Literature DB >> 27296953

Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.

Yue-Shen Wang1, Jing Tian, Yong Han, Shu-Mei Han, Sheng-Bin Shi.   

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer. We enrolled 35 patients who received gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy failure between May 2009 and April 2012. Dosage: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2); all drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and this was continued until failure or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 125 cycles of treatment were administered, and all patients received at least two cycles of treatment (two to five cycles; median number of cycles: three). Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. The response rate was 31.3%, and the disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 62.5%. The progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 ± 0.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.0-4.6], and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.3 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 6.7-7.8). In the subgroup analysis, median PFS was 4.0 ± 0.2 months (95% CI, 3.6-4.3) in patients with high expression of miRNA-214, while it was 4.6 ± 0.3 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.1) in patients with low expression of miRNA-214 (log rank = 0.023). Myelosuppression with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common side effect observed with this combination regimen, and higher than grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 10 (31.3%) and 8 patients (25.0%), respectively. Grade 3 fatigue was the most common nonhematologic toxicity, which was observed in 2 (6.1%) patients. The combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine was well tolerated as second-line treatment for platinum-based chemotherapy-refractory esophageal cancer patients and appeared to provide enhanced clinical activity especially in patients with low expression of miRNA-214.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27296953     DOI: 10.3727/096504016X14618564639213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Res        ISSN: 0965-0407            Impact factor:   5.574


  3 in total

Review 1.  Resistance to Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Physiopathologic and Pharmacologic Review.

Authors:  Tomas Koltai; Stephan Joel Reshkin; Tiago M A Carvalho; Daria Di Molfetta; Maria Raffaella Greco; Khalid Omer Alfarouk; Rosa Angela Cardone
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Recent advancements in esophageal cancer treatment in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Tanaka; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Tomonari Suetsugu; Takeharu Imai; Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Kazuya Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-05-28

3.  ERCC1 rs11615 polymorphism and chemosensitivity to platinum drugs in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuqiang Zhang; Sufen Cao; Chunyu Zhuang; Jiacheng Chen; Xiaojing Chen; Hong Sun; Shengying Lin; Bailang Lin
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.234

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.