Literature DB >> 27301790

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the influence of biological implant surface coatings on periimplant bone formation.

Gregor Jenny1, Johanna Jauernik1, Susanne Bierbaum2, Martin Bigler3, Klaus W Grätz1, Martin Rücker1, Bernd Stadlinger4.   

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the influence of biological implant surface coatings on periimplant bone formation in comparison to an uncoated titanium reference surface in experimental large animal models. The analysis was structured according to the PRISMA criteriae. Of the1077 studies, 30 studies met the inclusion criteriae. Nineteen studies examined the bone implant contact (BIC) and were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the mean increase in BIC for the test surfaces compared to the reference surfaces was 3.7 percentage points (pp) (95% CI -3.9-11.2, p = 0.339). Analyzing the increase in BIC for specific coated surfaces in comparison to uncoated reference surfaces, inorganic surface coatings showed a significant mean increase in BIC of 14.7 pp (95% CI 10.6-18.9, p < 0.01), extracellular matrix (ECM) surface coatings showed an increase of 10.0 pp (95% CI 4.4-15.6, p < 0.001), and peptide coatings showed a statistical trend with 7.1 pp BIC increase (95% CI -0.8-15.0, p = 0.08). In this review, no statistically significant difference could be found for growth factor surface coatings (observed difference -3.3 pp, 95% CI -16.5-9.9, p = 0.6). All analyses are exploratory in nature. The results show a statistically significant effect of inorganic and ECM coatings on periimplant bone formation.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 2898-2910, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal experiments; bone implant interactions; dental implant; histomorphometry; surface coatings complexes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27301790     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  7 in total

Review 1.  Methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews about loading time of multiple dental implants in totally or partially edentulous patients: An umbrella systematic review.

Authors:  Clovis Marinho Carvalho Heiderich; Tamara Kerber Tedesco; Syrio Simão Netto; Rafael Celestino de Sousa; Sergio Allegrini Júnior; Fausto M Mendes; Thais Gimenez
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2020-10-14

Review 2.  Dental implant bioactive surface modifications and their effects on osseointegration: a review.

Authors:  Hsiu-Wan Meng; Esther Yun Chien; Hua-Hong Chien
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2016-12-14

3.  Impaired bone formation in ovariectomized mice reduces implant integration as indicated by longitudinal in vivo micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Zihui Li; Gisela Kuhn; Michael Schirmer; Ralph Müller; Davide Ruffoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Surfce Functionalized via AdLAMA3 Multilayer Coating for Re-epithelization Around Titanium Implants.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yongzheng Li; Jialu Li; Yuan Shi; Jinxing Hu; Guoli Yang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-11

Review 5.  Recent advances in dental implants.

Authors:  Do Gia Khang Hong; Ji-Hyeon Oh
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-11-05

6.  Effect of Combined Application of Growth Factors and Diode Laser Bio-Stimulation on the Osseo Integration of Dental Implants.

Authors:  Mohamed Ali Ali Arakeeb; Ahmed Abbas Zaky; Tarek Abdel-Hamid Harhash; Walid S Salem; Mohamed El-Mofty
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-08-12

7.  Immobilization of a carbon nanomaterial-based localized drug-release system using a bispecific material-binding peptide.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Kokubun; Sachiko Matsumura; Masako Yudasaka; Sumio Iijima; Kiyotaka Shiba
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.