Literature DB >> 27302978

Automated Analysis of Microscopic Images of Isolated Pancreatic Islets.

David Habart, Jan Švihlik, Jan Schier, Monika Cahová, Peter Girman, Klra Zacharovová, Zuzana Berková, Jan Kříž, Eva Fábryová, Lucie Kosinová, Zuzana Papáčková, Jan Kybic, Frantiek Saudek.   

Abstract

Clinical islet transplantation programs rely on the capacities of individual centers to quantify isolated islets. Current computer-assisted methods require input from human operators. Here we describe two machine learning algorithms for islet quantification: the trainable islet algorithm (TIA) and the nontrainable purity algorithm (NPA). These algorithms automatically segment pancreatic islets and exocrine tissue on microscopic images in order to count individual islets and calculate islet volume and purity. References for islet counts and volumes were generated by the fully manual segmentation (FMS) method, which was validated against the internal DNA standard. References for islet purity were generated via the expert visual assessment (EVA) method, which was validated against the FMS method. The TIA is intended to automatically evaluate micrographs of isolated islets from future donors after being trained on micrographs from a limited number of past donors. Its training ability was first evaluated on 46 images from four donors. The pixel-to-pixel comparison, binary statistics, and islet DNA concentration indicated that the TIA was successfully trained, regardless of the color differences of the original images. Next, the TIA trained on the four donors was validated on an additional 36 images from nine independent donors. The TIA was fast (67 s/image), correlated very well with the FMS method (R2=1.00 and 0.92 for islet volume and islet count, respectively), and had small REs (0.06 and 0.07 for islet volume and islet count, respectively). Validation of the NPA against the EVA method using 70 images from 12 donors revealed that the NPA had a reasonable speed (69 s/image), had an acceptable RE (0.14), and correlated well with the EVA method (R2=0.88). Our results demonstrate that a fully automated analysis of clinical-grade micrographs of isolated pancreatic islets is feasible. The algorithms described herein will be freely available as a Fiji platform plugin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27302978     DOI: 10.3727/096368916X692005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Transplant        ISSN: 0963-6897            Impact factor:   4.064


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Flaws and Future of Islet Volume Measurements.

Authors:  Han-Hung Huang; Stephen Harrington; Lisa Stehno-Bittel
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  A Multiparametric Assessment of Human Islets Predicts Transplant Outcomes in Diabetic Mice.

Authors:  Hirotake Komatsu; Meirigeng Qi; Nelson Gonzalez; Mayra Salgado; Leonard Medrano; Jeffrey Rawson; Chris Orr; Keiko Omori; Jeffrey S Isenberg; Fouad Kandeel; Yoko Mullen; Ismail H Al-Abdullah
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Semi-Automated Assessment of Human Islet Viability Predicts Transplantation Outcomes in a Diabetic Mouse Model.

Authors:  Mayra Salgado; Nelson Gonzalez; Leonard Medrano; Jeffrey Rawson; Keiko Omori; Meirigeng Qi; Ismail Al-Abdullah; Fouad Kandeel; Yoko Mullen; Hirotake Komatsu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.