Literature DB >> 27305417

AMBULATORY LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IS SAFE AND COST-EFFECTIVE: a Brazilian single center experience.

Uirá Fernandes Teixeira1, Marcos Bertozzi Goldoni1, Mayara Christ Machry1, Pedro Ney Ceccon1, Paulo Roberto Ott Fontes1, Fábio Luiz Waechter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for gallstone disease, and has been perfomed as an outpatient surgery in many Institutions over the last few years.
OBJECTIVE: - This is a retrospective study of a single center in Brazil, that aims to analyze the outcomes of 200 cases of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by the same Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary team, evaluating the safety and cost-effectiveness of the method.
METHODS: - Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively analyzed; some of them underwent additional procedures, as liver biopsies and abdominal hernias repair.
RESULTS: - From a total of 200 cases, the outpatient surgery protocol could not be carried out in 22 (11%). Twenty one (95.5%) patients remained hospitalized for 1 day and 1 (4.5%) patient remained hospitalized for 2 days. From the 178 patients who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 3 (1.7 %) patients returned to the emergency room before the review appointment. Hospital cost was on average 35% lower for the ambulatory group.
CONCLUSION: - With appropriate selection criteria, ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible, safe and effective; readmission rate is low, as well as complications related to the method. Cost savings and patient satisfaction support its adoption. Other studies are necessary to recommend this procedure as standard practice in Brazil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27305417     DOI: 10.1590/S0004-28032016000200010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0004-2803


  6 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review.

Authors:  Conor Melly; Gearoid McGeehan; Niall O'Connor; Alison Johnston; Gary Bass; Shahin Mohseni; Claire Donohoe; Magda Bucholc; Michael Sugrue
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Effects of Gabapentinoids Premedication on Shoulder Pain and Rehabilitation Quality after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Pregabalin versus Gabapentin.

Authors:  Mohamed Said Nakhli; Mohamed Kahloul; Chawki Jebali; Walid Frigui; Walid Naija
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 3.  The Safety of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Day Surgery Unit Comparing with That in the Inpatient Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Xiong; Ming Li; Ming Wang; Shu Zhang; Qin Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Feasibility of Routine Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Brazil.

Authors:  Júlio Cezar Uili Coelho; Giuliano Ohde Dalledone; Eduardo Lopes Martins Filho; Eduardo José Brommelstroet Ramos; Marco Aurélio Roeder da Costa; Omar O H M de Loyola E Silva
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015-2017.

Authors:  Benjamin Clapp; Carlos Lodeiro; Christopher Dodoo; Ginger Coleman; Babak Sadri; Ellen Wicker; Ira L Swinney; Robert Cullen; Alan Tyroch
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Synchronous biliary gallstones and colorectal cancer: A single center analysis.

Authors:  Narcis Octavian Zarnescu; Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu; Ioana Dumitrascu; Alexandru Chirca; Nicoleta Sanda; Andreea Iliesiu; Radu Costea
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.