| Literature DB >> 27296891 |
Arjun Kalvala1, Li Gao1, Brittany Aguila1, Kathleen Dotts1, Mohammad Rahman1, Serge P Nana-Sinkam1,2, Xiaoping Zhou3, Qi-En Wang4, Joseph Amann1,5, Gregory A Otterson1,5, Miguel A Villalona-Calero6,7,8, Wenrui Duan9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fusion proteins have unique oncogenic properties and their identification can be useful either as diagnostic or therapeutic targets. Next generation sequencing data have previously shown a fusion gene formed between Rad51C and ATXN7 genes in the MCF7 breast cancer cell line. However, the existence of this fusion gene in colorectal patient tumor tissues is largely still unknown.Entities:
Keywords: ATXN7; Chromosomal translocation; Colorectal tumors; Fusion gene; Rad51C
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27296891 PMCID: PMC4906819 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-016-0527-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cancer ISSN: 1476-4598 Impact factor: 27.401
Fig. 1RT-PCR amplification and sequencing analysis of fusion gene Rad51C-ATXN7. Colorectal tumor (T) RNA isolated by TRIzol method, was RT-PCR amplified and sequenced. The primers (Additional file 1: Table S1) that span exon-5 of Rad51C and exon -8 of ATXN7 produced two fragments of approximately 376 bp and 316 bp (a). The RT-PCR amplified product from a colorectal tumor (T) showed 376 bp fragment only which was absent in the corresponding non-tumor (NT) sample (b). The RT-PCR amplified products were Topo TA cloned and sequenced. The RT-PCR products contained a Variant 1 of Rad51C (exon 1–7) and ATXN7 (exon 6–13) fusion gene (c) and a Variant 2 without exon-7 Rad51C (exon 1–6) ATXN7 (exon 6–13) (d). The solid bar line indicates the sequence breakpoint joining Rad51C and ATXN7
Fig. 2Schematic representation of portion of the fusion Variant 2 of Rad51C-ATXN7. The fusion transcript and their breakpoints are indicated with exons of Rad51C and ATXN7. The Variant 2 of the fusion gene transcript is joined at 3′-end of exon-6 of Rad51C with 5′-end of the exon-6 of ATXN7. The Fusion protein has lost its nuclear localization signal located at the C-terminus end of Rad51C and CAG (Poly glutamine tract) repeat sequence of ATXN7. The ATP binding site and BRC (BRCA1) interacting domains of Rad51C are conserved at N-terminus of the fusion protein and SCA7 (Spino- cerebral ataxia 7) domain of ATXN7 conserved at middle terminus of the fusion protein
Fig. 3Identification and expression of the fusion gene Variant 2 Rad51C-ATXN7 by RT-PCR. A total of 67 colorectal tumor RNA (T) and their corresponding non-tumor RNA (NT) were isolated and RT-PCR amplified to identify the fusion gene. The RT-PCR amplification using primers specific for Variant 2 produces 288 bp fragments when run on 2 % agarose gel. 18 s Ribosomal rRNA was used as loading control
The Rad51C-ATXN7 fusion gene expression in colorectal tumors
| Tumors Tested | Fusion Gene Expression | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| FANCD2 Foci negative | 20 (30 %) | 60 % (12/20) |
| FANCD2 Foci positive | 47 (70 %) | 26 % (12/47) |
|
| **0.01 |
**Indicates significant p value
Fig. 4Real time PCR analysis of Rad51C-ATXN7 fusion gene Variant 2 expression in LS-174 T and RKO colorectal tumor cells pre and post 5-Azacytidine treatment. The LS-174 T and RKO cells were treated with 5-Azacytidine at dose of 5 μM for 72 h. The total RNA was isolated from pre and post 5-Azacytdine treated LS-174 T and RKO colorectal tumor cells and reverse transcribed to cDNA. The cDNA was then used as template for Rad51C-ATXN7 fusion Variant expression analysis using Taqman real time PCR. The analysis showed 3.51 fold increase in relative expression of RNA for Variant 2 in comparison to untreated control in LS-174 T cells. The RKO cells showed only 1.2 fold mild increase in relative expression of RNA for Variant 2 in comparison to untreated control
Fig. 5Western blot analysis of Rad51C-ATXN7 fusion protein in colon tumor cells. The immunoprecipitation pull down and immunoblot detection of the fusion protein Rad51C-ATXN7 in human colon cancer LS174T and RKO cell lines are shown. The pull down was carried out using 500 μg total cell lysates prepared from LS-174 T, RKO cells. Briefly, the total cell lysates were incubated with Dynabeads® containing protein G and 10 μg mouse monoclonal anti-Rad51C antibody. Immunoblot detection was carried out using Rabbit polyclonal anti-ATXN7 antibody and anti-rabbit secondary antibody by loading 150 μg total protein on 4–12 % NuPAGE gel. Lane 1- Total LS174T cell lysate, Lane 2- LS174T protein immunoprecipitated using anti-Rad51C antibody, Lane 3- Total RKO cell lysate, Lane 4- RKO protein immunoprecipitated using anti-Rad51C antibody. The immunoblot was detected using anti-ATXN7 antibody
Fig. 6MTT assay analysis of cell survival in LS-174 T and RKO cells post treatment of cisplatin. We analysed cell survival fractions for the cells that are expressing the fusion gene (LS-174 T) as compared with non-expressing cells (RKO) post treatment of cisplatin (5 μg/ml). MTT assay was used for the cell viability analysis and an averaged absorbance was recorded 24, 48 and 72 h post treatment. Cell viability analysis showed that the LS-174 T cells had 60 and 27.5 % of viable cells compared to non-treatment controls 48 h and 72 h post treatment with cisplatin. In contrast, there were 80 and 46 % of viable cells in the RKO population 48 h and 72 h post cisplatin treatment. The LS-174 T cell was more sensitive to the treatment of cisplatin