| Literature DB >> 27305900 |
Benjamin M C Swift1, Jonathan N Huxley2, Karren M Plain3, Douglas J Begg3, Kumudika de Silva3, Auriol C Purdie3, Richard J Whittington3, Catherine E D Rees4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disseminated infection and bacteraemia is an underreported and under-researched aspect of Johne's disease. This is mainly due to the time it takes for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) to grow and lack of sensitivity of culture. Viable MAP cells can be detected in the blood of cattle suffering from Johne's disease within 48 h using peptide-mediated magnetic separation (PMMS) followed by bacteriophage amplification. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the first detection of MAP in the blood of experimentally exposed cattle using the PMMS-bacteriophage assay and to compare these results with the immune response of the animal based on serum ELISA and shedding of MAP by faecal culture.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteraemia; Bacteriophage; Blood test; Detection method; Johne’s disease; Mycobacteria; Paratuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27305900 PMCID: PMC4910302 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0728-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Results from the PMMS-phage assay, faecal culture, faecal PCR and serum ELISA for sub-clinical, experimentally exposed cattle to MAP
| Results | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Breed | MAP exposure statusa | PMMS-Phage assayb | Faecal culture | Faecal PCRc | Serum Ab ELISA (%)d |
| 1 | Holstein | Control | - (0) | - | - | 1.00 |
| 2 | Holstein | Control | - (0) | - | - | 29.34 |
| 3 | Holstein | Control | - (2) | - | - | 3.85 |
| 4 | Holstein | Control | - (0) | - | - | 5.92 |
| 5 | Holstein | Control | - (0) | - | - | 5.42 |
| 6 | Holstein | Control | - (0) | - | - | 3.14 |
| 7 | Holstein | Control | - (0) | - | - | 17.49 |
| 8 | Holstein | Control | - (0) | - | - | 10.49 |
| 9 | Red/Holstein | Control | - (0) | - | - | 3.50 |
| 10 | Red/Holstein | Control | - (3) | - | - | 4.57 |
| 11 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) | - | - | 2.57 |
| 12 | Holstein | Inoculated |
| - | * | 3.28 |
| 13 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) | - | - | 5.00 |
| 14 | Holstein | Inoculated | #e | #e | #e | #e |
| 15 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (5) | - | - | 14.49 |
| 16 | Holstein | Inoculated |
| - | - | 3.28 |
| 17 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) |
|
| 48.68 |
| 18 | Holstein | Inoculated |
| - | - | 8.57 |
| 19 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) | - | - | 6.21 |
| 20 | Holstein | Inoculated |
| - | - | 35.62 |
| 21 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (2) | - | - | 12.63 |
| 22 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) | - | - | 3.50 |
| 23 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) |
|
| 118.77 |
| 24 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) | - | - | 6.50 |
| 25 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) | - | * | 4.64 |
| 26 | Red/Holstein | Inoculated |
| - | - | 5.21 |
| 27 | Holstein | Inoculated |
| - | * | 41.11 |
| 28 | Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) | - | - | 2.00 |
| 29 | Red/Holstein | Inoculated |
| - | - | 13.28 |
| 30 | Red/Holstein | Inoculated | - (0) | - | * | 1.50 |
aInoculated – animals experimentally exposed to MAP; Control – animals not
exposed to MAP
b+/- indicates result of combined PMMS-phage –PCR assay. Plaque numbers
for each sample given in brackets
c* indicates MAP DNA was detected but the quantity detected was below the cut-point for a positive result [16]
dSerum Ab ELISA (IDEXX); Positive value > 55 %, suspected value 45–55 %
e# Animal 14 was culled due to other illness unrelated to Johne’s disease before sample collection
Efficiency of phage-PMMS method in isolating and detecting MAP cells compared to MPN
| Number of MAP Cells | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MPN | Number of Plaques | ||
| 104 | TNTC | TNTC | TNTC |
| 103 | 88 | 52 | 79 |
| 102 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| 101 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MPN most probable number method for determining number of MAP cells [22]
TNTC too numerous to count
Fig. 1Reproducibility of detecting MAP from whole blood using PMMS and from PBMCs. Figure show the reproducibility of detecting viable MAP cells using paired samples tested independently with the phage assay using the PMMS to isolate the MAP cells from whole blood (a) or detecting the MAP cells with the phage assays directly from PBMCs isolated from sheep blood (b)