INTRODUCTION: The effect of post-transplant maintenance tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph(+)) leukemia remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis that included allograft recipients with accelerated phase and blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia who had received post-transplant maintenance TKI therapy from 2004 to 2014. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients, 9 with accelerated phase/blast phase CML and 17 with Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia, received maintenance post-transplant therapy with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or ponatinib. The TKI was selected according to the pretransplantation TKI response, anticipated toxicities, and ABL1 domain mutations, when present. Newer generation TKIs were initiated at a ≥ 50% dose reduction from the standard pretransplantation dosing to limit the toxicities and avoid therapy interruptions. TKIs were started a median of 100 days (range, 28-238 days) after transplantation and were administered for a median of 16 months (range, 8 days to 105 months). Eight patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years (range, 4 months to 8.7 years), the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 61%. All 3 patients who developed a relapse underwent successful salvage treatment and remained disease-free. The 5-year overall survival rate was 78%. CONCLUSION: Maintenance TKI therapy after transplantation is feasible and might reduce the incidence of relapses and improve outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with high-risk Ph(+) leukemia.
INTRODUCTION: The effect of post-transplant maintenance tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph(+)) leukemia remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis that included allograft recipients with accelerated phase and blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia who had received post-transplant maintenance TKI therapy from 2004 to 2014. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients, 9 with accelerated phase/blast phase CML and 17 with Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia, received maintenance post-transplant therapy with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or ponatinib. The TKI was selected according to the pretransplantation TKI response, anticipated toxicities, and ABL1 domain mutations, when present. Newer generation TKIs were initiated at a ≥ 50% dose reduction from the standard pretransplantation dosing to limit the toxicities and avoid therapy interruptions. TKIs were started a median of 100 days (range, 28-238 days) after transplantation and were administered for a median of 16 months (range, 8 days to 105 months). Eight patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years (range, 4 months to 8.7 years), the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 61%. All 3 patients who developed a relapse underwent successful salvage treatment and remained disease-free. The 5-year overall survival rate was 78%. CONCLUSION: Maintenance TKI therapy after transplantation is feasible and might reduce the incidence of relapses and improve outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with high-risk Ph(+) leukemia.
Authors: Saurabh Chhabra; Kwang Woo Ahn; Zhen-Huan Hu; Sandeep Jain; Amer Assal; Jan Cerny; Edward A Copelan; Andrew Daly; Zachariah DeFilipp; Shahinaz M Gadalla; Robert Peter Gale; Siddhartha Ganguly; Betty K Hamilton; Gerhard Carl Hildebrandt; Jack W Hsu; Yoshihiro Inamoto; Abraham S Kanate; H Jean Khoury; Hillard M Lazarus; Mark R Litzow; Sunita Nathan; Richard F Olsson; Attaphol Pawarode; Olle Ringden; Jacob M Rowe; Ayman Saad; Bipin N Savani; Harry C Schouten; Sachiko Seo; Nirav N Shah; Melhem Solh; Robert K Stuart; Celalettin Ustun; Ann E Woolfrey; Jean A Yared; Edwin P Alyea; Matt E Kalaycio; Uday Popat; Ronald M Sobecks; Wael Saber Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-11-13
Authors: Chen Chen; Na Xu; Xuejie Jiang; Waner Wu; Xuan Zhou; Liang Liu; Jixian Huang; Changxin Yin; Rui Cao; Libin Liao; Dan Xu; Yuming Zhang; Qifa Liu; Xiaoli Liu Journal: Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao Date: 2019-03-30
Authors: Nicolas J Llosa; Kenneth R Cooke; Allen R Chen; Christopher J Gamper; Orly R Klein; Elias T Zambidis; Brandon Luber; Gary Rosner; Nicholas Siegel; Mary Jo Holuba; Nancy Robey; Masanori Hayashi; Richard J Jones; Ephraim Fuchs; Matthias Holdhoff; David M Loeb; Heather J Symons Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2017-08-12 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Zachariah DeFilipp; Richard Ancheta; Ying Liu; Zhen-Huan Hu; Robert Peter Gale; David Snyder; Harry C Schouten; Matt Kalaycio; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Celalettin Ustun; Andrew Daly; Siddhartha Ganguly; Yoshihiro Inamoto; Mark Litzow; Jeffrey Szer; Mary Lynn Savoie; Nasheed Hossain; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Mehdi Hamadani; Ran Reshef; Ashish Bajel; Kirk R Schultz; Shahinaz Gadalla; Aaron Gerds; Jane Liesveld; Mark B Juckett; Rammurti Kamble; Shahrukh Hashmi; Hisham Abdel-Azim; Melhem Solh; Ulrike Bacher; Hillard Lazarus; Richard Olsson; Jean-Yves Cahn; Michael R Grunwald; Bipin N Savani; Jean Yared; Jacob M Rowe; Jan Cerny; Naeem A Chaudhri; Mahmoud Aljurf; Amer Beitinjaneh; Sachiko Seo; Taiga Nishihori; Jack W Hsu; Muthalagu Ramanathan; Edwin Alyea; Uday Popat; Ronald Sobecks; Wael Saber Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 5.742