AIM: To investigate whether body adiposity index (BAI; hip/height1.5-18), pediatric BAI (BAIp; hip/height0.8 - 38), and other hip/heightP ratios are useful in obese children. METHOD: Ninety obese Japanese children, 55 boys and 35 girls, who visited our University Clinic, were enrolled. The age was 9.92±2.6 (mean±SD) years, and the percentage overweight (POW) was 51.6±18.8%. We set the power value of the hip/heightP 0, 0.5, 0.8, 1, 1.5, and 2 and studied the association with overweight indices, biochemical data, and fat area measured by computed tomography. Waist, waist/height ratio, and waist/hip ratio were also evaluated. RESULTS: Hip/height and hip/height0.8 (BAIp) were more closely correlated with POW, body mass index percentile, and percentage body fat than hip/height1.5 (BAI). The correlation coefficient of hip/height with POW (r =0.855) was the highest among the studied hip/heightP indices. The approximate line to predict POW was 411×hip/height-207. The waist/height was also highly correlated with POW (r=0.879). Hip and hip/height0.5 were more closely correlated with visceral fat area than hip/height, BAIp, and hip/height1.5. Hip and hip/height0.5 were significantly correlated with insulin. Only hip was also significantly associated with dyslipidemia. All hip/heightP indices were not significantly correlated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Waist was significantly correlated with serum lipids, ALT, and insulin. CONCLUSION: Hip/height and BAIp are better markers for overweight (adiposity) in obese children than BAI. However, hip/height, BAIp, and BAI are not useful to predict metabolic complications. Waist appears to be the best index for obese children overall at this time.
AIM: To investigate whether body adiposity index (BAI; hip/height1.5-18), pediatric BAI (BAIp; hip/height0.8 - 38), and other hip/heightP ratios are useful in obesechildren. METHOD: Ninety obese Japanese children, 55 boys and 35 girls, who visited our University Clinic, were enrolled. The age was 9.92±2.6 (mean±SD) years, and the percentage overweight (POW) was 51.6±18.8%. We set the power value of the hip/heightP 0, 0.5, 0.8, 1, 1.5, and 2 and studied the association with overweight indices, biochemical data, and fat area measured by computed tomography. Waist, waist/height ratio, and waist/hip ratio were also evaluated. RESULTS: Hip/height and hip/height0.8 (BAIp) were more closely correlated with POW, body mass index percentile, and percentage body fat than hip/height1.5 (BAI). The correlation coefficient of hip/height with POW (r =0.855) was the highest among the studied hip/heightP indices. The approximate line to predict POW was 411×hip/height-207. The waist/height was also highly correlated with POW (r=0.879). Hip and hip/height0.5 were more closely correlated with visceral fat area than hip/height, BAIp, and hip/height1.5. Hip and hip/height0.5 were significantly correlated with insulin. Only hip was also significantly associated with dyslipidemia. All hip/heightP indices were not significantly correlated with alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Waist was significantly correlated with serum lipids, ALT, and insulin. CONCLUSION: Hip/height and BAIp are better markers for overweight (adiposity) in obesechildren than BAI. However, hip/height, BAIp, and BAI are not useful to predict metabolic complications. Waist appears to be the best index for obesechildren overall at this time.
Authors: Marieke B Snijder; Mary Nicolaou; Irene G M van Valkengoed; Lizzy M Brewster; Karien Stronks Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Richard N Bergman; Darko Stefanovski; Thomas A Buchanan; Anne E Sumner; James C Reynolds; Nancy G Sebring; Anny H Xiang; Richard M Watanabe Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 5.002