Literature DB >> 27299088

Conjoint Lumbosacral Nerve Root-A Case Report.

Vispi H Jokhi1, Saurabh Vilas Ponde1, Chandrashekhar Sonawane1, Samarjit Singh Bansal1, Ashwin Chavhan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Conjoint nerve root is embryological nerve root anomaly mainly involving lumbosacral region. The anomalous roots present primarily as a bifid, conjoined structure arising from a wide area of the dura. Because of their size and attachment to surrounding structures, they are uniquely susceptible to trauma. The effects of compression and entrapment are amplified in the presence of stenosis of the lateral recesses where developmental changes and disc herniations deplete the available reserve space [1]. CASE REPORT: We report a case of conjoint lumbosacral nerve root which was missed on MRI and diagnosed intra-operatively.
CONCLUSION: The importance of the case report lies in the fact that one must be aware of finding conjoint nerve root directly while operating and do appropriate level of surgery, misinterpretation can lead to devastating results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; conjoint nerve root

Year:  2015        PMID: 27299088      PMCID: PMC4845445          DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep        ISSN: 2250-0685


Introduction

Conjoint nerve root is an embryological nerve root anomaly mainly involving the lumbosacral region. The anomalous roots present primarily as a bifid, conjoined structure arising from a wide area of the dura. Because of their size and attachment to surrounding structures, they are uniquely susceptible to trauma. The effects of compression and entrapment are amplified in the presence of stenosis of the lateral recesses where developmental changes and disc herniations deplete the available reserve space [1]. The anomalous root may be difficult to recognize even at the operating table because of swelling and reactive changes which obscure the anatomical details so that the appearance may simulate that of mass lesion. We are reporting a case of conjoint L4-L5 nerve root in a case of spina bifida with severe lumbar canal stenosis.

Case report

38 year old male worker came with chief complaint of low backache and intermittent bilateral lower limb tingling numbness since last 10 years, symptoms had intensified for the past 4 months. Claudication pain was severe and appeared within 10 minutes of walking or standing. Patient was unable to carry on his daily activities with many days of absenteeism from work. No neural deficit on clinical examination. Patient had received conservative management for 3 months but with no relief. X-ray LS spine suggestive of decreased L4-L5 disc space with spina bifida at L5 level. MRI-LS Spine showed Central and lateral recess stenosis at L4-L5 level and moderate stenosis at L3-L4 level with lumbarised S1 vertebra was reported. We decided to operate him. Decompression with L4 laminectomy and bilateral foraminotomy was planned. Intraoperatively, spina bifida was noted at L5 level. Following flavectomy, an unusual appearance of the anatomical structures was encountered. There were two roots emerging separatelyfrom the dural sac, and entering through the same spinal foramen. Right L4 and L5 were leaving through L5 foramen. Both L4, L5 roots were severely compressed at origin and along the course at lateral recess by thickened ligamentum flavum. Post-operatively, patient recovered from his claudication pain almost immediately and pain disappeared completely in 2 weeks. The patient is now able to do his work without any kind of restriction and disability. Retrospective evaluation of the MRI brought to our attention all the three signs of conjoint nerve root which were previously overlooked. Parallel sign: visualization of the parallel course of the entire nerve root at the disc level. Fat crescent sign: intervening extradural fat tissue between the asymmetric dural sac and the conjoined nerve root. Corner sign: asymmetric morphology of the anterolateral corner of the dural sac.

Discussion

There have been several reports of lumbosacral root anomalies discovered during surgery undertaken for suspected disc herniation [2,3,4]. Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots probably result from aberrant migration of the involved roots during their embryological development [2]. They could occur either as the result of a local factor, or as a consequence-of widespread embryological disorders associated with other anomalies such as sacrum bifidum, and situsinversus of the viscera. The percentage incidence of these nerve root anomalies shows a range comprised between 0.3 and 30%, although the last figure may be overestimated [5]. The roots most frequently involved by the anomaly are L5 and S1[6], accounting for 50% of the total number, while S2 anomalies account approximately for one third of cases; anomalies of other roots are rare. Multiple malformations may be frequent and the majority of them occur on the left side [5]. According to Cannon et al [2], there are three fundamental types of nerve root anomalies Type I: conjoined (or confluent) type, in which 2 roots share a common sleeve that originates from the dura mater Type II (anastomotic type) in which a normal root bifurcates abnormally after it leaves the dura and branches out to the next caudal nerve Type III (transverse type) in which the nerve root leaves The dural sac at almost a right angle. Nerve root anomalies may cause symptoms at more than one level as a result of pressure by, for example, a herniated intervertebral disc. Pressure on an abnormally situated nerve root may also give an incorrect indication of the level of disc herniation. The anomalous roots occupy most of the space in the vertebral canal so that even slight bulging of an intervertebral disc or swelling of a root may cause symptoms.

Conclusion

The diagnosis of a conjoined nerve root anomaly has several points of significance. If not correctly interpreted, it could be mistaken for a herniated disc. The spine surgeons should be aware of these anomalies. If not correctly diagnosed, it can result in wrong level of surgery with a poor outcome. If approached with limited exposure, it could further result in serious damage to the anomalous roots. Raynolds (1954) has shown that sectioning some of these anomalous roots may result in irreversible motor or sensory loss. We conclude that correct diagnosis of root anomalies is important for the patient, any misinterpretation could lead to catastrophic consequences. All surgeons operating on spine should be aware of the anomalies of nerve roots which sometimes can be missed on MRI, and misinterpretation as herniated disc can lead to devastating results especially during limited approach to spine.
  6 in total

1.  Nerve-rootanomalies in lumbar-disc surgery.

Authors:  B W CANNON; S E HUNTER; J A PICAZA
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Malformation of lumbar spinal roots and sheaths in the causation of low backache and sciatica.

Authors:  S ETHELBERG; J RIISHEDE
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1952-08

3.  Anomalous lumbosacral nerve roots associated with spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  M R Rask
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1977-08

Review 4.  Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots: observations on three cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Artico; S Carloia; M Piacentini; G Ferretti; M Dazzi; S Franchitto; E Bronzetti
Journal:  Neurocirugia (Astur)       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.553

5.  Conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots. Management of herniated discs and lateral recess stenosis in patients with this anomaly.

Authors:  J A Epstein; R Carras; J Ferrar; R A Hyman; A Khan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Anomalies of the lumbosacral nerve roots. An anatomical investigation and myelographic study.

Authors:  L J Kadish; E H Simmons
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-05
  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Nerve root anomalies: making sense of a complicated literature.

Authors:  Cameron K Schmidt; Tarush Rustagi; Fernando Alonso; Marios Loukas; Jens R Chapman; Rod J Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 1.475

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.