| Literature DB >> 27293754 |
William A Hopkins1, Jesse A Fallon1, Michelle L Beck1, Brittney H Coe1, Catherine M B Jachowski1.
Abstract
Disease is among the leading causes of the global decline in amphibian populations. In North America, parasites and pathogens are among the factors implicated in precipitous population declines of the giant hellbender salamander (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis), but the incidence of infections and the responses of hellbenders to infections remain poorly studied. Here, we document the prevalence of leech and trypanosome infections in a wild population of eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) and describe haematological and immunological characteristics of hellbenders harbouring these infections. We hypothesized that hellbenders parasitized by trypanosomes would be anaemic, that individuals infected with either or both parasites would exhibit shifts in white blood cell counts and that hellbenders infected with leeches would exhibit altered plasma bactericidal capacity. We found that 24 and 68% of hellbenders in our sample population were infected with leeches and trypanosomes, respectively, and 20% were co-infected with both parasites. We found no evidence suggestive of anaemia among infected individuals. However, hellbenders infected with either or both parasites exhibited marked shifts in circulating white blood cells that were consistent with predictable responses to parasitic infection. Additionally, we found that hellbenders harbouring leeches had much higher plasma bactericidal capacity than individuals without leeches, and we offer multiple potential mechanistic explanations for this observation. We also found evidence that cellular and serological immune responses to parasites were less robust in juvenile than adult hellbenders. This finding warrants further investigation in light of the demographic characteristics, specifically the scarcity of juvenile age classes, of hellbender populations where disease is a possible contributor to declines. Finally, we describe two methodological advances that will improve future studies seeking to diagnose trypanosome infections and to test the bactericidal capacity of hellbenders and perhaps other amphibians. Our study provides fundamental insights into how hellbenders respond physiologically to endo- and ectoparasites, which could ultimately prove useful for their conservation.Entities:
Keywords: Amphibian; anaemia; co-infection; leech; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; trypanosome
Year: 2016 PMID: 27293754 PMCID: PMC4801058 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cow002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Figure 1:Comparison of different slide preparation techniques for detecting trypanosomes in eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) using light microscopy. (A) Detection of trypanosomes is relatively poor using standard blood smears regardless of the number of fields of view (FOV) compared with smears prepared with the buffy coat. (B) Relationship between the number of trypanosomes (# Tryps) detected in standard smears and buffy coat smears (both from 50 FOV). Standard smears are offset slightly (+0.1) for visual purposes. Note the large range in trypanosome infection intensities that remain undiagnosed using standard smears.
Figure 2:Prevalence of leech and trypanosome infections in eastern hellbenders (C. alleganiensis alleganiensis). Trypanosome infections were diagnosed using buffy coat smears. One individual without leeches had unreadable buffy coat slides and is not included in the figures. (A) Percentage of hellbenders collected that harboured leech and/or trypanosome infections. (B) Trypanosome infections were significantly more prevalent in adults than in juveniles.
Haematological characteristics of eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) from a population in southwest Virginia, USA
| Infection status | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neither | Trypanosomes | Leeches | Co-infected | |||
| Parameter | No ( | Yes ( | No ( | Yes ( | ||
| PCV (%) | 29.49 ± 1.92 | 30.30 ± 1.53 | 32.12 ± 1.06 | 30.89 ± 0.99 | 32.55 ± 1.75 | 32.52 ± 2.25 |
| RBC count (/ml) | 68 244 ± 5019 | 69 421 ± 4586 | 64 374 ± 3182 | 64 860 ± 3014 | 66 945 ± 5326 | 66 068 ± 5889 |
| Hb (g/100 ml) | 7.99 ± 0.45 | 7.73 ± 0.41 | 8.43 ± 0.29 | 8.22 ± 0.28 | 7.91 ± 0.49 | 8.41 ± 0.53 |
| MCV (fL) | 4441 ± 266 | 4489 ± 249 | 5124 ± 173 | 4929 ± 170 | 4947 ± 301 | 4973 ± 312 |
| MCHC (g/dl) | 27.31 ± 0.88 | 25.91 ± 0.91 | 26.44 ± 0.63 | 26.78 ± 0.56 | 24.74 ± 0.99 | 26.22 ± 1.03 |
| TPP (g/100 ml) | 2.46 ± 0.11 | 2.69 ± 0.17 | 2.75 ± 0.12 | 2.66 ± 0.11 | 2.85 ± 0.19 | 2.63 ± 0.13 |
| Percentage of neutrophils | 25.36 ± 1.68 | 25.31 ± 1.52 | 30.67 ± 1.06 | 28.23 ± 1.07 | 30.60 ± 1.89 | 32.00 ± 1.98 |
| Percentage of lymphocytes | 62.09 ± 2.38 | 60.54 ± 2.36 | 50.07 ± 1.64 | 55.68 ± 1.64 | 47.30 ± 2.88 | 46.13 ± 2.79 |
| Percentage of eosinophils | 12.36 ± 2.19 | 13.92 ± 1.87 | 18.67 ± 1.30 | 15.74 ± 1.18 | 21.30 ± 2.08 | 21.00 ± 2.57 |
| N:L Ratio | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 0.67 ± 0.06 | 0.71 ± 0.06 |
| BKA (%; fresh) | 35.30 ± 6.81 | 40.53 ± 6.43 | 48.54 ± 4.46 | 40.08 ± 3.82 | 62.19 ± 6.73 | 60.42 ± 7.99 |
Values are reported based on the infection status of individuals; note that the same individuals are recategorized for trypanosome and leech infection status. Least-squares means (±1 SEM) corrected for body size (snout–vent length) are presented for PCV, RBC, Hb, MCV, MCHC and TPP. Arithmetic means (±1 SEM) are presented for the remaining variables because body size did not influence these parameters. Abbreviations: BKA, bacterial killing ability; Hb, blood haemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCHC, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; N:L ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PCV, packed cell volume; RBC, red blood cell; and TPP, total plasma protein.
Figure 3:Influence of age/sex class and infection status on blood parameters related to immunity of eastern hellbenders (C. alleganiensis alleganiensis). (A) Mean (±1 SEM) white blood cell principal component 1 (PC1) scores, which included high positive factor loadings for the percentage of neutrophils, percentage of eosinophils and N:L ratio as well as a high negative loading for the percentage of lymphocytes. (B) Mean white blood cell PC1 scores based on the infection status of individuals. Note that the same individuals were reclassified according to their trypanosome and leech infection status.
Figure 4:Influence of age/sex class and infection status on the bactericidal capacity of freshly collected plasma (day 0, unfrozen) from eastern hellbenders (C. alleganiensis alleganiensis). (A) Mean (±1 SEM) bactericidal capacity expressed as the percentage of killing of the three age/sex classes. (B) Mean (±1 SEM) bactericidal capacity based on the infection status of individuals. Note that the same individuals were reclassified according to their trypanosome and leech infection status.
Results from generalized linear model selection examining the effects of infection status, body size and age/sex class (class) on blood and immune parameters in eastern hellbenders
| Response | Model | AICc | ΔAICc | Model weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBCPC1 | β + SVL | 109.72 | 0 | 0.540 |
| β + trypanosome + SVL | 112.09 | 2.37 | 0.165 | |
| β + leech + SVL | 112.11 | 2.39 | 0.163 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech + SVL | 114.65 | 4.93 | 0.046 | |
| β | 114.90 | 5.18 | 0.041 | |
| β + leech | 116.96 | 7.24 | 0.014 | |
| β + trypanosome | 117.11 | 7.39 | 0.013 | |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech + SVL | 117.42 | 7.70 | 0.012 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech | 119.36 | 9.63 | 0.004 | |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech | 121.93 | 12.21 | 0.001 | |
| RBCPC2 | β + SVL | 117.65 | 0 | 0.152 |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech | 117.68 | 0.03 | 0.150 | |
| β | 117.79 | 0.14 | 0.142 | |
| β + trypanosome + SVL | 118.40 | 0.75 | 0.105 | |
| β + trypanosome | 118.41 | 0.75 | 0.104 | |
| β + leech | 118.73 | 1.07 | 0.089 | |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech + SVL | 118.74 | 1.08 | 0.088 | |
| β + leech + SVL | 119.0 | 1.35 | 0.078 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech | 119.9 | 2.20 | 0.051 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech + SVL | 120.2 | 2.58 | 0.042 | |
| TPP | β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech + SVL | 74.55 | 0 | 0.612 |
| β + SVL | 76.70 | 2.15 | 0.209 | |
| β + leech + SVL | 78.44 | 3.89 | 0.088 | |
| β + trypanosome + SVL | 79.10 | 4.54 | 0.063 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech + SVL | 81.04 | 6.48 | 0.024 | |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech | 85.95 | 11.39 | 0.002 | |
| β | 88.56 | 14.01 | 0.001 | |
| β + leech | 89.09 | 14.53 | 0.0004 | |
| β + trypanosome | 90.80 | 16.25 | 0.0002 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech | 92.20 | 17.65 | 0.0001 | |
| WBCPC1 | β + trypanosome + leech | 106.66 | 0 | 0.306 |
| β + trypanosome + class | 107.54 | 0.88 | 0.197 | |
| β + trypanosome | 107.81 | 1.15 | 0.173 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech + class | 107.91 | 1.25 | 0.164 | |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech | 109.18 | 2.52 | 0.087 | |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech + class | 110.87 | 4.21 | 0.037 | |
| β + leech + class | 112.61 | 5.95 | 0.016 | |
| β + class | 112.77 | 6.11 | 0.014 | |
| β + leech | 115.04 | 8.38 | 0.005 | |
| β | 117.28 | 10.62 | 0.002 | |
| BKA | β + leech + class | 362.65 | 0 | 0.369 |
| β + leech | 363.39 | 0.73 | 0.256 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech | 365.36 | 2.70 | 0.095 | |
| β + trypanosome + leech + class | 365.40 | 2.75 | 0.093 | |
| β + class | 366.14 | 3.49 | 0.065 | |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech | 367.09 | 4.44 | 0.040 | |
| β + leech + trypanosome + trypanosome × leech + class | 367.55 | 4.90 | 0.032 | |
| β | 368.38 | 5.73 | 0.021 | |
| β + trypanosome + class | 368.76 | 6.10 | 0.017 | |
| β + trypanosome | 369.63 | 6.98 | 0.011 |
Abbreviations: BKA, bacterial killing ability; RBCPC1, red blood cell principal component 1; RBCPC2, red blood cell principal component 2; SVL, snout–vent length; TPP, total plasma protein; WBCPC1, white blood cell principal component 1; AICc, Akaike's information criteria corrected for small sample sizes; and ΔAICc, the difference between a model's mean AICc value and the mean AICc value of the best fit model.
Model averaged parameter estimates and standard errors from the 90% confidence set for hellbender blood and immune parameters
| Response | Parameter | Parameter estimate | Standard error |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBCPC1 | Leech | 0.021 | 0.075 |
| Trypanosome | 0.022 | 0.070 | |
| SVL | 0.060 | 0.021 | |
| RBCPC2 | Leech | 0.515 | 0.617 |
| Trypanosome | 0.281 | 0.218 | |
| SVL | 0.016 | 0.011 | |
| Trypanosome × leech | −0.459 | 0.647 | |
| TPP | Leech | 0.898 | 0.451 |
| Trypanosome | 0.204 | 0.138 | |
| SVL | 0.053 | 0.013 | |
| Trypanosome × leech | −0.984 | 0.458 | |
| WBCPC1 | Leech | 0.348 | 0.249 |
| Trypanosome | 0.952 | 0.297 | |
| Age/sex class | −0.166 | 0.170 | |
| Trypanosome × leech | −0.021 | 0.071 | |
| BKA | Leech | −9.395 | 3.898 |
| Trypanosome | −0.190 | 1.572 | |
| Age/sex class | −3.564 | 5.296 | |
| Trypanosome × leech | −0.187 | 0.926 |
Abbreviations: BKA, bacterial killing ability; RBCPC1, red blood cell principal component 1; RBCPC2, red blood cell principal component 2; SVL, snout–vent length; TPP, total plasma protein; and WBCPC1, white blood cell principal component 1.
Figure 5:Stability of bactericidal capacity of plasma after storage at −80°C. Plasma was collected from eastern hellbenders (C. alleganiensis alleganiensis) and bactericidal capacity determined in fresh plasma (day 0) and again after 21 and 56 days in the freezer. The figure displays the mean (±1 SEM) of n = 21 adult females and nine adult males at all three time points.