Literature DB >> 27295464

Interpolated testing influences focused attention and improves integration of information during a video-recorded lecture.

Helen G Jing1, Karl K Szpunar2, Daniel L Schacter1.   

Abstract

Although learning through a computer interface has become increasingly common, little is known about how to best structure video-recorded lectures to optimize learning. In 2 experiments, we examine changes in focused attention and the ability for students to integrate knowledge learned during a 40-min video-recorded lecture. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate that interpolating a lecture with memory tests (tested group), compared to studying the lecture material for the same amount of time (restudy group), improves overall learning and boosts integration of related information learned both within individual lecture segments and across the entire lecture. Although mind wandering rates between the tested and restudy groups did not differ, mind wandering was more detrimental for final test performance in the restudy group than in the tested group. In Experiment 2, we replicate the findings of Experiment 1, and additionally show that interpolated tests influence the types of thoughts that participants report during the lecture. While the tested group reported more lecture-related thoughts, the restudy group reported more lecture-unrelated thoughts; furthermore, lecture-related thoughts were positively related to final test performance, whereas lecture-unrelated thoughts were negatively related to final test performance. Implications for the use of interpolated testing in video-recorded lectures are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27295464     DOI: 10.1037/xap0000087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  8 in total

Review 1.  The power of negative and positive episodic memories.

Authors:  Samantha E Williams; Jaclyn H Ford; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.526

Review 2.  Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Michael J Kane; Jonathan Smallwood; Daniel L Schacter; David Maillet; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Mind Wandering in a Multimodal Reading Setting: Behavior Analysis & Automatic Detection Using Eye-Tracking and an EDA Sensor.

Authors:  Iuliia Brishtel; Anam Ahmad Khan; Thomas Schmidt; Tilman Dingler; Shoya Ishimaru; Andreas Dengel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Individual differences in task-unrelated thought in university classrooms.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Nicholas P Carruth; John H Lurquin; Paul J Silvia; Bridget A Smeekens; Claudia C von Bastian; Akira Miyake
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-04-22

5.  Interpolated testing and content pretesting as interventions to reduce task-unrelated thoughts during a video lecture.

Authors:  Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips; Bridget A Smeekens; Akira Miyake; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-03-26

6.  Flipping the Classroom in Medical Student Education: Does Priming Work?

Authors:  Emily Rose; Paul Jhun; Matthew Baluzy; Aaron Hauck; Jonathan Huang; Jonathan Wagner; Yvette L Kearl; Solomon Behar; Ilene Claudius
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-05

7.  Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning.

Authors:  Kana Okano; Jakub R Kaczmarzyk; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does testing enhance new learning because it insulates against proactive interference?

Authors:  Dahwi Ahn; Jason C K Chan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.