BACKGROUND: Resident-to-resident elder mistreatment (R-REM) in nursing homes can cause physical and psychological injury and death, yet its prevalence remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of physical, verbal, and sexual R-REM in nursing home residents and subgroups. DESIGN: 1-month observational prevalence study. SETTING: 5 urban and 5 suburban New York state nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: 2011 residents in 10 facilities randomly selected on the basis of size and location; 83% of facilities and 84% of eligible residents participated. MEASUREMENTS: R-REM was identified through resident interviews, staff interviews, shift coupons, observation, chart review, and accident or incident reports. RESULTS: 407 of 2011 residents experienced at least 1 R-REM event; the total 1-month prevalence was 20.2% (95% CI, 18.1% to 22.5%). The most common forms were verbal (9.1% [CI, 7.7% to 10.8%]), other (such as invasion of privacy or menacing gestures) (5.3% [CI, 4.4% to 6.4%]), physical (5.2% [CI, 4.1% to 6.5%]), and sexual (0.6% [CI, 0.3% to 1.1%]). Several clinical and contextual factors (for example, lower vs. severe levels of cognitive impairment, residing on a dementia unit, and higher nurse aide caseload) were associated with higher estimated rates of R-REM. LIMITATIONS: Most facilities were relatively large. All R-REM cases may not have been detected; resident and staff reporting may be subject to recall bias. CONCLUSION: R-REM in nursing homes is highly prevalent. Verbal R-REM is most common, but physical mistreatment also occurs frequently. Because R-REM can cause injury or death, strategies are urgently needed to better understand its causes so that prevention strategies can be developed. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.
BACKGROUND: Resident-to-resident elder mistreatment (R-REM) in nursing homes can cause physical and psychological injury and death, yet its prevalence remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of physical, verbal, and sexual R-REM in nursing home residents and subgroups. DESIGN: 1-month observational prevalence study. SETTING: 5 urban and 5 suburban New York state nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: 2011 residents in 10 facilities randomly selected on the basis of size and location; 83% of facilities and 84% of eligible residents participated. MEASUREMENTS: R-REM was identified through resident interviews, staff interviews, shift coupons, observation, chart review, and accident or incident reports. RESULTS: 407 of 2011 residents experienced at least 1 R-REM event; the total 1-month prevalence was 20.2% (95% CI, 18.1% to 22.5%). The most common forms were verbal (9.1% [CI, 7.7% to 10.8%]), other (such as invasion of privacy or menacing gestures) (5.3% [CI, 4.4% to 6.4%]), physical (5.2% [CI, 4.1% to 6.5%]), and sexual (0.6% [CI, 0.3% to 1.1%]). Several clinical and contextual factors (for example, lower vs. severe levels of cognitive impairment, residing on a dementia unit, and higher nurse aide caseload) were associated with higher estimated rates of R-REM. LIMITATIONS: Most facilities were relatively large. All R-REM cases may not have been detected; resident and staff reporting may be subject to recall bias. CONCLUSION:R-REM in nursing homes is highly prevalent. Verbal R-REM is most common, but physical mistreatment also occurs frequently. Because R-REM can cause injury or death, strategies are urgently needed to better understand its causes so that prevention strategies can be developed. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.
Authors: Karl Pillemer; Emily K Chen; Kimberly S Van Haitsma; Jeanne Teresi; Mildred Ramirez; Stephanie Silver; Gail Sukha; Mark S Lachs Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2011-11-01
Authors: Noha Ferrah; Briony J Murphy; Joseph E Ibrahim; Lyndal C Bugeja; Margaret Winbolt; Dina LoGiudice; Leon Flicker; David L Ranson Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Mildred Ramirez; Beverly Watkins; Jeanne A Teresi; Stephanie Silver; Gail Sukha; Gabriel Bortagis; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Mark S Lachs; Karl Pillemer Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Mildred Ramirez; Joseph P Eimicke; Stephanie Silver; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Mark S Lachs; Karl A Pillemer Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2013-02-28
Authors: Tomoko Shinoda-Tagawa; Ralph Leonard; Jean Pontikas; John E McDonough; Donna Allen; Paul I Dreyer Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Carolyn Hullick; Christopher R Carpenter; Robert Critchlow; Ellen Burkett; Glenn Arendts; Guruprasad Nagaraj; Tony Rosen Journal: Emerg Med Australas Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 2.151
Authors: Jeanne A Teresi; David Burnes; Elizabeth A Skowron; Mary Ann Dutton; Laura Mosqueda; Mark S Lachs; Karl Pillemer Journal: J Elder Abuse Negl Date: 2016-09-27
Authors: Barbara Resnick; Elizabeth Galik; Ann Kolanowski; Kimberly VanHaitsma; Marie Boltz; Shijun Zhu; Jeanette Ellis; Liza Behrens; Karen Eshraghi Journal: J Women Aging Date: 2020-03-06
Authors: Karl Pillemer; Stephanie Silver; Mildred Ramirez; Jian Kong; Joseph P Eimicke; Gabriel D Boratgis; Rhoda Meador; Leslie Schultz; Mark S Lachs; Julia Nolte; Emily K Chen; Jeanne A Teresi Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-12-27 Impact factor: 5.562