| Literature DB >> 27294384 |
Phanchita Vejchasarn1,2, Jonathan P Lynch1, Kathleen M Brown3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low phosphorus availability is a major factor limiting rice productivity. Since root traits determine phosphorus acquisition efficiency, they are logical selection targets for breeding rice with higher productivity in low phosphorus soils. Before using these traits for breeding, it is necessary to identify genetic variation and to assess the plasticity of each trait in response to the environment. In this study, we measured phenotypic variation and effect of phosphorus deficiency on root architectural, morphological and anatomical traits in 15 rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes. Rice plants were grown with diffusion-limited phosphorus using solid-phase buffered phosphorus to mimic realistic phosphorus availability conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Aerenchyma; Lateral roots; Oryza sativa; Phosphorus; Root anatomy; Root hairs; Stele; Xylem
Year: 2016 PMID: 27294384 PMCID: PMC4905936 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-016-0102-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Rice cultivars (Oryza sativa) used for evaluation of phosphorus effects on root phenotypes
| Cultivar Name | Country of origin | Sub-population | Varietal group | GSORa ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR 64 | Philippines |
|
| GSOR#312010 |
| Pokkali | Sri-Lanka |
|
| GSOR#312020 |
| Patnai 23 | India |
|
| GSOR#301118 |
| Leung Pratew | Thailand |
|
| GSOR#301094 |
| Kasalath | India |
|
| GSOR#301077 |
| Jhona 349 | India |
|
| GSOR#301071 |
| Dular | India |
|
| GSOR#301044 |
| Aichi Asahi | Japan |
|
| GSOR#301002 |
| Nipponbare | Japan |
|
| GSOR#301164 |
| BicoBranco | Brazil |
|
| GSOR#301014 |
| Basmati | Pakistan |
|
| GSOR#301011 |
| Dom-sofid | Iran |
|
| GSOR#301042 |
| Moroberekan | Guinea |
|
| GSOR#301100 |
| Cocodrie | United States |
|
| GSOR#301379 |
| Azucena | Philippines |
|
| GSOR#301165 |
a USDA genetic stock identification number
The effects of axial position and genotype on root hair traits
| Root hair length (mm) | Root hair density (hairs · mm−2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d.f. | F | P | F | P | |
| Axial Position (AP) | 2 | 20.959 | <0.001 | 11.523 | <0.001 |
| Genotype | 14 | 22.129 | <0.001 | 2.585 | 0.003 |
| AP*Genotype | 28 | 3.015 | <0.001 | 0.399 | 0.996 |
| AP | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| Tip (5 cm) | 0.225 a | 0.005 | 208.5 a | 2.2 | |
| Middle (10 cm) | 0.264 b | 0.005 | 221.1 b | 2.4 | |
| Base (15 cm) | 0.263 b | 0.005 | 222.4 b | 2.2 | |
Analysis of variance, means and standard errors (SE) are shown for root hair traits measured at different axial positions: tip (0–5 cm), middle (5–10 cm), and base (10–15 cm) from the root apex. Different letters indicate significant differences among axial positions by the least significant difference (LSD) test (P < 0.05)
The effects of axial position and genotype on anatomical traits
| d.f. | TCA (mm2) | AA (mm2) | %AA | LCA (mm2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
| Axial Position (AP) | 3 | 1.450 | 0.230 | 56.266 | <0.001 | 188.553 | <0.001 | 14.923 | <0.001 |
| Genotype | 14 | 29.891 | <0.001 | 6.997 | <0.001 | 0.923 | 0.535 | 10.088 | <0.001 |
| AP*Genotype | 42 | 7.224 | <0.001 | 2.181 | 0.001 | 3.138 | <0.001 | 7.947 | <0.001 |
| Axial Positions | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| 5 cm | 0.768a | 0.038 | 0.072a | 0.063 | 8.61a | 0.92 | 0.696c | 0.032 | |
| 10 cm | 0.813a | 0.042 | 0.253b | 0.109 | 30.88b | 0.84 | 0.559b | 0.029 | |
| 15 cm | 0.792a | 0.045 | 0.349c | 0.120 | 44.87c | 0.93 | 0.443a | 0.030 | |
| base | 0.706a | 0.026 | 0.213b | 0.108 | 29.72b | 1.53 | 0.493ab | 0.020 | |
| TSA (mm2) | MXV | MXA (mm2) | WC (m4 · 10−20) | ||||||
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
| AP | 3 | 0.807 | 0.492 | 3.489 | 0.017 | 4.833 | 0.003 | 3.459 | 0.018 |
| Genotype | 14 | 47.401 | <0.001 | 26.655 | <0.001 | 21.634 | <0.001 | 32.137 | <0.001 |
| AP*Genotype | 42 | 4.167 | <0.001 | 7.267 | <0.001 | 3.619 | <0.001 | 5.683 | <0.001 |
| Axial Positions | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| 5 cm | 0.072a | 0.004 | 5.02a | 0.178 | 0.0015b | 0.000077 | 149.18b | 18.075 | |
| 10 cm | 0.081a | 0.005 | 5.20a | 0.200 | 0.0016b | 0.000081 | 162.92b | 19.669 | |
| 15 cm | 0.076a | 0.004 | 5.36ab | 0.163 | 0.0015b | 0.000080 | 161.78b | 20.938 | |
| base | 0.074a | 0.003 | 5.82b | 0.191 | 0.0012a | 0.000058 | 94.27a | 8.091 | |
Analysis of variance, means and standard errors (SE) are shown for total cortical area (TCA), aerenchyma area (AA), percent aerenchyma (%AA), living cortical area (LCA), total stele area (TSA), number of late-metaxylem vessels (MXV), median area of the late-metaxylem vessels (MXA), and water conductance (WC) measured at 5, 10 and 15 cm from the root apex and at 1 cm from the root base. Letters indicate significant differences among axial positions by the least significant difference (LSD) test (P < 0.05)
Fig. 1Distribution of aerenchyma area and water conductance among genotypes and sampling positions. Samples were taken close to the base and at 5, 10 or 15 cm from a nodal root tip. Values shown are means of three replications. See Table 3 for statistical analyses
Fig. 2P effect on shoot P content. Plants were harvested at V8 for P analysis. Values shown are means of three replications ± SE. See Table 4 for statistical analysis
The effects of genotype and phosphorus treatment on shoot and root morphological traits
| d.f. | Shoot biomass (g · plant−1) | Plant height (cm) | Number of tillers (plant−1) | Root dry weight (g · plant−1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
| Genotype (G) | 14 | 3.807 | <0.001 | 25.907 | <0.001 | 5.285 | <0.001 | 5.684 | <0.001 |
| Treatment (P) | 1 | 82.269 | <0.001 | 9.979 | 0.002 | 33.657 | <0.001 | 1.874 | 0.175 |
| G * P | 14 | 4.808 | <0.001 | 0.910 | 0.553 | 7.660 | <0.001 | 1.630 | 0.097 |
| Treatments | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| HP | 6.21 | 0.232 | 100.44 | 2.013 | 5.69 | 0.361 | 1.581 | 0.109 | |
| LP | 3.61 | 0.169 | 91.47 | 2.006 | 3.37 | 0.169 | 1.343 | 0.135 | |
| Mean | 4.91 | 0.199 | 95.96 | 1.491 | 4.53 | 0.233 | 1.462 | 0.087 | |
| d.f | Root hair length (mm) | Root hair density (hairs · mm−2) | Nodal root number (plant−1) | Root:shoot ratio | |||||
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
| Genotype (G) | 14 | 7.202 | <0.001 | 1.849 | 0.047 | 2.239 | 0.013 | 2.272 | 0.012 |
| Treatment (P) | 1 | 26.228 | <0.001 | 47.354 | <0.001 | 110.074 | <0.001 | 14.060 | <0.001 |
| G * P | 14 | 0.341 | 0.985 | 0.542 | 0.898 | 2.696 | 0.004 | 1.293 | 0.239 |
| Treatments | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| HP | 0.214 | 0.005 | 213.958 | 2.875 | 88.67 | 2.32 | 0.251 | 0.012 | |
| LP | 0.251 | 0.005 | 238.051 | 1.998 | 58.71 | 1.66 | 0.355 | 0.025 | |
| Mean | 0.232 | 0.004 | 226.005 | 2.159 | 73.69 | 2.13 | 0.303 | 0.015 | |
| d.f | Small lateral root length (cm) | Large lateral root length (cm) | Lateral root density | Shoot P content (mg · plant−1) | |||||
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
| Genotype (G) | 14 | 4.491 | <0.001 | 2.596 | 0.004 | 1.70 | 0.073 | 0.848 | 0.616 |
| Treatment (P) | 1 | 37.796 | <0.001 | 67.354 | <0.001 | 85.971 | <0.001 | 142.801 | <0.001 |
| G * P | 14 | 2.655 | 0.004 | 1.291 | 0.240 | 1.35 | 0.207 | 2.198 | 0.018 |
| Treatments | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| HP | 94.098 | 5.708 | 236.289 | 8.876 | 48.98 | 1.12 | 14.45 | 0.752 | |
| LP | 48.537 | 4.727 | 140.640 | 7.553 | 36.49 | 0.75 | 4.59 | 0.341 | |
| Mean | 71.318 | 4.405 | 188.465 | 7.699 | 42.73 | 0.94 | 9.52 | 0.664 | |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA), means and standard error (SE) values are shown for 15 genotypes grown with high (100 μM; HP) or low phosphorus (2 μM; LP) treatments
Fig. 3Relationship of shoot dry weights between high P and low P treatments. Genotypes in the upper right quadrant were vigorous under both P levels
Fig. 4Effect of genotype and P treatment on root branching. Values shown are means of three replications ± SE for nodal root number, small lateral root length and the proportion of total lateral root length as small lateral roots. See Table 4 for statistical analyses
Allometric analyses of root traits in plants grown with high or low Pk
| High P | Low P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable name | R2 | α | R2 | α |
| Small lateral root lengtha | 0.287* | 0.361 | 0.241* | 0.347 |
| Large lateral root lengtha | 0.345* | 0.682 | 0.177* | 0.471 |
| Lateral root densitya | 0.063 | 0.503 | 0.013 | 0.323 |
| Nodal root numbera | 0.309 | 0.929 | 0.218 | 0.916 |
| TCA2 | 0.996* | 0.988 | 0.992* | 0.982 |
| TSA2 | 0.759* | 0.753 | 0.616* | 0.580 |
| AA2 | 0.699* | 0.690 | 0.657* | 0.634 |
| %AAb | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.047 |
| MXVb | 0.202* | 0.579 | 0.225* | 0.641 |
| MXAb | 0.001 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 0.029 |
| WCPb | 0.511* | 0.271 | 0.530* | 0.307 |
The ln of each trait was run against the ln of total DW (lateral roots) or ln of RXSA (anatomical traits). The allometric scaling exponent α was calculated from the slope of the linear relationship. Significant regressions are indicated by *
aAgainst the ln of total plant dry weight
bAgainst the ln root cross-sectional area
Fig. 5Increases in root hair length and density with low P treatment. Percent changes were calculated from three replications per genotype and treatment
Fig. 6Effects of genotype and phosphorus treatment on total cortical area and total stele area. Values shown are means of three replications ± SE. See Table 6 for statistical analyses
The effects of genotype and phosphorus treatment on anatomical traits
| d.f. | RXSA (mm2) | TSA (mm2) | TCA (mm2) | TCA:RXSA Ratio | LCA (mm2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
| Genotype (G) | 14 | 44.001 | <0.001 | 27.366 | <0.001 | 34.778 | <0.001 | 2.695 | 0.003 | 14.034 | <0.001 |
| Treatment (P) | 1 | 5.564 | 0.021 | 1.886 | 0.173 | 6.996 | 0.010 | 21.756 | <0.001 | 17.178 | <0.001 |
| G * P | 14 | 1.954 | 0.038 | 3.727 | <0.001 | 2.041 | 0.029 | 1.429 | 0.168 | 3.001 | 0.002 |
| Treatments | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| HP | 1.035 | 0.052 | 0.066 | 0.004 | 0.962 | 0.049 | 0.929 | 0.003 | 0.656 | 0.035 | |
| LP | 0.876 | 0.043 | 0.074 | 0.004 | 0.796 | 0.039 | 0.908 | 0.004 | 0.477 | 0.026 | |
| Mean | 0.955 | 0.035 | 0.070 | 0.003 | 0.879 | 0.033 | 0.919 | 0.003 | 0.566 | 0.024 | |
| d.f | AA (mm2) | %AA | MXA (mm2) | MXV (counts) | WC (m4 · 10−20) | ||||||
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
| Genotype (G) | 14 | 30.346 | <0.001 | 4.225 | <0.001 | 16.118 | <0.001 | 50.071 | <0.001 | 29.836 | <0.001 |
| Treatment (P) | 1 | 0.241 | 0.625 | 26.059 | <0.001 | 0.010 | 0.920 | 0.256 | 0.614 | 0.025 | 0.875 |
| G * P | 14 | 0.712 | 0.754 | 1.559 | 0.118 | 2.197 | 0.018 | 0.605 | 0.850 | 1.381 | 0.191 |
| Treatments | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| HP | 0.306 | 0.018 | 31.837 | 0.918 | 0.00153 | 0.00008 | 5.49 | 0.195 | 162.209 | 21.298 | |
| LP | 0.319 | 0.020 | 39.991 | 1.307 | 0.00155 | 0.00008 | 5.36 | 0.177 | 157.718 | 19.018 | |
| Mean | 0.313 | 0.013 | 35.914 | 0.904 | 0.00154 | 0.00006 | 5.42 | 0.131 | 159.963 | 14.198 | |
Analysis of variance, means and standard deviation (SE) values are shown for root cross-section area (RXSA), total stele area (TSA) total root cortical area (TCA), proportion of TCA, living cortical area (LCA), aerenchyma area (AA) and percent (%AA), median late metaxylem vessel area (MXA), number of late metaxylem vessels (MXV), and the water conductance (WC) in 15 O. sativa accessions evaluated under high (100 μM, HP) and low phosphorus (2 μM, LP) treatments
Fig. 7Effects of genotype and P treatment on percent aerenchyma, median metaxylem area and water conductance. Values shown are means of three replications ± SE. See Table 6 for statistical analyses