Literature DB >> 27306355

[Communication preferences of patients with prostate cancer : Preferences regarding the communication of bad news of patients with prostate cancer in Germany-results of an anonymous patient survey].

A S Merseburger1, M W Kramer2, K Scheithe3, C Colling4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The communication of bad medical news represents a burdening situation for both patients and physicians which may lead to hurdles in their communication. The questionnaire Measure of Patients' Preferences (MPP-D, validated German translation) was developed to investigate patients' preferences regarding the communication of bad news.
OBJECTIVES: The preferences regarding the communication of bad news among patients with prostate cancer was assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Anonymous survey, where approximately 70 office-based urologists were asked to distribute the MPP-D questionnaire to about 20 of their patients with prostate cancer. In addition, information on social demographics was retrieved in order to investigate the influence on communication preferences.
RESULTS: In total, 709 questionnaires were evaluated (>50 % return). The majority of patients had clear preferences concerning privacy of the setting, completeness, and unambiguity of information provided and assessment of their subjective information needs. Larger individual differences were observed regarding preferences for emotional support offered by the physician and involvement of family which was also influenced by age and education of the patients.
CONCLUSION: This is the first large, multicenter survey of prostate cancer patients in Germany regarding their preferences for communication of bad news. The results confirm previous reports on the importance of cultural affiliation, age, and education as influencing factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient preference; Patient survey; Physician-patient communication; Quality of life; Questionnaire

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27306355     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-016-0154-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  22 in total

Review 1.  Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.

Authors:  Donald J Kiesler; Stephen M Auerbach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-12-20

2.  Breaking bad news: experiences and preferences of advanced cancer patients at a Portuguese oncology centre.

Authors:  Ferraz Gonçalves; Agata Marques; Sónia Rocha; Pedro Leitão; Teresa Mesquita; Susana Moutinho
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Shared Decision Making and the Use of Decision Aids.

Authors:  Martin Härter; Angela Buchholz; Jennifer Nicolai; Katrin Reuter; Fely Komarahadi; Levente Kriston; Birgit Kallinowski; Wolfgang Eich; Christiane Bieber
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Japanese cancer patients' communication style preferences when receiving bad news.

Authors:  Maiko Fujimori; Patricia A Parker; Tatsuo Akechi; Yuji Sakano; Walter F Baile; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior.

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Breaking bad news: a Chinese perspective.

Authors:  C Y Tse; Alice Chong; S Y Fok
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 7.  Preferences of cancer patients regarding communication of bad news: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Maiko Fujimori; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Patients' preference to hear cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Mohammad Arbabi; Ava Rozdar; Mohammad Taher; Maryam Shirzad; Mohsen Arjmand; Sahar Ansari; Mohammad Reza Mohammadi
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03

9.  Nurses' perspectives on breaking bad news to patients and their families: a qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Abbas Abbaszadeh; Seyyedeh Roghayeh Ehsani; Jamal Begjani; Mohammad Akbari Kaji; Fatemeh Nemati Dopolani; Amir Nejati; Esmaeil Mohammadnejad
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 10.  Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids.

Authors:  Kirsten J McCaffery; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sian K Smith; David Rovner; Don Nutbeam; Marla L Clayman; Karen Kelly-Blake; Michael S Wolf; Stacey L Sheridan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.