Literature DB >> 27303091

Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Obese Hospitalized Patients.

Jeffrey Beall, Ashley Woodruff, Carolyn Hempel, Margaret Wovkulich, Kimberly Zammit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obese patients experience a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than their nonobese counterparts, which may warrant a more aggressive approach to thromboprophylaxis in this population.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of nosocomial VTE in obese patients treated with high-dose versus conventional-dose subcutaneous unfractionated heparin sodium (UFH) for thromboprophylaxis.
METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, cohort study was conducted to evaluate obese, adult, hospitalized patients admitted between April 2011 and April 2014 who received heparin 5,000 or 7,500 units subcutaneously every 8 hours for thromboprophylaxis. The primary outcome assessed the rate of nosocomial VTE in obese patients treated with high-dose heparin (7,500 units subcutaneously q 8 h) versus conventional-dose heparin (5,000 units subcutaneously q 8 h). Additionally, a secondary outcome assessed safety by quantifying bleeding events.
RESULTS: Nosocomial VTE occurred in 2/196 (1.02%) patients who received high-dose heparin thromboprophylaxis and in 5/2,182 (0.23%) patients who received conventional-dose heparin (p = .05). Bleeding occurred in 0/196 (0%) patients in the high-dose heparin group and in 2/2,182 (0.09%) patients in the conventional-dose heparin group (p = .67). All bleeding events were minor.
CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the rate of nosocomial VTE in obese patients who received high-dose heparin thromboprophylaxis. Despite receiving a higher heparin dose, no increased risk of bleeding was observed in the high-dose group. Further investigation is needed to identify the optimal heparin dose for thromboprophylaxis in obese patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obese; thromboprophylaxis; unfractionated heparin; venous thromboembolism

Year:  2016        PMID: 27303091      PMCID: PMC4896346          DOI: 10.1310/hpj5105-376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0018-5787


  15 in total

1.  Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; Wendy Lim; Andrew S Dunn; Mary Cushman; Francesco Dentali; Elie A Akl; Deborah J Cook; Alex A Balekian; Russell C Klein; Hoang Le; Sam Schulman; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score.

Authors:  S Barbar; F Noventa; V Rossetto; A Ferrari; B Brandolin; M Perlati; E De Bon; D Tormene; A Pagnan; P Prandoni
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  High dose subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in overweight neurocritical care patients.

Authors:  Sophie Samuel; Emitseilu K Iluonakhamhe; Eileen Adair; Natalie Macdonald; Kiwon Lee; Teresa A Allison; Huimahn A Choi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Obesity as a risk factor in venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Paul D Stein; Afzal Beemath; Ronald E Olson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 5.  Nomograms for the administration of unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of acute thromboembolism--an overview.

Authors:  E Bernardi; A Piccioli; G Oliboni; R Zuin; A Girolami; P Prandoni
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge.

Authors:  J H Chesebro; G Knatterud; R Roberts; J Borer; L S Cohen; J Dalen; H T Dodge; C K Francis; D Hillis; P Ludbrook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the medical patient: controversies and perspectives.

Authors:  Alex C Spyropoulos; Charles Mahan
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  The weight-based heparin dosing nomogram compared with a "standard care" nomogram. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R A Raschke; B M Reilly; J R Guidry; J R Fontana; S Srinivas
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Risk factors for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Frederick A Anderson; Frederick A Spencer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Efficacy and safety of high-dose thromboprophylaxis in morbidly obese inpatients.

Authors:  Tzu-Fei Wang; Paul E Milligan; Catherine A Wong; Eli N Deal; Mark S Thoelke; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy of standard dose unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in morbidly obese and non-morbidly obese critically Ill patients.

Authors:  Young R Lee; Delilah D Blanco
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Thromboprophylaxis Assessment in Surgical Patients Based on Caprini Risk Assessment Model.

Authors:  Tamrat Assefa Tadesse; Hanan Muzeyin Kedir; Atalay Mulu Fentie; Alfoalem Araba Abiye
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-11-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.