Literature DB >> 27302966

A retrospective analysis of medical record use in e-consultations.

Jennifer L Pecina1, Frederick North2.   

Abstract

Introduction Under certain circumstances, e-consultations can substitute for a face-to-face consultation. A basic requirement for a successful e-consultation is that the e-consultant has access to important medical history and exam findings along with laboratory and imaging results. Knowing just what information the specialist needs to complete an e-consultation is a major challenge. This paper examines differences between specialties in their need for past information from laboratory, imaging and clinical notes. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients who had an internal e-consultation performed at an academic medical centre. We reviewed a random sample of e-consultations that occurred in the first half of 2013 for the indication for the e-consultation and whether the e-consultant reviewed data in the medical record that was older than one year to perform the e-consultation. Results Out of 3008 total e-consultations we reviewed 360 (12%) randomly selected e-consultations from 12 specialties. Questions on management (35.8%), image results (27.2%) and laboratory results (25%) were the three most common indications for e-consultation. E-consultants reviewed medical records in existence more than one year prior to the e-consultation 146 (40.6%) of the time with e-consultants in the specialties of endocrinology, haematology and rheumatology, reviewing records older than one year more than half the time. Labs (20.3%), office notes (20%) and imaging (17.8%) were the types of medical data older than one year that were reviewed the most frequently overall. Discussion Management questions appear to be the most common reason for e-consultation. E-consultants frequently reviewed historical medical data that is older than one year at the time of the e-consultation, especially in endocrinology, haematology and rheumatology specialties. Practices engaging in e-consultations that require transfer of data may want to include longer time frames of historical information for those specialties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E-consultation; e-referral; remote consultation; tele-consultation; virtual consultation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27302966     DOI: 10.1177/1357633X16654607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  1 in total

1.  Evaluating diverse electronic consultation programs with a common framework.

Authors:  Delphine S Tuot; Clare Liddy; Varsha G Vimalananda; Jennifer Pecina; Elizabeth J Murphy; Erin Keely; Steven R Simon; Frederick North; Jay D Orlander; Alice Hm Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.