm(NO3)3 stock solutions were prepared by dissolving the corresponding rare earth oxide (99.99%) in dilute nitric acid (30%) at elevated temperature.

Preparation

A series of β-NaLuF4 crystals with different morphologies were synthesized via a hydrothermal method using citric acid as a chelating agent. In a typical procedure, (2 mmol/3 mmol/8 mmol) of citric acid (2 M, 1 mL/1.5 mL/4 mL), 5 mmol of NaOH (4 M, 1.25 mL) and 10 mL of deionized water were mixed and stirred for 10 min. Then 1 mmol of Ln(NO3)3 [1 mmol of Lu(NO3)3 (1 M, 1 mL)] was added to the above mixture and then stirred for 30 min to form the RE-Cit3− complex. Subsequently, an aqueous solution containing 8 mmol of NaF (1 M, 8 mL) and (9 mL/8.5 mL/6 mL) of deionized water was added into the chelated RE-Cit3- complex to form a colloidal suspension and kept stirring for another 30 min. Finally, the suspension was transferred into a 50 mL-Teflon vessel, sealed in an autoclave and maintained at 200 °C for 10 h before cooling down naturally. The final products were separated by centrifugation, washed several times with ethanol and deionized water, then dried in air at 60 °C for 12 h. β-NaLuF4: 20% Yb3+, (0%/0.5%/1%)Tm3+, (0.5%/2%/5%/10%/20%)Er3+ crystals and (8%/15%/20%)Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ crystals were prepared by a similar process (Cit3− = 3 mmol) under the same experimental conditions. In particular, as for (8%/15%/20%)Li+ doped β-NaLuF4:20% Yb3+, 1% Tm3+, 20% Er3+ crystals, after the formation of RE-Cit3− complex, a mixture containing (0.64 mmol/1.2 mmol/1.6 mmol) of LiNO3 (1 M, 0.64 mL/1.2 mL/1.6 mL), (7.36 mmol/6.8 mmol/6.4 mmol) of NaF (1 M, 7.36 mL/6.8 mL/6.4 mL), (0.32 mmol/0.6 mmol/0.8 mmol) of NH4HF2 (1 M, 0.32 mL/0.6 mL/0.8 mL) and (6 mL/5.5 mL/5.5 mL) of deionized water were added into the chelated RE-Cit3− complex to form the colloidal suspension.

Characterization

The phase and structure of the as-prepared products were confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns using the D-Max 2200VPC XRD from Rigaku Company. Morphologies and grain sizes were verified by using an Oxford Quanta 400F Thermal Field Emission environmental Scanning Electronic Microscope (SEM). UC photoluminescence spectra were acquired on the Edinburgh Instrument FLSP920 steady-state fluorescence spectrometer equipped with a 2 W 980 nm laser diode. The spot size of the 980 nm laser on the samples is about 0.05 cm2.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Lin, H. et al. Morphology evolution and pure red upconversion mechanism of β-NaLuF4 crystals. Sci. Rep. 6, 28051; doi: 10.1038/srep28051 (2016).
  21 in total

1.  Enhanced red emission from GdF3:Yb3+,Er3+ upconversion nanocrystals by Li+ doping and their application for bioimaging.

Authors:  Wenyan Yin; Lina Zhao; Liangjun Zhou; Zhanjun Gu; Xiaoxiao Liu; Gan Tian; Shan Jin; Liang Yan; Wenlu Ren; Gengmei Xing; Yuliang Zhao
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 5.236

2.  Li+ ion doping: an approach for improving the crystallinity and upconversion emissions of NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+ nanoparticles.

Authors:  Chengzhou Zhao; Xianggui Kong; Xiaomin Liu; Langping Tu; Fei Wu; Youlin Zhang; Kai Liu; Qinghui Zeng; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Ambient large-scale template-mediated synthesis of high-aspect ratio single-crystalline, chemically doped rare-earth phosphate nanowires for bioimaging.

Authors:  Fen Zhang; Stanislaus S Wong
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Facile preparation of multifunctional upconversion nanoprobes for multimodal imaging and dual-targeted photothermal therapy.

Authors:  Liang Cheng; Kai Yang; Yonggang Li; Jianhua Chen; Chao Wang; Mingwang Shao; Shuit-Tong Lee; Zhuang Liu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Tuning of structure and enhancement of upconversion luminescence in NaLuF4:Yb(3+),Ho(3+) crystals.

Authors:  Hao Lin; Dekang Xu; Anming Li; Dongdong Teng; Shenghong Yang; Yueli Zhang
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Gadolinium oxide ultranarrow nanorods as multimodal contrast agents for optical and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gautom Kumar Das; Boon Chin Heng; Sui-Choon Ng; Tim White; Joachim Say Chye Loo; Loyola D'Silva; Parasuraman Padmanabhan; Kishore K Bhakoo; Subramanian Tamil Selvan; Timothy Thatt Yang Tan
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  Synthesis of NaYF4 microcrystals with different morphologies and enhanced up-conversion luminescence properties.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Shili Gai; Na Niu; Fei He; Piaoping Yang
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.676

8.  Concentrating and recycling energy in lanthanide codopants for efficient and spectrally pure emission: the case of NaYF4:Er3+/Tm3+ upconverting nanocrystals.

Authors:  Emory M Chan; Daniel J Gargas; P James Schuck; Delia J Milliron
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Recent advances in the chemistry of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Xiaogang Liu
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 10.  Enhancing luminescence in lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sanyang Han; Renren Deng; Xiaoji Xie; Xiaogang Liu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improving Optical Temperature Sensing Performance of Er3+ Doped Y2O3 Microtubes via Co-doping and Controlling Excitation Power.

Authors:  Xiangfu Wang; Ye Wang; Jose Marques-Hueso; Xiaohong Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Synthesis of Multicolor Core/Shell NaLuF₄:Yb3+/Ln3+@CaF₂ Upconversion Nanocrystals.

Authors:  Hui Li; Shuwei Hao; Chunhui Yang; Guanying Chen
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.076

3.  Near infrared emission properties of Er doped cubic sesquioxides in the second/third biological windows.

Authors:  Daniel Avram; Ion Tiseanu; Bogdan S Vasile; Mihaela Florea; Carmen Tiseanu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Recent Progress of Rare-Earth Doped Upconversion Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Optimization, and Applications.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhu; Jing Zhang; Jinliang Liu; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 16.806

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.