Ashwant Kumar Vadepally1, Brig Ramen Sinha1, A V S S Subramanya2, Anmol Agarwal1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad, Telangana India. 2. Department of Anesthesia, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad, Telangana India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The optimal route of intubation that may be planned for different oral and maxillofacial surgical manoeuvres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study was performed on patients who underwent nasal, oral or submental route of intubation for elective oral and maxillofacial surgery under general anaesthesia. The study variables were the anaesthetic and surgeon factors that should be taken into consideration before intubation and during surgery, and also algorithms for uneventful surgical procedures. The outcome variables were influence of the 'route of intubation' on 'surgical technique' and vice versa. Overall results were compiled, tabulated and analysed using SPSS version 14.0. RESULTS: The study sample comprised of 634 patients. It was found that 35 % (204) nasal, 7.5 % (4) oral and 0 % submental route of intubation had statistically significant influence on oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures and vice versa (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This present study concluded that the surgical access and visibility was immensely improved by following the anaesthetic and surgeon factors in conjunction with algorithms described for uneventful oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures. Further, this has also substantially minimized the influence of the 'route of intubation' on 'surgical technique' and vice versa.
PURPOSE: The optimal route of intubation that may be planned for different oral and maxillofacial surgical manoeuvres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study was performed on patients who underwent nasal, oral or submental route of intubation for elective oral and maxillofacial surgery under general anaesthesia. The study variables were the anaesthetic and surgeon factors that should be taken into consideration before intubation and during surgery, and also algorithms for uneventful surgical procedures. The outcome variables were influence of the 'route of intubation' on 'surgical technique' and vice versa. Overall results were compiled, tabulated and analysed using SPSS version 14.0. RESULTS: The study sample comprised of 634 patients. It was found that 35 % (204) nasal, 7.5 % (4) oral and 0 % submental route of intubation had statistically significant influence on oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures and vice versa (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This present study concluded that the surgical access and visibility was immensely improved by following the anaesthetic and surgeon factors in conjunction with algorithms described for uneventful oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures. Further, this has also substantially minimized the influence of the 'route of intubation' on 'surgical technique' and vice versa.
Authors: Andrew Robert Emery; Olga Saniukovich; Angela Lu Lang; Richard John Tannyhill; Jingping Wang Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Kerry-Ann D Williams; Maha Tariq; Maitri V Acharekar; Sara Elena Guerrero Saldivia; Sumedha Unnikrishnan; Yeny Y Chavarria; Adebisi O Akindele; Ana P Jalkh; Aziza K Eastmond; Chaitra Shetty; Syed Muhammad Hannan Ali Rizvi; Joudi Sharaf; Lubna Mohammed Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-07-30