Literature DB >> 27302169

Integrated Classification of Prostate Cancer Reveals a Novel Luminal Subtype with Poor Outcome.

Sungyong You1, Beatrice S Knudsen1, Nicholas Erho2, Mohammed Alshalalfa2, Mandeep Takhar2, Hussam Al-Deen Ashab2, Elai Davicioni2, R Jeffrey Karnes3, Eric A Klein4, Robert B Den5, Ashley E Ross6, Edward M Schaeffer6, Isla P Garraway7, Jayoung Kim1, Michael R Freeman8.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is a biologically heterogeneous disease with variable molecular alterations underlying cancer initiation and progression. Despite recent advances in understanding prostate cancer heterogeneity, better methods for classification of prostate cancer are still needed to improve prognostic accuracy and therapeutic outcomes. In this study, we computationally assembled a large virtual cohort (n = 1,321) of human prostate cancer transcriptome profiles from 38 distinct cohorts and, using pathway activation signatures of known relevance to prostate cancer, developed a novel classification system consisting of three distinct subtypes (named PCS1-3). We validated this subtyping scheme in 10 independent patient cohorts and 19 laboratory models of prostate cancer, including cell lines and genetically engineered mouse models. Analysis of subtype-specific gene expression patterns in independent datasets derived from luminal and basal cell models provides evidence that PCS1 and PCS2 tumors reflect luminal subtypes, while PCS3 represents a basal subtype. We show that PCS1 tumors progress more rapidly to metastatic disease in comparison with PCS2 or PCS3, including PSC1 tumors of low Gleason grade. To apply this finding clinically, we developed a 37-gene panel that accurately assigns individual tumors to one of the three PCS subtypes. This panel was also applied to circulating tumor cells (CTC) and provided evidence that PCS1 CTCs may reflect enzalutamide resistance. In summary, PCS subtyping may improve accuracy in predicting the likelihood of clinical progression and permit treatment stratification at early and late disease stages. Cancer Res; 76(17); 4948-58. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27302169      PMCID: PMC5047668          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  44 in total

1.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias.

Authors:  B M Bolstad; R A Irizarry; M Astrand; T P Speed
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Brunet; Pablo Tamayo; Todd R Golub; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High-resolution genomic profiles define distinct clinico-pathogenetic subgroups of multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Daniel R Carrasco; Giovanni Tonon; Yongsheng Huang; Yunyu Zhang; Raktim Sinha; Bin Feng; James P Stewart; Fenghuang Zhan; Deepak Khatry; Marina Protopopova; Alexei Protopopov; Kumar Sukhdeo; Ichiro Hanamura; Owen Stephens; Bart Barlogie; Kenneth C Anderson; Lynda Chin; John D Shaughnessy; Cameron Brennan; Ronald A Depinho
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  TMPRSS2:ERG fusion-associated deletions provide insight into the heterogeneity of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sven Perner; Francesca Demichelis; Rameen Beroukhim; Folke H Schmidt; Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Sunita Setlur; Joelle Tchinda; Scott A Tomlins; Matthias D Hofer; Kenneth G Pienta; Rainer Kuefer; Robert Vessella; Xiao-Wei Sun; Matthew Meyerson; Charles Lee; William R Sellers; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  In silico dissection of cell-type-associated patterns of gene expression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert O Stuart; William Wachsman; Charles C Berry; Jessica Wang-Rodriguez; Linda Wasserman; Igor Klacansky; Dan Masys; Karen Arden; Steven Goodison; Michael McClelland; Yipeng Wang; Anne Sawyers; Iveta Kalcheva; David Tarin; Dan Mercola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jacques Lapointe; Chunde Li; John P Higgins; Matt van de Rijn; Eric Bair; Kelli Montgomery; Michelle Ferrari; Lars Egevad; Walter Rayford; Ulf Bergerheim; Peter Ekman; Angelo M DeMarzo; Robert Tibshirani; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown; James D Brooks; Jonathan R Pollack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh; Phillip G Febbo; Kenneth Ross; Donald G Jackson; Judith Manola; Christine Ladd; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico; Jerome P Richie; Eric S Lander; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; William R Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Pathway and gene-set activation measurement from mRNA expression data: the tissue distribution of human pathways.

Authors:  David M Levine; David R Haynor; John C Castle; Sergey B Stepaniants; Matteo Pellegrini; Mao Mao; Jason M Johnson
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Nanoliter high throughput quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Tom Morrison; James Hurley; Javier Garcia; Karl Yoder; Arrin Katz; Douglas Roberts; Jamie Cho; Tanya Kanigan; Sergey E Ilyin; Daniel Horowitz; James M Dixon; Colin J H Brenan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  76 in total

Review 1.  Metastasis Organotropism: Redefining the Congenial Soil.

Authors:  Yang Gao; Igor Bado; Hai Wang; Weijie Zhang; Jeffrey M Rosen; Xiang H-F Zhang
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 3.  Concise Review: Prostate Cancer Stem Cells: Current Understanding.

Authors:  Sergej Skvortsov; Ira-Ida Skvortsova; Dean G Tang; Anna Dubrovska
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 4.  Genomic testing for localized prostate cancer: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Ashley E Ross
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 5.  SOX4: The unappreciated oncogene.

Authors:  Carlos S Moreno
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 6.  Prostate cancer: Novel subtyping could aid stratification and therapy.

Authors:  Annette Fenner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Regulation of inside-out β1-integrin activation by CDCP1.

Authors:  Sara G Pollan; Fangjin Huang; Jamie M Sperger; Joshua M Lang; Colm Morrissey; Anne E Cress; C Y Chu; Neil A Bhowmick; Sungyong You; Michael R Freeman; Danislav S Spassov; Mark M Moasser; William G Carter; Shakti Ranjan Satapathy; Kavita Shah; Beatrice S Knudsen
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Soluble CD105 is prognostic of disease recurrence in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Veronica R Placencio-Hickok; Anisha Madhav; Sungjin Kim; Frank Duong; Bryan Angara; Zhenqiu Liu; Neil A Bhowmick
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.678

9.  Single-cell analysis reveals transcriptomic remodellings in distinct cell types that contribute to human prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Sujun Chen; Guanghui Zhu; Yue Yang; Fubo Wang; Yu-Tian Xiao; Na Zhang; Xiaojie Bian; Yasheng Zhu; Yongwei Yu; Fei Liu; Keqin Dong; Javier Mariscal; Yin Liu; Fraser Soares; Helen Loo Yau; Bo Zhang; Weidong Chen; Chao Wang; Dai Chen; Qinghua Guo; Zhengfang Yi; Mingyao Liu; Michael Fraser; Daniel D De Carvalho; Paul C Boutros; Dolores Di Vizio; Zhou Jiang; Theodorus van der Kwast; Alejandro Berlin; Song Wu; Jianhua Wang; Housheng Hansen He; Shancheng Ren
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  27-Hydroxycholesterol Impairs Plasma Membrane Lipid Raft Signaling as Evidenced by Inhibition of IL6-JAK-STAT3 Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Shweta Dambal; Mahmoud Alfaqih; Sergio Sanders; Erick Maravilla; Adela Ramirez-Torres; Gloria C Galvan; Mariana Reis-Sobreiro; Mirja Rotinen; Lucy M Driver; Matthew S Behrove; Tijana Jovanovic Talisman; Junhee Yoon; Sungyong You; James Turkson; Jen-Tsan Chi; Michael R Freeman; Everardo Macias; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.