Tatiana Aboulafia-Brakha1,2,3, Radek Ptak1,2,3. 1. a Division of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences , Geneva University Hospitals , Switzerland. 2. b Laboratory of Cognitive Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences , Medical School. 3. c Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences , University of Geneva , Geneva , Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of an anger management group programme for patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) on self-reported anger and to identify specific effects of intervention components at different time-points. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six participants with ABI were randomized, 24 started the programme and 19 completed it. DESIGN: A paired-randomization was held following the first baseline (T0) and a second baseline (T1) was held several weeks later. One group (n = 8) started with an 8-week anger management programme followed by a 4-week intervention focusing on the psychosocial impact of brain injury. This order was reversed in the other group (n = 11). Assessment was carried-out every 4 weeks (T1-T4) during the 12-week intervention period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Aggression Questionnaire-12, The State-Trait Anger and Expression Inventory-2 and The Multidimensional Anger Reaction Scale. RESULTS:Anger levels did not significantly change between T0 and T1, but decreased significantly at T4. Adaptive anger coping strategies also increased following intervention. Inwardly expressed anger decreased following the anger management programme compared to the psychosocial adjustment programme. CONCLUSIONS: Group psychotherapy may improve parameters of anger management in patients with ABI. However, specific effects of different components of the anger management programme merit further investigation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of an anger management group programme for patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) on self-reported anger and to identify specific effects of intervention components at different time-points. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six participants with ABI were randomized, 24 started the programme and 19 completed it. DESIGN: A paired-randomization was held following the first baseline (T0) and a second baseline (T1) was held several weeks later. One group (n = 8) started with an 8-week anger management programme followed by a 4-week intervention focusing on the psychosocial impact of brain injury. This order was reversed in the other group (n = 11). Assessment was carried-out every 4 weeks (T1-T4) during the 12-week intervention period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Aggression Questionnaire-12, The State-Trait Anger and Expression Inventory-2 and The Multidimensional Anger Reaction Scale. RESULTS: Anger levels did not significantly change between T0 and T1, but decreased significantly at T4. Adaptive anger coping strategies also increased following intervention. Inwardly expressed anger decreased following the anger management programme compared to the psychosocial adjustment programme. CONCLUSIONS: Group psychotherapy may improve parameters of anger management in patients with ABI. However, specific effects of different components of the anger management programme merit further investigation.