AIMS: We investigated the applicability of the Ventricular Capture Control (VCC) and Atrial Capture Control (ACC) algorithms for automatic management of cardiac stimulation featured by Biotronik pacemakers in a broad, unselected population of pacemaker recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ventricular Capture Control and Atrial Capture Control were programmed to work at a maximum adapted output voltage as 4.8 V in consecutive recipients of Biotronik pacemakers. Ambulatory threshold measurements were made 1 and 12 months after pacemaker implant/replacement in all possible pacing/sensing configurations, and were compared with manual measurements. Among 542 patients aged 80 (73-85) years, 382 had a pacemaker implant and 160 a pacemaker replacement. Ventricular Capture Control could work at long term in 97% of patients irrespectively of pacing indication, lead type, and lead service life, performance being superior with discordant pacing/sensing configurations. Atrial Capture Control could work in 93% of patients at 4.8 V maximum adapted voltage and at any pulse width, regardless of pacing indication, lead type, and service life. At 12-month follow-up, a ventricular threshold increase ≥1.5 V had occurred in 4.4% of patients uneventfully owing to VCC functioning. Projected pacemaker longevity at 1 month was strongly correlated with the 12-month estimate, and exceeded 13 years in >60% of patients. CONCLUSION: These algorithms for automatic management of pacing output ensure patient safety in the event of a huge increase of pacing threshold, while enabling maximization of battery longevity. Their applicability is quite broad in an unselected pacemaker population irrespectively of lead choice and service of life. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: We investigated the applicability of the Ventricular Capture Control (VCC) and Atrial Capture Control (ACC) algorithms for automatic management of cardiac stimulation featured by Biotronik pacemakers in a broad, unselected population of pacemaker recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ventricular Capture Control and Atrial Capture Control were programmed to work at a maximum adapted output voltage as 4.8 V in consecutive recipients of Biotronik pacemakers. Ambulatory threshold measurements were made 1 and 12 months after pacemaker implant/replacement in all possible pacing/sensing configurations, and were compared with manual measurements. Among 542 patients aged 80 (73-85) years, 382 had a pacemaker implant and 160 a pacemaker replacement. Ventricular Capture Control could work at long term in 97% of patients irrespectively of pacing indication, lead type, and lead service life, performance being superior with discordant pacing/sensing configurations. Atrial Capture Control could work in 93% of patients at 4.8 V maximum adapted voltage and at any pulse width, regardless of pacing indication, lead type, and service life. At 12-month follow-up, a ventricular threshold increase ≥1.5 V had occurred in 4.4% of patients uneventfully owing to VCC functioning. Projected pacemaker longevity at 1 month was strongly correlated with the 12-month estimate, and exceeded 13 years in >60% of patients. CONCLUSION: These algorithms for automatic management of pacing output ensure patient safety in the event of a huge increase of pacing threshold, while enabling maximization of battery longevity. Their applicability is quite broad in an unselected pacemaker population irrespectively of lead choice and service of life. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.