Literature DB >> 27303957

Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from a Commercial Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Battery: A Comparative Analysis.

Hyung Chul Kim1, Timothy J Wallington1, Renata Arsenault1, Chulheung Bae1, Suckwon Ahn2, Jaeran Lee2.   

Abstract

We report the first cradle-to-gate emissions assessment for a mass-produced battery in a commercial battery electric vehicle (BEV); the lithium-ion battery pack used in the Ford Focus BEV. The assessment was based on the bill of materials and primary data from the battery industry, that is, energy and materials input data from the battery cell and pack supplier. Cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the 24 kWh Ford Focus lithium-ion battery are 3.4 metric tonnes of CO2-eq (140 kg CO2-eq per kWh or 11 kg CO2-eq per kg of battery). Cell manufacturing is the key contributor accounting for 45% of the GHG emissions. We review published studies of GHG emissions associated with battery production to compare and contrast with our results. Extending the system boundary to include the entire vehicle we estimate a 39% increase in the cradle-to-gate GHG emissions of the Focus BEV compared to the Focus internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV), which falls within the range of literature estimates of 27-63% increases for hypothetical nonproduction BEVs. Our results reduce the uncertainties associated with assessment of BEV battery production, serve to identify opportunities to reduce emissions, and confirm previous assessments that BEVs have great potential to reduce GHG emissions over the full life cycle and provide local emission free mobility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27303957     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Advancing battery design based on environmental impacts using an aqueous Al-ion cell as a case study.

Authors:  N Melzack
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Energy flow analysis of laboratory scale lithium-ion battery cell production.

Authors:  Merve Erakca; Manuel Baumann; Werner Bauer; Lea de Biasi; Janna Hofmann; Benjamin Bold; Marcel Weil
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-04-16

3.  CO2 Mitigation Potential of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles larger than expected.

Authors:  P Plötz; S A Funke; P Jochem; M Wietschel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Novel Al-Ion and a Li-Ion Battery for Stationary Applications.

Authors:  Mario Amin Salgado Delgado; Lorenzo Usai; Qiaoyan Pan; Anders Hammer Strømman
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Enabling Intelligent Recovery of Critical Materials from Li-Ion Battery through Direct Recycling Process with Internet-of-Things.

Authors:  Yingqi Lu; Xu Han; Zheng Li
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Second life and recycling: Energy and environmental sustainability perspectives for high-performance lithium-ion batteries.

Authors:  Yanqiu Tao; Christopher D Rahn; Lynden A Archer; Fengqi You
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Predictive modeling of battery degradation and greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. state-level electric vehicle operation.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Yuanyuan Xie; Yelin Deng; Chris Yuan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.