Literature DB >> 27297289

Interpreting Quality of Life after Brain Injury Scores: Cross-Walk with the Short Form-36.

Lindsay Wilson1, Isaac Marsden-Loftus1, Sanna Koskinen2, Wilbert Bakx3, Monika Bullinger4, Rita Formisano5, Andrew Maas6, Edmund Neugebauer7, Jane Powell8, Jaana Sarajuuri9, Nadine Sasse10, Nicole von Steinbuechel10, Klaus von Wild11, Jean-Luc Truelle12.   

Abstract

The Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) instruments are traumatic brain injury (TBI)-specific assessments of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with established validity and reliability. The purpose of the study is to help improve the interpretability of the two QOLIBRI summary scores (the QOLIBRI Total score and the QOLBRI Overall Scale [OS] score). An analysis was conducted of 761 patients with TBI who took part in the QOLIBRI validation studies. A cross-walk between QOLIBRI scores and the SF-36 Mental Component Summary norm-based scoring system was performed using geometric mean regression analysis. The exercise supports a previous suggestion that QOLIBRI Total scores <60 indicate low or impaired HRQoL and indicate that the corresponding score on the QOLIBRI-OS is <52. The percentage of cases in the sample that fell into the "impaired HRQoL" category was 36% for the Mental Component Summary, 38% for the QOLIBRI Total, and 39% for the QOLIBRI-OS. Relationships between the QOLIBRI scales and the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), as a measure of global function, are presented in the form of means and standard deviations that allow comparison with other studies, and data on age and sex are presented for the QOLIBRI-OS. While bearing in mind the potential imprecision of the comparison, the findings provide a framework for evaluating QOLIBRI summary scores in relation to generic HRQoL that improves their interpretability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GOSE; QOLIBRI; SF-36; TBI; health-related quality of life; outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27297289     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.4287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  16 in total

1.  Quality of life in persons after traumatic brain injury as self-perceived and as perceived by the caregivers.

Authors:  Rita Formisano; Eloise Longo; Eva Azicnuda; Daniela Silvestro; Mariagrazia D'Ippolito; Jean-Luc Truelle; Nicole von Steinbüchel; Klaus von Wild; Lindsay Wilson; Jessica Rigon; Carmen Barba; Antonio Forcina; Marco Giustini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Comparing the Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale as Outcome Measures for Traumatic Brain Injury Research.

Authors:  Natalie Kreitzer; Sonia Jain; Jacob S Young; Xiaoying Sun; Murray B Stein; Michael A McCrea; Harvey S Levin; Joseph T Giacino; Amy J Markowitz; Geoffrey T Manley; Lindsay D Nelson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Long-term outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Cassidy Q B Mostert; Ranjit D Singh; Maxime Gerritsen; Erwin J O Kompanje; Gerard M Ribbers; Wilco C Peul; Jeroen T J M van Dijck
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Comparison of Four Quality of Life Inventories for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries and Orthopedic Injuries.

Authors:  Elisabeth J Harfmann; Terri A deRoon-Cassini; Michael A McCrea; Amy M Nader; Lindsay D Nelson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.869

5.  Discrepancy between disability and reported well-being after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Isabel Rosalie Arianne Retel Helmrich; David van Klaveren; Nada Andelic; Hester Lingsma; Andrew Maas; David Menon; Suzanne Polinder; Cecilie Røe; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ernest Van Veen; Lindsay Wilson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 13.654

6.  Prospective evaluation of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) score: minor differences in patients with major versus no or mild traumatic brain injury at one-year follow up.

Authors:  Konstantin Born; Felix Amsler; Thomas Gross
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Functional and patient-reported outcome versus in-hospital costs after traumatic acute subdural hematoma (t-ASDH): a neurosurgical paradox?

Authors:  Jeroen T J M van Dijck; Thomas A van Essen; Mark D Dijkman; Cassidy Q B Mostert; Suzanne Polinder; Wilco C Peul; Godard C W de Ruiter
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Psychometric Characteristics of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Applied in the CENTER-TBI Study.

Authors:  Nicole von Steinbuechel; Katrin Rauen; Fabian Bockhop; Amra Covic; Ugne Krenz; Anne Marie Plass; Katrin Cunitz; Suzanne Polinder; Lindsay Wilson; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew I R Maas; David Menon; Yi-Jhen Wu; Marina Zeldovich
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Spectrum of outcomes following traumatic brain injury-relationship between functional impairment and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Anastasia Tsyben; Mathew Guilfoyle; Ivan Timofeev; Fahim Anwar; Judith Allanson; Joanne Outtrim; David Menon; Peter Hutchinson; Adel Helmy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  The Military Injuries: Understanding Post-Traumatic Epilepsy Study: Understanding Relationships among Lifetime Traumatic Brain Injury History, Epilepsy, and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Mary Jo Pugh; Eamonn Kennedy; James J Gugger; Jamie Mayo; David Tate; Alicia Swan; Jacob Kean; Hamada Altalib; Shaila Gowda; Alan Towne; Sidney Hinds; Anne Van Cott; Maria R Lopez; Carlos A Jaramillo; Blessen C Eapen; Randall R McCafferty; Martin Salinsky; Joyce Cramer; Katherine K McMillan; Andrea Kalvesmaki; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.