Literature DB >> 27295662

Shear Wave Speed Measurements Using Crawling Wave Sonoelastography and Single Tracking Location Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging for Tissue Characterization.

Juvenal Ormachea, Roberto J Lavarello, Stephen A McAleavey, Kevin J Parker, Benjamin Castaneda.   

Abstract

Elastography provides tissue stiffness information that attempts to characterize the elastic properties of tissue. However, there is still limited literature comparing elastographic modalities for tissue characterization. This study focuses on two quantitative techniques using different vibration sources that have not been compared to date: crawling wave sonoelastography (CWS) and single tracking location shear wave elasticity imaging (STL-SWEI). To understand each technique's performance, shear wave speed (SWS) was measured in homogeneous phantoms and ex vivo beef liver tissue. Then, the contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and lateral resolution were measured in an inclusion and two-layer phantoms. The SWS values obtained with both modalities were validated with mechanical measurements (MM) which serve as ground truth. The SWS results for the three different homogeneous phantoms (10%, 13%, and 16% gelatin concentrations) and ex vivo beef liver tissue showed good agreement between CWS, STL-SWEI, and MM as a function of frequency. For all gelatin phantoms, the maximum accuracy errors were 2.52% and 2.35% using CWS and STL-SWEI, respectively. For the ex vivo beef liver, the maximum accuracy errors were 9.40% and 7.93% using CWS and STL-SWEI, respectively. For lateral resolution, contrast, and CNR, both techniques obtained comparable measurements for vibration frequencies less than 300 Hz (CWS) and distances between the push beams ( ∆x ) between 3 mm and 5.31 mm (STL-SWEI). The results obtained in this study agree over an SWS range of 1-6 m/s. They are expected to agree in perfectly linear, homogeneous, and isotropic materials, but the SWS overlap is not guaranteed in all materials because each of the three methods have unique features.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27295662     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2576962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  5 in total

1.  Towards a consensus on rheological models for elastography in soft tissues.

Authors:  K J Parker; T Szabo; S Holm
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Distributing Synthetic Focusing Over Multiple Push-Detect Events Enhances Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging Performance.

Authors:  Rifat Ahmed; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Wave-based optical coherence elastography: The 10-year perspective.

Authors:  Fernando Zvietcovich; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol)       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  Plane-Wave Imaging Improves Single-Track Location Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.

Authors:  Rifat Ahmed; Scott A Gerber; Stephen A McAleavey; Giovanni Schifitto; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Spring-damper equivalents of the fractional, poroelastic, and poroviscoelastic models for elastography.

Authors:  Sverre Holm
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.044

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.