Literature DB >> 27299144

Epidemiology and Death-Related Factors of Oncology Patients in Emergency Department.

Bahram Mofid1, Kambiz Novin1, Elham Sadat Roointan1, Mohammad Mehdi Forouzanfar2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Accurate diagnosis and proper treatment of oncology patients presented to emergency department (ED) can dramatically enhance their quality of life and decrease their mortality rate. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate these patients from an epidemiologic point of view as well as identifying death-related factors.
METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, all the oncology patients presented to ED during one year were evaluated using census sampling. A checklist that consisted of clinical and demographic data as well as patients' outcome was filled for each patient. Using SPSS 21, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was done to identify independent death-related factors.
RESULTS: 568 patients with the mean age of 53.64 ± 18.99 years were studied (56.5% male). The most common locations of tumor were brain (32.7%) and gastrointestinal tract (27.1%). Pain (32.5%) was the most frequent chief complaint on ED arrival. The overall mortality rate of studied patients was 154 (27.1%), 25 (16.2%) of them in ED. Among the evaluated factors, marital status, visiting on a weekday, arrival to ED via ambulance, type of cancer, stage of cancer, presence of metastasis, being under treatment with chemo-radiotherapy, chief complaint on arrival, tumor location, and admission to intensive care unit (ICU) correlated significantly with in-hospital mortality.
CONCLUSION: The most common type of cancer in the studied patients was solid, located in the brain or gastrointestinal tract, in stage III and IV, metastatic, and under chemo-radiotherapy. Independent death-related factors included ICU admission, presentation with loss of consciousness or bleeding, arrival via ambulance, cancer stage > II, neuroendocrine and genitourinary location of cancer, and being under chemo-radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oncology service; emergency medicine; epidemiology; hospital; hospital mortality

Year:  2016        PMID: 27299144      PMCID: PMC4902209     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)        ISSN: 2345-4563


Introduction:

Cancer is the second cause of death behind cardiovascular diseases, worldwide (1). Based on the report of international agency for research on cancer (IARC) in GLOBOCAN 2012, the most common location and highest mortality rate belongs to pulmonary cancer in men and breast cancer in women. Based on the same report, risk of developing cancer before the age of 75 years old is 18.5% for both sexes, while the risk of mortality due to cancer is 10.5% in the same age range. IARC reported the most common cancers in both sexes to be pulmonary, breast, colorectal, prostate, and gastric cancers, in the mentioned order (2). Developing new treatment strategies for cancer patients has led to an increase in their life-span and frequency of emergency department (ED) visits (3). ED is one of the most important places for rapidly addressing the complaints of these patients. Most of these patients visit ED at least once over the course of their disease (4). Recently, many studies have been done to evaluate the different aspects of oncology patients in ED (1, -). Accurate diagnosis and proper treatment of these patients in ED can dramatically enhance their quality of life and decrease their mortality rate (8). Having enough epidemiologic data and a proper plan for managing these patients in ED are necessary for reaching this purpose. Therefore, the present study was designed, aiming to evaluate oncology patients presented to ED from an epidemiologic point of view as well as identifying death-related factors.

Methods:

In the present retrospective cross-sectional study, all the oncology patients presented to the ED of Shohadaye Tajrish Hospital, Tehran, Iran, during one year from April 2014 to March 2015, were evaluated using census sampling. No age or sex limitations were implemented in this study. If the patient died on their way to the hospital, they were excluded. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All the researchers adhered to the principles of Helsinki Declaration during the course of the study. A checklist that consisted of demographic data (age, sex, marital status, living area, employment), type of arrival to ED, day and time of ED visit, history of visits, patient complaints on arrival, cancer characteristics (type, location, stage, presence and location of metastasis), special treatment characteristics (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy), and ED disposition and final outcome (discharge from ED, hospitalization in oncology ward or intensive care unit (ICU), mortality) was filled for each patient. The data were extracted from the patients’ clinical profiles. By searching in the medical records unit, all dead, hospitalized, and discharged oncology patients in ED were evaluated. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 21. Qualitative variables were reported as frequency and percentage, and quantitative ones as mean and standard deviation. Chi square and Fisher’s tests were used to identify variables that had significant correlation with mortality. In addition, multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was done on significant factors to identify independent death-related factors. Type I error (α) was considered 0.05.

Results:

568 patients with the mean age of 53.64 ± 18.99 years (2 - 94) had visited during the study period (56.5% male). 500 (88%) patients experienced their first visit and 367 (64.7%) were presented in the night shift. 372 (65.5%) patients arrived at the ED in a private car. The most common location of tumor were brain (32.7%) and gastrointestinal (27.1%). 247 (43.5%) of the tumors were metastatic. Tables 1 and 2 depict the baseline characteristics of the patients based on their survival. In addition, table 3 summarizes the final outcome of the patients. The overall mortality rate of studied patients was 154 (27.1%), 25 (16.2%) of them in ED. Among the evaluated factors marital status (p = 0.009), visiting on a weekday (p = 0.044), arrival to ED via ambulance (p < 0.001), type of cancer (p = 0.048), stage of cancer (p < 0.001), presence of metastasis (p < 0.001), being under treatment with chemo-radiotherapy (p < 0.001), chief complaint on arrival (p < 0.001), tumor location (p = 0.04), and hospitalization in ICU (p < 0.001) correlated with in-hospital mortality (tables 1 and 2). Table 4 shows the results of stepwise logistic regression analysis.
Table 1

Comparison of baseline characteristics between survived and dead patients

Variable Total Survival Death P value
Sex
   Female247 (43.5)178 (72.1)69 (27.9)0.385
   Male321 (56.5)236 (73.5)85 (26.5)
Age (year)
   1 - 24.939 (6.8)33 (84.9)6 (15.4)0.003
   25 - 49.9173 (30.4)136 (78.6)37 (21.4)
   50 - 74.9271 (47.7)195 (72)76 (28)
   75 - 99.985 (14.9)50 (58.8)35 (41.2)
Marital status
   Single63 (11.1)54 (85.7)9 (14.3)0.009
   Married505 (88.9)360 (71.3)145 (28.7)
Employment
   Employed316 (55.6)229 (72.5)87 (27.5)0.961
   Unemployed240 (42.3)176 (73.3)64 (26.7)
Time of arrival
   Day200 (35.2)140 (70)60 (30)0.236
   Night367 (64.7)274 (74.7)93 (23.3)
Day of arrival
   Weekend88 (15.5)57 (64.8)31 (35.2)0.044
   Weekday 480 (84.5)357 (74.4)123 (25.6)
Living area
   Urban550 (96.8)399 (72.5)151 (27.5)0.235
   Rural18 (3.2)15 (83.3)3 (16.7)
Transportation to ED
   Ambulance182 (32)70 (38.5)112 (61.5)< 0.001
   Private car372 (65.5)334 (89.8)38 (10.2)
Number of ED visits
   1500 (88)360 (72)140 (28)0.333
   264 (11.3)50 (78)14 (21.9)
   33 (5)3 (100)0 (0)
Type of cancer
   Solid537 (94.5)396 (73.7)141 (26.3)0.048
   Hematologic31 (5.5)18 (58.1)13 (41.9)
Stage of cancer
   I29 (5.1)27 (93.1)2 (6.9)< 0.001
   II100 (17.6)96 (96)4 (4)
   III128 (22.5)102 (79.7)26 (20.3)
   IV286 (50.4)167 (58.4)119 (41.6)
Multiple cancers
   Yes32 (5.6)23 (71.9)9 (28.1)0.517
   No536 (94.4)391 (72.9)145 (27.1)
Metastasis
   Positive247 (43.5)147 (59.5)100 (40.5)< 0.001
   Negative320 (56.3)266 (83.1)54 (16.9)
Treatment
   Chemotherapy140 (24.6)95 (67.9)45 (32.1)< 0.001
   Radiotherapy32 (5.6)22 (68.8)10 (31.3)
   Chemo-radiotherapy103 (18.1)59 (57.3)44 (42.7)
   None293 (51.6)238 (81.2)55 (18.8)
ICU admission
   Yes20 (3.9)6 (30)14 (70)< 0.001
   No482 (24.1)371 (77)111 (23)

ED: emergency department; ICU: intensive care unit

Table 2

Comparison of baseline characteristics between survived and dead patients (continued

Variable Total Survival Death P value
ED chief complaints
Fever12 (2.1)11 (91.7) 1 (8.3)< 0.001
Loss of consciousness132 (23.2)65 (49.2)67 (50.8)
Respiratory distress51 (8.9)30 (58.8)21 (41.2)
Gastrointestinal disorder42 (7.3)35 (83.3)7 (16.7)
Pain185 (32.5)149 (80.5)36 (19.5)
Focal neurologic deficit91 (16.0)81 (89)10 (11)
Bleeding16 (2.8)12 (75)4 (25)
Ulcer13 (2.2)8 (61.5)5 (38.5)
Mass22 (3.8)21 (95.5)1 (4.5)
Extremity edema4 (0.7)2 (50)2 (50)
Tumor location
Brain186 (32.7)156 (83.9)30 (16.1)0.004
Breast56 (9.9)40 (71.4)16 (28.6)
Prostate31(5.5)18 (58.1)13 (41.9)
Gastrointestinal154 (27.1)106 (68.8)48 (31.2)
Respiratory24 (4.2)15 (62.5)9 (37.5)
Genitourinary79 (13.9)51 (64.6)28 (35.4)
Lymphoma4 (0.7)4 (100)0 (0)
Skin4 (0.7)3 (75)1 (25)
Neuroendocrine20 (3.5)15 (75)5 (25)
Liposarcoma1 (0.2)0 (0)1 (100)
Bone3 (0.5)3 (100)0 (0)
Neck2 (0.4)2 (100)0 (0)
Heart1 (0.2)0 (0)1 (100)
Cholangiocarcinoma2 (0.4)1 (50)1 (50)
Muscle1 (0.2)0 (0)1 (100)
Location of metastasis
Brain21 (9)13 (61.9)8 (38.1)0.332
Bone36 (15.5)28 (77.8)8 (22.2)
Lung36 (15.5)22 (61.1)14 (8.1)
Multiple57 (24.5)24 (42.1)33 (57.9)
Pleura7 (3.0)5 (71.4)2 (28.6)
Uterus3 (1.2)3 (100)0 (0)
Bladder4 (1.7)2 (50)2 (50)
Liver47 (20.2)28 (59.6)19 (40.4)
Pancreas3 (1.2)2 (66.7)1 (33.3)
Kidney4 (1.7)2 (50)2 (50)
Rectum1 (0.4)0 (0)1 (100)
Peritoneum 3 (1.2)2 (66.7)1 (33.3)
Colon3 (1.2)2 (66.7)1 (33.3)
Pelvic organs1 (0.4)1 (100)0 (0)
Stomach1 (0.4)1 (50)1 (50)
Abdominal2 (0.8)1 (50)1 (50)
Neck2 (0.8)2 (100)0 (0)
Table 3

Outcome of the studied patients

Outcome Number (%)
Emergency ward
   Discharge30 (5.3)
   Death25 (4.4)
   Hospitalization513 (90.3)
Oncology ward
   Discharge384 (74.9)
   Death129 (25.1)
Table    4 

The results of multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis

Variables Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
ICU admission
   Yes4.90 (1.36 - 160.61)0.027
Chief complaint
   Loss of consciousness3.01 (1.66 - 5.44)< 0.001
   Bleeding5.20 (0.98 - 27.60)0.052
Transportation to ED
   Private car0.09 (0.5 - 0.17)< 0.001
Stage of cancer
   II0.17 (0.05 - 0.53)0.002
Treatment
   Chemo-radiotherapy2.16 (1.15 - 4.04)0.016
Tumor location
   Neuroendocrine4.46 (1.05 - 18.94)0.043
   Genitourinary3.85 (1.78 - 8.29)0.001

CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between survived and dead patients ED: emergency department; ICU: intensive care unit Comparison of baseline characteristics between survived and dead patients (continued Outcome of the studied patients The results of multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit.

Discussion:

Based on the results, the most common type of cancer in the studied patients was solid (94.5%), located in the brain (32.7%) or gastrointestinal tract (27.1%), in stage IV (50.4%), metastatic (43.5%), and under treatment with chemo-radiotherapy (49.9%). Finally, 154 (27.1%) patients had died (16.2% in ED) and more than 90% of those who had visited ED had needed hospitalization in the oncology ward. The independent death-related factors were hospitalization in ICU, ED presentation with loss of consciousness or bleeding, arrival via ambulance, cancer stage > II, neuroendocrine and genitourinary location of cancer, and being under chemo-radiotherapy. Currently, despite the advances in cancer treatment, it is still a major health problem and cancer patients commonly face medical emergencies and unexpected life-threatening diseases (3, 12). These patients are most commonly admitted to ED for decreasing the cancer-related symptoms, controlling treatment side effects, oncology emergencies, simultaneous diseases, or palliative care (7, 13, 14). Mean age of oncology patients visiting the ED has been estimated to be between 60 to 68 years in various studies (1, 11, 15, 16).In the present study, mean age of patients was 53.64 ± 18.99 years (2 - 94) and most were in the 50 – 75 age range. Regarding sex distribution, the findings of the present study were in line with previous studies (4, 7, 8). Epigastric pain, nausea and vomiting, and shortness of breath are among the frequent reported causes of ED visit in previous studies (7, 8, 11). While, in the present study, the most common chief complaint of the patients on ED admission was pain, which is in line with the findings of Kraft Rovere et al., Mayer et al., and Barbera et al. (7, 9, 10, 15). In the present study, most cancers were solid (73.7%), which is similar to the Bozdemir et al. study result (88%) (11). The most common location of tumor in our study was brain (32.7%), followed by gastrointestinal tract (27.1%). The most frequent reported tumor locations are lung, gastrointestinal, and respiratory tracts in similar studies (1, 4, 7, -). Out of the 568 cancer patients presented to the ED, 90.3 % were subsequently hospitalized in the oncology department, 5.3% were discharged, and 4.4% died. Death rate in the ED was estimated to be 8-9% in various studies (4, 8). Lower ED mortality rate (4.4%) in the present study might be due to rapid disposition of the patients to other wards and their higher rate of hospitalization. In other words, ED mortality rate has decreased in return to a rise in other wards’ mortality rate. Based on the findings of the present study, independent death-related factors in this study included hospitalization in ICU, visiting due to loss of consciousness or bleeding, arrival via ambulance, higher stage of cancer, tumor type, and being under chemo-radiotherapy. As can be seen, most of these factors are related to severity of disease on admission. For instance, in the studied ED, most of the patients who had arrived via an ambulance were in a worse condition compared to those who had arrived by themselves or accompanied by relatives, and therefore died more. On the other hand, patients in a more severe condition were more commonly admitted to ICU and naturally had a higher death rate. It seems that patients who visited the studied ED were similar to the participants of other studies from an epidemiologic point of view and the differences present are a result of the natural differences in hospitals regarding patient admission policies and available specialties. Multi-centric studies can be helpful in this respect. We should be cautious about using the results of this study since the study design has some limitations for this kind of conclusion.

Conclusion:

Based on the results, the most common type of cancer in the studied patients was solid, located in the brain or gastrointestinal tract, in stage III and IV, metastatic, and under chemo-radiotherapy. The factors correlating with hospital mortality included hospitalization in ICU, ED presentation with loss of consciousness or bleeding, arrival via ambulance, cancer stage > II, neuroendocrine and genitourinary location of cancer, and being under chemo-radiotherapy.
  15 in total

1.  Why do patients with cancer visit the emergency department near the end of life?

Authors:  Lisa Barbera; Carole Taylor; Deborah Dudgeon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Single center experience on causes of cancer patients visiting the emergency department in southwest Turkey.

Authors:  Ozgur Tanriverdi; Halil Beydilli; Birdal Yildirim; Ulku Karagoz
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

3.  Malignant disease in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  M W Brown; J A Bradley; K C Calman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1983-06

4.  Emergency department cancer unit and management of oncologic emergencies: experience in Asan Medical Center.

Authors:  Shin Ahn; Yoon-Seon Lee; Kyung Soo Lim; Jae-Lyun Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Cancer presentation in the emergency department: a failure of primary care.

Authors:  S W Hargarten; M J Richards; A J Anderson; M J Roberts
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Trends in the aggressiveness of end-of-life cancer care in the universal health care system of Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Thi H Ho; Lisa Barbera; Refik Saskin; Hong Lu; Bridget A Neville; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Evaluation of cancer patients admitted to the emergency department within one month before death in Turkey: what are the problems needing attention?

Authors:  Birdal Yildirim; Ozgur Tanriverdi
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

8.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Oncological emergency admissions to the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital: an audit of current arrangements and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  M Yates; A Barrett
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Why do patients with cancer visit emergency departments? Results of a 2008 population study in North Carolina.

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Debbie Travers; Annah Wyss; Ashley Leak; Anna Waller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Bacterial Isolates among Cancer Patients and Healthy Blood Donors at the University of Gondar Specialized Hospital.

Authors:  Abiye Tigabu; Worku Ferede; Gizeaddis Belay; Baye Gelaw
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.