Hyun Sun Jeon1, Joon Young Hyon1,2. 1. 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital , Seongnam, Republic of Korea. 2. 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study evaluates the efficacy of 3% diquafosol tetrasodium ophthalmic solution in Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and non-SS dry eye patients unresponsive to conventional artificial tear. METHODS: This retrospective study included 38 dry eye patients (11 with SS and 27 with non-SS) who were treated with 3% diquafosol due to lack of response to artificial tear treatment for more than 3 months. Signs such as tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer-I test, and total ocular staining score (OSS), which consisted of corneal OSS and conjunctival OSS, were evaluated at baseline and the first visit after treatment. Symptoms were quantified using visual analog scale (VAS) and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores. Changes of parameters after treatment in all the patients and differences of changes in SS and non-SS were evaluated. RESULTS: In total population, total OSS and corneal OSS improved average 6 weeks after diquafosol treatment (all P < 0.05, paired t-test), although conjunctival OSS had no improvement. TBUT increased after treatment (P = 0.036), while Schirmer-I test, OSDI, and VAS showed no improvement. With respect to comparisons, total and corneal OSS improved in non-SS patients and TBUT improved in SS patients (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Three percent diquafosol tetrasodium treatment could be considered as an additive or substitute treatment when artificial tear treatment is insufficient, as it improved OSS and TBUT. This study also demonstrated that diquafosol treatment is beneficial for TBUT improvement in SS, while it is beneficial for OSS improvement in non-SS dry eye patients.
PURPOSE: This study evaluates the efficacy of 3% diquafosol tetrasodium ophthalmic solution in Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and non-SS dry eyepatients unresponsive to conventional artificial tear. METHODS: This retrospective study included 38 dry eyepatients (11 with SS and 27 with non-SS) who were treated with 3% diquafosol due to lack of response to artificial tear treatment for more than 3 months. Signs such as tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer-I test, and total ocular staining score (OSS), which consisted of corneal OSS and conjunctival OSS, were evaluated at baseline and the first visit after treatment. Symptoms were quantified using visual analog scale (VAS) and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores. Changes of parameters after treatment in all the patients and differences of changes in SS and non-SS were evaluated. RESULTS: In total population, total OSS and corneal OSS improved average 6 weeks after diquafosol treatment (all P < 0.05, paired t-test), although conjunctival OSS had no improvement. TBUT increased after treatment (P = 0.036), while Schirmer-I test, OSDI, and VAS showed no improvement. With respect to comparisons, total and corneal OSS improved in non-SS patients and TBUT improved in SS patients (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Three percent diquafosol tetrasodium treatment could be considered as an additive or substitute treatment when artificial tear treatment is insufficient, as it improved OSS and TBUT. This study also demonstrated that diquafosol treatment is beneficial for TBUT improvement in SS, while it is beneficial for OSS improvement in non-SS dry eyepatients.