Literature DB >> 27304515

Safety and Quality of 1.5-T MRI in Patients With Conventional and MRI-Conditional Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices After Implementation of a Standardized Protocol.

Juan C Camacho1, Courtney Coursey Moreno1, Anand D Shah2, Pardeep K Mittal1, Andenet Mengistu2, Michael S Lloyd2, Mikhael F El-Chami2, Stamatios Lerakis1,2, Amit M Saindane1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and diagnostic utility of 1.5-T MRI examinations of individuals with conventional and MRI-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with a CIED who were referred for MRI were evaluated by radiologists and cardiac electrophysiologists for study participation. CIED interrogation was performed immediately before and after MRI, and cardiac telemetry monitoring was performed during MRI. CIED programming changes, malfunctions, and intraprocedural events were documented. Whether diagnostic questions were answered and whether artifacts related to the CIED were present and negatively affected image interpretation were recorded.
RESULTS: One hundred thirteen MRI examinations were performed for 104 patients with CIEDs (74 pacemakers [60 conventional, 14 MRI conditional]; 39 implantable cardiac defibrillators). Device reprogramming was required before MRI for 62.8% of studies (71/113). No significant changes in lead parameters were noted during or after MRI. Electromagnetic noise was detected on at least one lead in 7.1% of studies. Three patients reported transient symptoms (one case each of heating at the pocket site, tingling at the pocket site, and palpitations). All images were considered diagnostic for the original clinical query. Artifacts related to CIEDs were described in 3.5% of MRI reports (4/113) and were present only when the pulse generator was included in the FOV. CIED-related artifacts limited evaluation of tissues immediately adjacent to the pulse generator.
CONCLUSION: Establishment of a multidisciplinary work flow allows individuals with conventional and MRI-conditional CIEDs to safely undergo 1.5-T MRI with diagnostic questions consistently answered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; MRI safety; MRI-conditional pacemaker; defibrillator; pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27304515     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Practical considerations for establishing and maintaining a magnetic resonance imaging safety program in a pediatric practice.

Authors:  Tushar Chandra; Govind B Chavhan; Raymond W Sze; David Swenson; Stephanie Holowka; Stanley Fricke; Scott Davidson; Ramesh S Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29

3.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Amir A Rahsepar; Valeria Weltin; Diana McVeigh; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Alan Kwan; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Albert C Lardo; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Stefan L Zimmerman; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Role of Cardiac MRI Imaging of Focal and Diffuse Inflammation and Fibrosis in Cardiomyopathy Patients Who Have Pacemakers/ICD Devices.

Authors:  Ananna Zaman; Samantha Zhao; Jordana Kron; Antonio Abbate; Anna Tomdio; W Gregory Hundley; Jennifer H Jordan
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.955

5.  Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  Daniel Kiblboeck; Christian Reiter; Juergen Kammler; Pierre Schmit; Hermann Blessberger; Joerg Kellermair; Franz Fellner; Clemens Steinwender
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Utilization and programming of an automatic MRI recognition feature for cardiac rhythm management devices.

Authors:  Steven Mullane; Kyle Michaelis; Charles Henrikson; Sei Iwai; Crystal Miller; Camden Harrell; David Hayes
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-03-09

7.  Clinical safety of ProMRI implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems during head and lower lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rudolf Bauer; Dennis H Lau; Christian Wollmann; Andrew McGavigan; Jacques Mansourati; Theresa Reiter; Simone Frömer; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.