James E Peterman1, Kalee L Morris2, Rodger Kram2, William C Byrnes2. 1. Department of Integrative Physiology, UCB 354, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA. james.peterman@colorado.edu. 2. Department of Integrative Physiology, UCB 354, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Pedelecs are bicycles that provide electric assistance only when a rider is pedaling and have become increasingly popular. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to quantify usage patterns over 4 weeks of real-world commuting with a pedelec and to determine if pedelec use would improve cardiometabolic risk factors. METHODS: Twenty sedentary commuters visited the laboratory for baseline physiological measurements [body composition, maximum oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), blood lipid profile, and 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)]. The following 4 weeks, participants were instructed to commute using a pedelec at least 3 days week(-1) for 40 min day(-1) while wearing a heart rate monitor and a GPS device. Metabolic equivalents (METS) were estimated from heart rate data. Following the intervention, we repeated the physiological measurements. RESULTS: Average total distance and time were 317.9 ± 113.8 km and 15.9 ± 3.4 h, respectively. Participants averaged 4.9 ± 1.2 METS when riding. Four weeks of pedelec commuting significantly improved 2-h post-OGTT glucose (5.53 ± 1.18-5.03 ± 0.91 mmol L(-1), p < 0.05), [Formula: see text] (2.21 ± 0.48-2.39 ± 0.52 L min(-1), p < 0.05), and end of [Formula: see text] test power output (165.1 ± 37.1-189.3 ± 38.2 W, p < 0.05). There were trends for improvements in MAP (84.6 ± 10.5-83.2 ± 9.4 mmHg, p = 0.15) and fat mass (28.6 ± 11.3-28.2 ± 11.4 kg, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Participants rode a pedelec in the real world at a self-selected moderate intensity, which helped them meet physical activity recommendations. Pedelec commuting also resulted in significant improvements in 2-h post-OGTT glucose, [Formula: see text], and power output. Pedelecs are an effective form of active transportation that can improve some cardiometabolic risk factors within only 4 weeks.
INTRODUCTION: Pedelecs are bicycles that provide electric assistance only when a rider is pedaling and have become increasingly popular. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to quantify usage patterns over 4 weeks of real-world commuting with a pedelec and to determine if pedelec use would improve cardiometabolic risk factors. METHODS: Twenty sedentary commuters visited the laboratory for baseline physiological measurements [body composition, maximum oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), blood lipid profile, and 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)]. The following 4 weeks, participants were instructed to commute using a pedelec at least 3 days week(-1) for 40 min day(-1) while wearing a heart rate monitor and a GPS device. Metabolic equivalents (METS) were estimated from heart rate data. Following the intervention, we repeated the physiological measurements. RESULTS: Average total distance and time were 317.9 ± 113.8 km and 15.9 ± 3.4 h, respectively. Participants averaged 4.9 ± 1.2 METS when riding. Four weeks of pedelec commuting significantly improved 2-h post-OGTT glucose (5.53 ± 1.18-5.03 ± 0.91 mmol L(-1), p < 0.05), [Formula: see text] (2.21 ± 0.48-2.39 ± 0.52 L min(-1), p < 0.05), and end of [Formula: see text] test power output (165.1 ± 37.1-189.3 ± 38.2 W, p < 0.05). There were trends for improvements in MAP (84.6 ± 10.5-83.2 ± 9.4 mmHg, p = 0.15) and fat mass (28.6 ± 11.3-28.2 ± 11.4 kg, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION:Participants rode a pedelec in the real world at a self-selected moderate intensity, which helped them meet physical activity recommendations. Pedelec commuting also resulted in significant improvements in 2-h post-OGTT glucose, [Formula: see text], and power output. Pedelecs are an effective form of active transportation that can improve some cardiometabolic risk factors within only 4 weeks.
Entities:
Keywords:
Active commuting; Cycling; Electric assist bicycle; Intervention; Transportation
Authors: Rob C M van Kruijsdijk; Elsken van der Wall; Frank L J Visseren Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Ester Cerin; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: David W Dunstan; Bronwyn A Kingwell; Robyn Larsen; Genevieve N Healy; Ester Cerin; Marc T Hamilton; Jonathan E Shaw; David A Bertovic; Paul Z Zimmet; Jo Salmon; Neville Owen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jessica E Bourne; Ashley R Cooper; Paul Kelly; Fiona J Kinnear; Clare England; Sam Leary; Angie Page Journal: J Transp Health Date: 2020-08-29
Authors: Helga Birgit Bjørnarå; Sveinung Berntsen; Saskia J Te Velde; Liv Fegran; Aslak Fyhri; Benedicte Deforche; Lars Bo Andersen; Elling Bere Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Michelle Laeremans; Evi Dons; Ione Avila-Palencia; Glòria Carrasco-Turigas; Juan Pablo Orjuela; Esther Anaya; Christian Brand; Tom Cole-Hunter; Audrey de Nazelle; Thomas Götschi; Sonja Kahlmeier; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Arnout Standaert; Patrick De Boever; Luc Int Panis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jessica E Bourne; Sarah Sauchelli; Rachel Perry; Angie Page; Sam Leary; Clare England; Ashley R Cooper Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: A R Cooper; B Tibbitts; C England; D Procter; A Searle; S J Sebire; E Ranger; A S Page Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Cougar Hall; Taylor H Hoj; Clark Julian; Geoff Wright; Robert A Chaney; Benjamin Crookston; Joshua West Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2019-08-13