| Literature DB >> 27302970 |
Abstract
The attempt to critique the profession of clinical ethics consultation by establishing the impossibility of ethics expertise has been a red herring. Decisions made in clinical ethics cases are almost never based purely on moral judgments. Instead, they are all-things-considered judgments that involve determining how to balance other values as well. A standard of justified decision-making in this context would enable us to identify experts who could achieve these standards more often than others, and thus provide a basis for expertise in clinical ethics consultation. This expertise relies in part on what Richard Zaner calls the "expert knowledge of ethical phenomena" (1988, 8).Keywords: clinical ethics consultation; ethics expertise; will to believe
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27302970 PMCID: PMC4986004 DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhw012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Philos ISSN: 0360-5310