| Literature DB >> 27294948 |
Nuredin I Mohammed1, Mark L Everard2, Jon G Ayres3, Nicola J Barker4, Ian J Litchfield5.
Abstract
Some in vitro studies have indicated a possible link between respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection and exposure to Nitric Oxide (NO). However, these studies used much higher NO concentrations than normally found in the ambient environment. This preliminary study explored whether an association was present with short-term exposure to NO in the environment. RSV-related admission data between November 2011 and February 2012 were obtained from Sheffield Children's Hospital. The dates of admission were linked to contemporaneous ambient NO derived from sentinel air monitors. The case-crossover design was used to study the relationship between daily RSV admissions and NO, controlling for temperature and relative humidity. We found little evidence of association between daily RSV admission rates and exposure to ambient NO at different lags or average exposure across several lags. The findings should, however, be viewed with caution due to the low number of events observed during the time frame. It is possible that the apparent lack of association may be accounted for by the timing of the seasonal RSV epidemic in relation to peaks in NO concentrations. A larger study incorporating a wider range of RSV and NO peaks would determine whether said peaks enhanced the number of RSV hospitalizations in children.Entities:
Keywords: air pollution; bronchiolitis; nitrogen oxide; respiratory syncytial virus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27294948 PMCID: PMC4924035 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13060578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Summary for daily admission counts and NO concentration by monitoring station.
| Variable | Mean | Median (IQR b) | Minimum | Maximum | Number of Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (days) | 132.7 (101) | 111 (43–189) | 7 | 573 | 121 |
| Admission count | 1.7 (1.9) | 1 (0–2) | 0 | 9 | 121 |
| Temperature (°C) | 6.3 (3.6) | 6.7 (3.6–9.1) | −2.3 | 13.3 | 121 |
| Relative humidity (%) | 80.3 (11.4) | 81.8 (72–88.5) | 41.8 | 98 | 101 |
| NO (μg/m3) | |||||
| Sheffield Centre | 26.4 (31.7) | 16.6 (5.1–36.8) | 1 | 173.2 | 120 |
| Sheffield Tinsley | 25.8 (35.1) | 15.7 (6.9–28.4) | 1.3 | 267.9 | 121 |
| Ladybower | 3.2 (2.1) | 2.5 (1.6–4.2) | 0.6 | 12.9 | 115 |
| Average | 18.6 (20.7) | 11.8 (7.2–21.1) | 1.3 | 141.8 | 114 |
| Sex (N, %) a | |||||
| Female | 99 (47.6) |
a Number, percent; b Interquartile range.
Figure 1Average NO concentrations and RSV related admissions at Sheffield Children’s Hospital.
Figure 2Distribution of RSV infected cases admitted to Sheffield Children’s Hospital and location of monitoring stations.
Figure 3NO concentrations for the three monitoring stations around Sheffield city over the study period November 2011–February 2012.
Figure 4OR (95% CI) for the association of daily RSV admission and average NO concentrations in Sheffield. (A) Single lags; (B) Average of lags.
Association between NO and RSV admissions using data from a central monitoring station vs. average NO concentration from three monitoring stations.
| Metric | Sheffield Centre | Average * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Lag 0 | 0.94 (0.85, 1.04) | 0.23 | 0.97 (0.84, 1.11) | 0.62 |
| Lag 1 | 0.98 (0.91, 1.05) | 0.57 | 0.93 (0.82, 1.05) | 0.23 |
| Lag 2 | 0.99 (0.92, 1.05) | 0.69 | 0.98 (0.89, 1.07) | 0.59 |
| Lag 3 | 1.01 (0.95, 1.07) | 0.80 | 0.97 (0.87, 1.09) | 0.62 |
| Lag 4 | 0.99 (0.93, 1.06) | 0.80 | 0.99 (0.9, 1.09) | 0.85 |
| Lag 5 | 1.0 (0.93, 1.08) | 0.97 | 0.96 (0.86, 1.08) | 0.51 |
| Lag 6 | 0.96 (0.88, 1.04) | 0.27 | 0.91 (0.8, 1.04) | 0.16 |
| Lag 0–1 | 0.94 (0.85, 1.04) | 0.27 | 0.93 (0.79, 1.08) | 0.33 |
| Lag 0–2 | 0.95 (0.87, 1.05) | 0.34 | 0.95 (0.82, 1.09) | 0.45 |
| Lag 0–3 | 0.96 (0.87, 1.06) | 0.40 | 0.93 (0.81, 1.08) | 0.36 |
| Lag 0–4 | 0.96 (0.86, 1.06) | 0.39 | 0.94 (0.81, 1.09) | 0.39 |
| Lag 0–5 | 0.96 (0.85, 1.07) | 0.43 | 0.92 (0.79, 1.09) | 0.34 |
| Lag 0–6 | 0.93 (0.82, 1.05) | 0.24 | 0.9 (0.76, 1.07) | 0.24 |
* The stations are Sheffield Centre (urban), Sheffield Tinsley (industrial) and Ladybower (rural).
Figure 5OR (95% CI) for the association of daily RSV admission and average NO concentrations without controlling for relative humidity. (A) Single lags; (B) Average of lags.