Rajeev Malhotra1, Bishnu P Dhakal1, Aaron S Eisman1, Paul P Pappagianopoulos1, Ashley Dress1, Rory B Weiner1, Aaron L Baggish1, Marc J Semigran1, Gregory D Lewis2. 1. From the Cardiology Division (R.M., B.P.D., A.S.E., R.B.W., A.L.B., M.J.S., G.D.L.) and Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit (P.P.P., A.D., G.D.L.), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 2. From the Cardiology Division (R.M., B.P.D., A.S.E., R.B.W., A.L.B., M.J.S., G.D.L.) and Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit (P.P.P., A.D., G.D.L.), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. glewis@partners.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Pulmonary vascular (PV) distensibility, defined as the percent increase in pulmonary vessel diameter per mm Hg increase in pressure, permits the pulmonary vessels to increase in size to accommodate increased blood flow. We hypothesized that PV distensibility is abnormally low in patients with heart failure (HF) and serves as an important determinant of right ventricular performance and exercise capacity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (n=48), HF with reduced ejection fraction (n=55), pulmonary arterial hypertension without left heart failure (n=18), and control subjects (n=30) underwentcardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic monitoring and first-pass radionuclide ventriculography. PV distensibility was derived from 1257 matched measurements (mean±SD, 8.3±2.8 per subject) of pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and cardiac output. PV distensibility was lowest in the pulmonary arterial hypertension group (0.40±0.24% per mm Hg) and intermediate in the HF with preserved ejection fraction and HF with reduced ejection fraction groups (0.92±0.39 and 0.84±0.33% per mm Hg, respectively) compared to the control group (1.39±0.32% per mm Hg, P<0.0001 for all three). PV distensibility was associated with change in right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF, ρ=0.39, P<0.0001) with exercise and was an independent predictor of peak VO2. PV distensibility also predicted cardiovascular mortality independent of peak VO2 in HF patients (n=103; Cox hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.93; P=0.036). In a subset of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (n=26), 12 weeks of treatment with the pulmonary vasodilator sildenafil or placebo led to a 24.6% increase in PV distensibility (P=0.015) in the sildenafil group only. CONCLUSIONS:PV distensibility is reduced in patients with HF and pulmonary arterial hypertension and is closely related to RV systolic function during exercise, maximal exercise capacity, and survival. Furthermore, PV distensibility is modifiable with selective pulmonary vasodilator therapy and may represent an important target for therapy in selected HF patients with pulmonary hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00309790.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vascular (PV) distensibility, defined as the percent increase in pulmonary vessel diameter per mm Hg increase in pressure, permits the pulmonary vessels to increase in size to accommodate increased blood flow. We hypothesized that PV distensibility is abnormally low in patients with heart failure (HF) and serves as an important determinant of right ventricular performance and exercise capacity. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (n=48), HF with reduced ejection fraction (n=55), pulmonary arterial hypertension without left heart failure (n=18), and control subjects (n=30) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic monitoring and first-pass radionuclide ventriculography. PV distensibility was derived from 1257 matched measurements (mean±SD, 8.3±2.8 per subject) of pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and cardiac output. PV distensibility was lowest in the pulmonary arterial hypertension group (0.40±0.24% per mm Hg) and intermediate in the HF with preserved ejection fraction and HF with reduced ejection fraction groups (0.92±0.39 and 0.84±0.33% per mm Hg, respectively) compared to the control group (1.39±0.32% per mm Hg, P<0.0001 for all three). PV distensibility was associated with change in right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF, ρ=0.39, P<0.0001) with exercise and was an independent predictor of peak VO2. PV distensibility also predicted cardiovascular mortality independent of peak VO2 in HF patients (n=103; Cox hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.93; P=0.036). In a subset of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (n=26), 12 weeks of treatment with the pulmonary vasodilator sildenafil or placebo led to a 24.6% increase in PV distensibility (P=0.015) in the sildenafil group only. CONCLUSIONS: PV distensibility is reduced in patients with HF and pulmonary arterial hypertension and is closely related to RV systolic function during exercise, maximal exercise capacity, and survival. Furthermore, PV distensibility is modifiable with selective pulmonary vasodilator therapy and may represent an important target for therapy in selected HF patients with pulmonary hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00309790.
Authors: Selma F Mohammed; Imad Hussain; Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Omar F Abou Ezzeddine; Hiroyuki Takahama; Susan H Kwon; Paul Forfia; Véronique L Roger; Margaret M Redfield Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gregory D Lewis; Justine Lachmann; Janice Camuso; John J Lepore; Jordan Shin; Maryann E Martinovic; David M Systrom; Kenneth D Bloch; Marc J Semigran Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Bellofiore; J Henningsen; C G Lepak; L Tian; A Roldan-Alzate; H B Kellihan; D W Consigny; C J Francois; N C Chesler Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: William T Abraham; Philip B Adamson; Robert C Bourge; Mark F Aaron; Maria Rosa Costanzo; Lynne W Stevenson; Warren Strickland; Suresh Neelagaru; Nirav Raval; Steven Krueger; Stanislav Weiner; David Shavelle; Bradley Jeffries; Jay S Yadav Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: P G Agostoni; K Wasserman; G B Perego; M Guazzi; G Cattadori; P Palermo; G Lauri; G Marenzi Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: Margaret M Redfield; Horng H Chen; Barry A Borlaug; Marc J Semigran; Kerry L Lee; Gregory Lewis; Martin M LeWinter; Jean L Rouleau; David A Bull; Douglas L Mann; Anita Deswal; Lynne W Stevenson; Michael M Givertz; Elizabeth O Ofili; Christopher M O'Connor; G Michael Felker; Steven R Goldsmith; Bradley A Bart; Steven E McNulty; Jenny C Ibarra; Grace Lin; Jae K Oh; Manesh R Patel; Raymond J Kim; Russell P Tracy; Eric J Velazquez; Kevin J Anstrom; Adrian F Hernandez; Alice M Mascette; Eugene Braunwald Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jennifer L Philip; Thomas M Murphy; David A Schreier; Sydney Stevens; Diana M Tabima; Margie Albrecht; Andrea L Frump; Timothy A Hacker; Tim Lahm; Naomi C Chesler Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Thomas M Gorter; Masaru Obokata; Yogesh N V Reddy; Vojtech Melenovsky; Barry A Borlaug Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Masaru Obokata; Garvan C Kane; Yogesh N V Reddy; Thomas P Olson; Vojtech Melenovsky; Barry A Borlaug Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-12-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew Nayor; Nicholas E Houstis; Mayooran Namasivayam; Jennifer Rouvina; Charles Hardin; Ravi V Shah; Jennifer E Ho; Rajeev Malhotra; Gregory D Lewis Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Jennifer E Ho; Emily K Zern; Emily S Lau; Luke Wooster; Cole S Bailey; Thomas Cunningham; Aaron S Eisman; Kathryn M Hardin; Robyn Farrell; John A Sbarbaro; Mark W Schoenike; Nicholas E Houstis; Aaron L Baggish; Ravi V Shah; Matthew Nayor; Rajeev Malhotra; Gregory D Lewis Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 24.094