Dear sir,I would like to raise these following points:Illustration of case report in abstract was somehow different from illustration in the description as the case was explained as a 2 month old clavicle fracture in abstract & it was explained as 4 months old in description and different other time intervals also.Itrogenic compartment syndrome manifestating a week after surgery would not happen, as there was no compartment at clavicle bone, and if any local hematoma would present, that might manifest as a wound dehiscence rather that a isolated neurological symptoms.lateral costo-clavicular space cannot be altered by fixing the fracture as the lateral space is maintained by coraco-clavicular ligaments which were intact in this case.There was no indication for implant removal at 70 days for unstabilising the fracture site as practically it will not increase lateral costo-clavicular space.Why the fracture was fixd again after a year as although the fracture fixation had created the problem. these points indicate unreliability of facts explained in the article.