Literature DB >> 27300163

Performance of Passive Samplers Analyzed by Computer-Controlled Scanning Electron Microscopy to Measure PM10-2.5.

Thomas M Peters1, Eric J Sawvel1, Robert Willis2, Roger R West3, Gary S Casuccio3.   

Abstract

We report on the precision and accuracy of measuring PM10-2.5 and its components with particles collected by passive aerosol samplers and analyzed by computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Passive samplers were deployed for week-long intervals in triplicate and colocated with a federal reference method sampler at three sites and for 5 weeks in summer 2009 and 5 weeks in winter 2010 in Cleveland, OH. The limit of detection of the passive method for PM10-2.5 determined from blank analysis was 2.8 μg m(-3). Overall precision expressed as root-mean-square coefficient of variation (CVRMS) improved with increasing concentrations (37% for all samples, n = 30; 19% for PM10-2.5 > 10 μg m(-3), n = 9; and 10% for PM10-2.5 > 15 μg m(-3), n = 4). The linear regression of PM10-2.5 measured passively on that measured with the reference sampler exhibited an intercept not statistically different than zero (p = 0.46) and a slope not statistically different from unity (p = 0.92). Triplicates with high CVs (CV > 40%, n = 5) were attributed to low particle counts (and mass concentrations), spurious counts attributed to salt particles, and Al-rich particles. This work provides important quantitative observations that can help guide future development and use of passive samplers for measuring atmospheric particulate matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27300163     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  2 in total

1.  Application of Scanning Electron Microscopy With Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy for Analyzing Ocular Surface Particles on Schirmer Strips.

Authors:  Anuroop Avula; Anat Galor; Patricia Blackwelder; Melissa Carballosa-Gautam; Abigail S Hackam; Bennie Jeng; Naresh Kumar
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Improving the UNC Passive Aerosol Sampler Model Based on Comparison with Commonly Used Aerosol Sampling Methods.

Authors:  Mariam Shirdel; Britt M Andersson; Ingvar A Bergdahl; Johan N Sommar; Håkan Wingfors; Ingrid E Liljelind
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.179

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.