| Literature DB >> 27293710 |
Kimberly Maute1, Kristine French1, Sarah Legge2, Lee Astheimer3, Stephen Garnett4.
Abstract
Conservation agencies are often faced with the difficult task of prioritizing what recovery actions receive support. With the number of species under threat of decline growing globally, research that informs conservation priorities is greatly needed. The relative vulnerability of cryptic or nomadic species is often uncertain, because populations are difficult to monitor and local populations often seem stable in the short term. This uncertainty can lead to inaction when populations are in need of protection. We tested the feasibility of using differences in condition indices as an indication of population vulnerability to decline for related threatened Australian finch sub-species. The Gouldian finch represents a relatively well-studied endangered species, which has a seasonal and site-specific pattern of condition index variation that differs from the closely related non-declining long-tailed finch. We used Gouldian and long-tailed finch condition variation as a model to compare with lesser studied, threatened star and black-throated finches. We compared body condition (fat and muscle scores), haematocrit and stress levels (corticosterone) among populations, seasons and years to determine whether lesser studied finch populations matched the model of an endangered species or a non-declining species. While vulnerable finch populations often had lower muscle and higher fat and corticosterone concentrations during moult (seasonal pattern similar to Gouldian finches), haematocrit values did not differ among populations in a predictable way. Star and black-throated finch populations, which were predicted to be vulnerable to decline, showed evidence of poor condition during moult, supporting their status as vulnerable. Our findings highlight how measures of condition can provide insight into the relative vulnerability of animal and plant populations to decline and will allow the prioritization of efforts towards the populations most likely to be in jeopardy of extinction.Entities:
Keywords: Condition; corticosterone; fat; haematocrit; muscle; season
Year: 2015 PMID: 27293710 PMCID: PMC4778451 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cov025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Characteristics of finch monitoring sites and predictions of population vulnerability to decline
| Species | Property name | Conservation status | Grazing level | Burning regimen | Predicted vulnerability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gouldian finch | Delamere Station | Endangered | High | No fire | Vulnerable |
| Gouldian finch | Bradshaw FTA | Endangered | Low | Moderate, patchy | Vulnerable |
| Long-tailed finch | Delamere Station | Least concern | High | No fire | Not vulnerable |
| Long-tailed finch | Bradshaw FTA | Least concern | Low | Moderate, patchy | Not vulnerable |
| Star finch | Rinyirru (Lakefield) NP | Near threatened | Moderate | Not frequent enough | Vulnerable |
| Star finch | Pormpurraaw | Near threatened | High, patchy | Frequent, patchy | Not vulnerable |
| Black-throated finch | Laudham Park Station | Threatened | High | Not frequent enough | Vulnerable |
| Black-throated finch | Rinyirru (Lakefield) NP | Least concern | Low | Moderate, patchy | Not vulnerable |
Predictions are based on the subjective assessment of grazing levels and burning regimens as detrimental to each finch species and population. Abbreviations: FTA, field training area; NP, national park.
Figure 1:Regression of total corticosterone (in nanograms per millilitre) against handling time (time since capture) using pooled data for all species, seasons, years and sites.
Results of mixed model restricted maximum likelihood analysis evaluating the effects of population vulnerability (vulnerable or not vulnerable), season (breeding or moult) and year (year 1 or year 2) on condition indices (n = 240)
| Condition index | Muscle score | Fat score | Haematocrit | Residual corticosterone | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor(s) | d.f. | ||||||||
| Vulnerability | 1 | 0.001 | 0.97 | 3.38 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 0.62 |
| Season | 1 | 29.12 | <0.0001 | 29.28 | <0.0001 | 1.71 | 0.19 | 104.35 | <0.0001 |
| Year | 1 | 0.17 | 0.68 | 24.08 | <0.0001 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 12.65 | 0.0004 |
| Vulnerability × season | 1 | 0.61 | 0.43 | 2.68 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.73 | 15.72 | <0.0001 |
| Vulnerability × year | 1 | 0.17 | 0.68 | 0.02 | 0.90 | 1.07 | 0.30 | 0.006 | 0.94 |
| Season × year | 1 | 0.26 | 0.61 | 57.00 | <0.0001 | 1.28 | 0.26 | 24.50 | <0.0001 |
| Season × year × vulnerability | 1 | 3.24 | 0.07 | 1.01 | 0.31 | 0.10 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.37 |
Species (Gouldian, long-tailed, star and black-throated finch) was included as a random factor, to account for differences in condition measures among species.
Figure 2:Differences in mean muscle scores among populations (vulnerable or not vulnerable), seasons (moult or breeding) and years (year 1 or year 2). Bars represent means ± SEM. *Significant differences between season values based on Student's paired t-tests, P < 0.05.
Figure 3:Differences in mean fat scores among seasons (moult or breeding) and years (year 1 or year 2). Bars represent means ± SEM. *Significant differences between season values based on Student's paired t-tests, P < 0.05.
Figure 4:Differences in mean residual corticosterone (CORT; in nanograms per millilitre) among seasons (moult or breeding) during 2 years (a) and between vulnerable and not-vulnerable populations (b). Bars represent means ± SEM. *Significant differences between seasons based on Student's paired t-tests, P < 0.05.