Literature DB >> 27298800

Left Atrial Decompression by Percutaneous Left Atrial Venting Cannula Insertion during Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

Ha Eun Kim1, Jo Won Jung2, Yu Rim Shin1, Han Ki Park1, Young Hwan Park1, Hong Ju Shin3.   

Abstract

Patients with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) frequently suffer from pulmonary edema due to left ventricular dysfunction that accompanies left heart dilatation, which is caused by left atrial hypertension. The problem can be resolved by left atrium (LA) decompression. We performed a successful percutaneous LA decompression with an atrial septostomy and placement of an LA venting cannula in a 38-month-old child treated with venoarterial ECMO for acute myocarditis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal circulation; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Myocarditis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27298800      PMCID: PMC4900865          DOI: 10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.3.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 2233-601X


CASE REPORT

A problem that has frequently emerged as a critical issue in patients with venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) is a dilatation of the left heart due to volume overload of the left ventricle [1]. This can lead to left atrial (LA) hypertension and cause pulmonary edema. This serious problem can be resolved with LA decompression. Conventionally, a venting cannula is placed in the left atrium via the right upper pulmonary vein or the LA auricle with a sternotomy or a lateral thoracotomy. However, these approaches are risky because of significant complications such as bleeding and scarring. Thus, we decided to perform a percutaneous decompressive procedure. The procedure chosen for percutaneous left heart decompression varies from insertion of the LA venting cannula to placement of an atrial septal stent. Recent reports showed that there was no significant difference between these procedures [2]. Here, we describe a successful percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy and an LA venting cannula insertion during VA ECMO in a patient with severe acute myocarditis. A 38-month-old, 11.7 kg boy was admitted for fever, upper respiratory infection symptoms, and respiratory difficulty. He had suffered from intraventricular hemorrhage and intracranial hemorrhage caused by neonatal asphyxia, and he had been kept on antiepileptic medication due to infantile spasm. His condition rapidly declined shortly after admission. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit with very poor hemodynamics and subsequent supraventricular tachycardia (heart rate >200/min), which did not respond to intravenous amiodarone or adenosine. Despite conventional therapy including inotropes, his condition continued to deteriorate with tachycardia. Echocardiography revealed a marked decrease of 20% in the ejection fraction, and we therefore decided to support him with VA ECMO. Arterial cannulation was performed via the right carotid artery with an 8 Fr percutaneous arterial cannula (RMI; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA), and a 14 Fr percutaneous venous cannula (RMI, Edwards Lifesciences) was placed in the right internal jugular vein. ECMO flow was initially 1,300 mL/min and was maintained between 700 to 800 mL/min. After ECMO insertion, the patient’s vital signs stabilized and his chest X-ray improved (Fig. 1). However, he began to produce a large amount of frothy, bloody endotracheal secretions and his pulse pressure disappeared twelve hours later. Follow-up echocardiography revealed marked left heart distention and a left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 10%. Therefore, fourteen hours after ECMO insertion, the patient was taken to the cardiac catheter laboratory for an atrial balloon septostomy and LA venting cannula insertion. The procedure was accomplished with a percutaneous approach through the right femoral vein without complications and an 8.5 Fr LA venting cannula (Mullins sheath; Cook Inc., Somerset, NJ, USA) was placed successfully. This LA venting cannula was then connected to the ECMO venous line (Fig. 2). After placement of the LA venting cannula, the pulse pressure appeared again, with a 15 mmHg gap between the systolic and diastolic pressure. His follow-up chest X-ray improved (Fig. 3A), and endotracheal suction became creamy and watery. Four days later, we observed recovery of left ventricular function and improvement of the chest X-ray (Fig. 3B). These improved parameters allowed successful ECMO weaning. The total ECMO running time was 63 hours. The patient was transferred to a general ward 10 days after ECMO weaning. Follow-up echocardiography showed improved LV systolic function and an ejection fraction of 65%.
Fig. 1

(A) Preoperative chest X-ray shows cardiomegaly with haziness in the left lung. (B) Chest X-ray showing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support via the right neck vessel. Arterial cannula (black arrow); venous cannula (open arrow).

Fig. 2

Left atrial venting cannula (black arrow) connected to a venous cannula, which shows a brighter color than venous blood.

Fig. 3

(A) Chest X-ray showing improvement of pulmonary edema just after left trial venting cannulation (black arrow). (B) Chest X-ray just before weaning of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (black arrow).

DISCUSSION

Since its introduction as a major support for severe respiratory distress, ECMO has become a well-established therapy in pediatric patients, particularly those with severe but reversible neonatal respiratory failure, cardiac failure, or cardiorespiratory failure. In particular, VA ECMO has been used in pediatric patients with cardiac dysfunction, such as myocarditis, cardiac arrest, and cardiomyopathy [3]. Left heart distension during VA ECMO may develop, leading to progressive left heart deterioration, pulmonary edema, and impairment of myocardial oxygenation [4]. Despite its clinical importance, the management of left heart decompression in a patient with ECMO is rarely discussed. Only sporadic case reports and a few articles have shown the efficacy of LA decompression on functional recovery of the left heart [5-7]. Conventionally, LA decompression is achieved by insertion of an LA venting cannula via sternotomy or thoracotomy. However, sternotomy or thoracotomy themselves are risky and have several complications, such as bleeding and significant scarring. Therefore, we chose a percutaneous approach to LA decompression. LA decompression with a percutaneous cardiac catheterization-based technique including septostomy using a blade or radiofrequency ablation, balloon dilatation, and LA venting cannula insertion has been effective [2,4-6,8]. Several institutions with LA vents have identified technical issues related to management of the indwelling catheters, such as kinking, poor flow, movement of the catheter with required patient care, and ongoing concern for thrombosis. Therefore, a recent study showed a shift in preference from LA vent insertion to balloon dilation alone [2]. However, balloon atrial septostomy alone is not always successful because of varying degrees of atrial septal thickness [9]. We believe that using an LA venting cannula after balloon dilation offers several advantages over balloon dilatation alone. First, the placement of an LA venting cannula potentially allows for controlled decompression of the left heart by adjusting flow rates on the ECMO circuit or clamping the cannula [5]. Second, this procedure minimizes the risk of transseptal communication closure. Third, the size of the cannula can be tailored to each patient, so this procedure can be adjusted for use in smaller patients. For patients with left heart dysfunction causing pulmonary edema during VA ECMO, percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy with LA venting cannula insertion is a treatment option that carries a low risk of other complications such as bleeding.
  9 in total

1.  Left atrial decompression by percutaneous cannula placement while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Anthony M Hlavacek; Andrew M Atz; Scott M Bradley; Varsha M Bandisode
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in pediatric cardiac support.

Authors:  Vinod H Thourani; Paul M Kirshbom; Kirk R Kanter; Janet Simsic; Brian E Kogon; Scott Wagoner; Francine Dykes; James Fortenberry; Joseph M Forbess
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Extracorporeal membranous oxygenation and left atrial decompression: a fast and minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Virginie Fouilloux; Lionel Lebrun; Loic Macé; Bernard Kreitmann
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Percutaneous balloon dilatation of the atrial septum: immediate and midterm results.

Authors:  B D Thanopoulos; D Georgakopoulos; G S Tsaousis; S Simeunovic
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Percutaneous left atrial decompression in patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac disease.

Authors:  Lucas J Eastaugh; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Jeffrey R Darst; Doff B McElhinney; James E Lock; Audrey C Marshall
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Left atrial decompression during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for left ventricular failure in children: current strategy and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kotani; Devin Chetan; Warren Rodrigues; V Ben Sivarajan; Colleen Gruenwald; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Glen S Van Arsdell; Osami Honjo
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.094

7.  Blade and balloon atrial septostomy for left heart decompression in patients with severe ventricular dysfunction on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  P M Seib; S C Faulkner; C C Erickson; S H Van Devanter; J E Harrell; J W Fasules; E A Frazier; W R Morrow
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Transseptal decompression of the left heart during ECMO for severe myocarditis.

Authors:  K E Ward; D W Tuggle; M R Gessouroun; E D Overholt; P C Mantor
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Percutaneous left ventricular "vent" insertion for left heart decompression during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Michael M H Cheung; Allan P Goldman; Lara S Shekerdemian; Kate L Brown; Gordon A Cohen; Andrew N Redington
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.624

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  The ELSO Maastricht Treaty for ECLS Nomenclature: abbreviations for cannulation configuration in extracorporeal life support - a position paper of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.

Authors:  Lars Mikael Broman; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Roberto Lorusso; Maximilian Valentin Malfertheiner; Federico Pappalardo; Matteo Di Nardo; Mirko Belliato; Melania M Bembea; Ryan P Barbaro; Rodrigo Diaz; Lorenzo Grazioli; Vincent Pellegrino; Malaika H Mendonca; Daniel Brodie; Eddy Fan; Robert H Bartlett; Michael M McMullan; Steven A Conrad
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Maastricht Treaty for Nomenclature in Extracorporeal Life Support. A Position Paper of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.

Authors:  Steven A Conrad; L Mikael Broman; Fabio S Taccone; Roberto Lorusso; Maximilian V Malfertheiner; Federico Pappalardo; Matteo Di Nardo; Mirko Belliato; Lorenzo Grazioli; Ryan P Barbaro; D Michael McMullan; Vincent Pellegrino; Daniel Brodie; Melania M Bembea; Eddy Fan; Malaika Mendonca; Rodrigo Diaz; Robert H Bartlett
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Left ventricular decompression in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Ashleigh Xie; Paul Forrest; Antonio Loforte
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

4.  Satisfactory outcome with activated clotting time <160 seconds in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Beong Ki Kim; Jeong In Hong; Jinwook Hwang; Hong Ju Shin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.