Daniele Cazzato1, Marco Castori1, Raffaella Lombardi1, Francesca Caravello1, Eleonora Dalla Bella1, Antonio Petrucci1, Paola Grammatico1, Chiara Dordoni1, Marina Colombi1, Giuseppe Lauria2. 1. From 3rd Neurology Unit and Skin Biopsy (D.C., R.L., F.C., E.D.B., G.L.), Peripheral Neuropathy and Neuropathic Pain Laboratory, IRCCS Foundation "Carlo Besta" Neurological Institute, Milan; Unit of Medical Genetics (M.C., P.G.), Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Neurology Unit (A.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome; and Division of Biology and Genetics (C.D., M.C.), Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Italy. 2. From 3rd Neurology Unit and Skin Biopsy (D.C., R.L., F.C., E.D.B., G.L.), Peripheral Neuropathy and Neuropathic Pain Laboratory, IRCCS Foundation "Carlo Besta" Neurological Institute, Milan; Unit of Medical Genetics (M.C., P.G.), Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Neurology Unit (A.P.), San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome; and Division of Biology and Genetics (C.D., M.C.), Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Italy. glauria@istituto-besta.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the involvement of small nerve fibers in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with EDS underwent clinical, neurophysiologic, and skin biopsy assessment. We recorded sensory symptoms and signs and evaluated presence and severity of neuropathic pain according to the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) and ID Pain questionnaires and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Sensory action potential amplitude and conduction velocity of sural nerve was recorded. Skin biopsy was performed at distal leg and intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) obtained and referred to published sex- and age-adjusted normative reference values. RESULTS: Our cohort included 20 adults with joint hypermobility syndrome/hypermobility EDS, 3 patients with vascular EDS, and 1 patient with classic EDS. All except one patient had neuropathic pain according to DN4 and ID Pain questionnaires and reported 7 or more symptoms at the Small Fiber Neuropathy Symptoms Inventory Questionnaire. Pain intensity was moderate (NRS ≥4 and <7) in 8 patients and severe (NRS ≥7) in 11 patients. Sural nerve conduction study was normal in all patients. All patients showed a decrease of IENFD consistent with the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy (SFN), regardless of the EDS type. CONCLUSIONS: SFN is a common feature in adults with EDS. Skin biopsy could be considered an additional diagnostic tool to investigate pain manifestations in EDS.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the involvement of small nerve fibers in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with EDS underwent clinical, neurophysiologic, and skin biopsy assessment. We recorded sensory symptoms and signs and evaluated presence and severity of neuropathic pain according to the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) and ID Pain questionnaires and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Sensory action potential amplitude and conduction velocity of sural nerve was recorded. Skin biopsy was performed at distal leg and intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) obtained and referred to published sex- and age-adjusted normative reference values. RESULTS: Our cohort included 20 adults with joint hypermobility syndrome/hypermobility EDS, 3 patients with vascular EDS, and 1 patient with classic EDS. All except one patient had neuropathic pain according to DN4 and ID Pain questionnaires and reported 7 or more symptoms at the Small Fiber Neuropathy Symptoms Inventory Questionnaire. Pain intensity was moderate (NRS ≥4 and <7) in 8 patients and severe (NRS ≥7) in 11 patients. Sural nerve conduction study was normal in all patients. All patients showed a decrease of IENFD consistent with the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy (SFN), regardless of the EDS type. CONCLUSIONS: SFN is a common feature in adults with EDS. Skin biopsy could be considered an additional diagnostic tool to investigate pain manifestations in EDS.
Authors: G Lauria; S T Hsieh; O Johansson; W R Kennedy; J M Leger; S I Mellgren; M Nolano; I S J Merkies; M Polydefkis; A G Smith; C Sommer; J Valls-Solé Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Mayienne Bakkers; Catharina G Faber; Janneke G J Hoeijmakers; Giuseppe Lauria; Ingemar S J Merkies Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Inge De Wandele; Patrick Calders; Wim Peersman; Steven Rimbaut; Tine De Backer; Fransiska Malfait; Anne De Paepe; Lies Rombaut Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Amanda J Miller; Lauren E Stiles; Timothy Sheehan; Rebecca Bascom; Howard P Levy; Clair A Francomano; Amy C Arnold Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Cortney Gensemer; Randall Burks; Steven Kautz; Daniel P Judge; Mark Lavallee; Russell A Norris Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 3.780
Authors: Delfien Syx; Rachel E Miller; Alia M Obeidat; Phuong B Tran; Robin Vroman; Zoë Malfait; Richard J Miller; Fransiska Malfait; Anne-Marie Malfait Journal: Pain Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 7.926