Literature DB >> 27296046

Differential sex-specific walking kinematics in leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) selectively bred for different body size.

Kayleigh A Rose1, Jonathan R Codd1, Robert L Nudds2.   

Abstract

The differing limb dynamics and postures of small and large terrestrial animals may be mechanisms for minimising metabolic costs under scale-dependent muscle force, work and power demands; however, empirical evidence for this is lacking. Leghorn chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) are highly dimorphic: males have greater body mass and relative muscle mass than females, which are permanently gravid and have greater relative intestinal mass. Furthermore, leghorns are selected for standard (large) and bantam (small) varieties and the former are sexually dimorphic in posture, with females having a more upright limb. Here, high-speed videography and morphological measurements were used to examine the walking gaits of leghorn chickens of the two varieties and sexes. Hindlimb skeletal elements were geometrically similar among the bird groups, yet the bird groups did not move with dynamic similarity. In agreement with the interspecific scaling of relative duty factor (DF, the proportion of a stride period with ground contact for any given foot) with body mass, bantams walked with greater DF than standards, and females walked with greater DF than males. Greater DF in females than in males was achieved via variety-specific kinematic mechanisms, associated with the presence/absence of postural dimorphism. Females may require greater DF in order to reduce peak muscle forces and minimise power demands associated with lower muscle to reproductive tissue mass ratios and smaller body size. Furthermore, a more upright posture observed in the standard, but not bantam, females, may relate to minimising the work demands of being larger and having proportionally larger reproductive tissue volume. Lower DF in males relative to females may also be a work-minimising strategy and/or due to greater limb inertia (as a result of greater pelvic limb muscle mass) prolonging the swing phase.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Duty factor; Dynamic similarity; Froude number; Locomotion; Posture; Sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27296046     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.139709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  3 in total

1.  Body proportions for the facilitation of walking, running and flying: the case of partridges.

Authors:  Jesús Nadal; Carolina Ponz; Antoni Margalida
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.260

2.  Examining the accuracy of trackways for predicting gait selection and speed of locomotion.

Authors:  Andres Marmol-Guijarro; Robert Nudds; Lars Folkow; Jonathan Codd
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Does posture explain the kinematic differences in a grounded running gait between male and female Svalbard rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta hyperborea) moving on snow?

Authors:  Andres Marmol-Guijarro; Robert Nudds; Lars Folkow; John Lees; Jonathan Codd
Journal:  Polar Biol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.310

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.