Literature DB >> 27297293

Within-group relatedness is correlated with colony-level social structure and reproductive sharing in a social fish.

Jennifer K Hellmann1, Michael G Sovic1, H Lisle Gibbs1, Adam R Reddon2, Constance M O'Connor2, Isaac Y Ligocki1, Susan Marsh-Rollo2, Sigal Balshine2, Ian M Hamilton1,3.   

Abstract

In group-living species, the degree of relatedness among group members often governs the extent of reproductive sharing, cooperation and conflict within a group. Kinship among group members can be shaped by the presence and location of neighbouring groups, as these provide dispersal or mating opportunities that can dilute kinship among current group members. Here, we assessed how within-group relatedness varies with the density and position of neighbouring social groups in Neolamprologus pulcher, a colonial and group-living cichlid fish. We used restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) methods to generate thousands of polymorphic SNPs. Relative to microsatellite data, RADseq data provided much tighter confidence intervals around our relatedness estimates. These data allowed us to document novel patterns of relatedness in relation to colony-level social structure. First, the density of neighbouring groups was negatively correlated with relatedness between subordinates and dominant females within a group, but no such patterns were observed between subordinates and dominant males. Second, subordinates at the colony edge were less related to dominant males in their group than subordinates in the colony centre, suggesting a shorter breeding tenure for dominant males at the colony edge. Finally, subordinates who were closely related to their same-sex dominant were more likely to reproduce, supporting some restraint models of reproductive skew. Collectively, these results demonstrate that within-group relatedness is influenced by the broader social context, and variation between groups in the degree of relatedness between dominants and subordinates can be explained by both patterns of reproductive sharing and the nature of the social landscape.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neolamprologus pulcher; cooperative breeder; dispersal; neighbour; reproductive skew; restriction site-associated DNA sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27297293     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  5 in total

1.  Social buffering of stress in a group-living fish.

Authors:  Brett M Culbert; Kathleen M Gilmour; Sigal Balshine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Age- and sex-dependent variation in relatedness corresponds to reproductive skew, territory inheritance, and workload in cooperatively breeding cichlids.

Authors:  Dario Josi; Dik Heg; Tomohiro Takeyama; Danielle Bonfils; Dmitry A Konovalov; Joachim G Frommen; Masanori Kohda; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Polygyny does not explain the superior competitive ability of dominant ant associates in the African ant-plant, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium.

Authors:  John H Boyle; Dino J Martins; Julianne Pelaez; Paul M Musili; Staline Kibet; S Kimani Ndung'u; David Kenfack; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide.

Authors:  Stephanie J Galla; Roger Moraga; Liz Brown; Simone Cleland; Marc P Hoeppner; Richard F Maloney; Anne Richardson; Lyndon Slater; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Parentage and relatedness reconstruction in Pinus sylvestris using genotyping-by-sequencing.

Authors:  David Hall; Wei Zhao; Ulfstand Wennström; Bengt Andersson Gull; Xiao-Ru Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.821

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.