| Literature DB >> 27293708 |
Jennifer L Hurley-Sanders1, Jay F Levine2, Stacy A C Nelson3, J M Law2, William J Showers4, Michael K Stoskopf5.
Abstract
We used (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to describe key metabolites of the polar metabolome of the freshwater mussel, Elliptio complanata. Principal components analysis documented variability across tissue types and river of origin in mussels collected from two rivers in North Carolina (USA). Muscle, digestive gland, mantle and gill tissues yielded identifiable but overlapping metabolic profiles. Variation in digestive gland metabolic profiles between the two mussel collection sites was characterized by differences in mono- and disaccharides. Variation in mantle tissue metabolomes appeared to be associated with sex. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is a sensitive means to detect metabolites in the tissues of E. complanata and holds promise as a tool for the investigation of freshwater mussel health and physiology.Entities:
Keywords: Freshwater mussels; metabolites; nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Year: 2015 PMID: 27293708 PMCID: PMC4778454 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cov023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Shell measurements (length, height and width) and median measurements for sampled Elliptio complanata (in millimetres)
| Length | Height | Width | Length | Height | Width | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH1 | 59 | 32 | 19 | E1* | 65 | 42 | 25 |
| NH2 | 61 | 36 | 19 | E2 | 64 | 39 | 23 |
| NH3 | 70 | 42 | 21 | E3* | 72 | 41 | 23 |
| NH4 | 58 | 33 | 22 | E4 | 58 | 33 | 22 |
| NH5 | 69 | 40 | 24 | E5* | 69 | 40 | 24 |
| Median | 61 | 36 | 21 | Median | 65 | 40 | 23 |
Abbreviations: E, Eno River; NH, New Hope Creek. *Non-gravid female; all other mussels were male.
Figure 1:Representative 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of each tissue from one individual.
Suggested major metabolites and peak assignments
| Metabolites | Chemical shift and peak shape (ppm)* | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Amino acids | ||
| Alanine | 1.46(d), 3.76(m) | [0] [1] [2] |
| Arginine | 1.68(m), 1.90(m), 3.23(m), 3.74(m) | [0] [1] [3] |
| Glutamate | 2.08(m), 2.34(m), 3.74(t) | [0] [1] [3] [6] [10] |
| Glycine | 3.54(s) | [0] [1] [3] |
| Isoleucine | 0.92(t), 1.00(d), 1.26(m), 1.44(m), 1.96(m), 3.66(d) | [0] [1] [3] [4] |
| Leucine | 0.94(d), 0.96(d), 1.66(m), 3.71(t) | [0] [1] [3] [4] |
| Serine | 3.84(m), 3.96(m) | [0] [1] [4] [10] |
| Taurine | 3.25(t), 3.42(t) | [1] [5] |
| Valine | 0.98(d), 1.03(d), 2.25(m), 3.59(d) | [0] [1] [3] [4] |
| Energy-related substances | ||
| Glucose | 3.23(dd), 3.40(m), 3.46(m), 3.52(dd), 3.73(m), 3.82(m), 3.88(dd), 4.63(d), 5.22(d) | [0] [1] [4] [10] |
| Glycogen | 3.40(m), 3.60(m), 3.80(m), 3.96(br.s.), 5.40(br.s.) | [1] [2] [10] |
| Maltose | 3.27(dd), 3.41(t), 3.58(m), 3.62(m), 3.66(m), 3.70(m), 3.76(m), 3.84(m), 3.90(dd), 3.93(d), 3.96(m), 5.22(d), 5.40(d) | [0] [10] |
| ADP | 4.15(m), 4.16(m), 4.57(m), 5.94(m), 8.29(s), 8.54(s) | [1] [4] [6] |
| ATP | 4.21(m), 4.28(m), 4.39(m), 4.51(m), 4.62(t), 6.13(d), 8.24(s), 8.53(s) | [1] [4] [6] |
| Acetate | 1.91(s) | [2] |
| Ketoglutarate | 2.43(t), 3.00(t) | [0] [3] [6] |
| Pyruvate | 2.46(s) | [2] |
| Lactate | 1.32(d), 4.10(q) | [0] [2] [10] |
| Osmolytes and organic acids | ||
| Betaine | 3.25(s), 3.89(s) | [1] [4] |
| β-Alanine | 2.55(t), 3.18(t) | [0] [1] |
| γ-Aminobutyric acid | 1.89(m), 2.28(t), 3.00(t) | [0] [9] [10] |
| Krebs cycle intermediates | ||
| Succinate | 2.41(s) | [1] [7] |
| Fumarate | 6.51(s) | [0] [7] |
| Fatty acid metabolism | ||
| Malonate | 3.11(s) | [7] |
| Carnitine | 2.43(dd), 3.21(s), 3.42(m), 4.56(2) | [0] [1] |
| Polyamine metabolism | ||
| Cadaverine | 1.45(m), 1.71(m), 3.01(t) | [8] |
| Ornithine | 1.73(m), 1.83(m), 1.93(m), 3.05(t), 3.77(t) | [4] |
| Putrescine | 1.75(m), 3.04(t) | [4] |
| Unknown | ||
| Unknown 1 | 0.92 (0.8–0.93; multiple overlapping peaks) | |
| Unknown peak 2 | 2.05(br.s) | |
| Unknown peak 3 | 2.39(t) | |
| Unknown peak 4 | 2.64(t) | |
| Unknown peak 5 | 2.84(m) | |
| Unknown peak 6 | 3.19(s) | |
| Unknown peak 7 | 3.24(m) | |
| Unknown peak 8 | 3.63(br.s) | |
Abbreviations: br.s, broad singlet; d, doublet; dd, doublet of doublets; m, multiplet; s, singlet; t, triplet.
[0] Leonard ); [1] Tikunov ); [2] Gäde and Wilps (1975); [3] Hanson and Dietz (1976); [4] Spann ); [5] Bedford (1973); [6] Hochachka and Mustafa (1972); [7] Long ); [8] Gasparini and Audit (2000); [9] Gagné ); and [10] Leonard ). *Chemical shifts were identified using the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), Biologic Magnetic Resonance Data Bank (BMRB) and Chenomx NMR Suite 7.6.
Figure 2:Two-component principal components map of all samples from both rivers. Each tissue separated from the other, indicating a characteristic metabolic profile for each tissue. The adductor and foot muscle profiles overlapped, indicating a relationship between the two muscle tissues. The two mantle samples that grouped with the gill samples were both from females; this grouping may be due to seasonal reproductive changes to the mantle tissue.
Figure 3:Loading plot of all tissue samples from both rivers. Blue stars correspond to the scores within the gill grouping; green, digestive gland; purple, mantle; and red, combined adductor and foot muscle.
Figure 4:Tissue-specific two-component principal components map of digestive gland samples. Eno River samples (Eno) group separately from New Hope Creek samples (New Hope), suggesting location-specific effects on the digestive gland metabolome.
Figure 5:Tissue-specific two-component principal components map of mantle samples. Samples from males group separately from samples from females, suggesting gender-specific effects on the mantle metabolome.
Water-quality parameters from the Eno River and New Hope Creek
| Eno River | New Hope Creek | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Conductivity | pH | Turbidity | ODOsat | ODO | Temperature | Conductivity | pH | Turbidity | ODOsat | ODO | |
| (°C) | (mS/cm) | (NTU) | (%) | (mg/l) | (°C) | (mS/cm) | (NTU) | (%) | (mg/l) | |||
| Mean | 18.25 | 0.078 | 7.04 | 5.26 | 84.83 | 8.01 | 16.76 | 0.085 | 7.31 | 14.65 | 96.64 | 9.44 |
| Maximum | 24.7 | 0.189 | 7.22 | 14.9 | 101.1 | 8.86 | 21.2 | 0.103 | 7.62 | 152.2 | 114.2 | 11.9 |
| Median | 18.3 | 0.077 | 7.03 | 5.3 | 84.4 | 8.02 | 16.2 | 0.085 | 7.31 | 10.6 | 99.35 | 9.68 |
| Minimum | 14.2 | 0.009 | 6.52 | 0 | 81.1 | 7.04 | 13.3 | 0.002 | 7.16 | 0 | 83 | 7.69 |
| SD | 2.95 | 0.007 | 0.07 | 4.32 | 2.4 | 0.49 | 2.56 | 0.011 | 0.04 | 17.08 | 6.87 | 1.1 |
| 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | 572 | |
Abbreviation: ODOsat, optical dissolved oxygen saturation; ODO, optical derived oxygen.
Parameters and averages measured by YSI 6920 every 15 min over the span of 1 week between rivers
| Eno River mean | New Hope Creek mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | 572 | 18.25 | 16.76 | <0.001 |
| Conductivity (mS/cm) | 572 | 0.08 | 0.09 | <0.001 |
| pH | 572 | 7.04 | 7.31 | <0.001 |
| Turbidity (NTU) | 572 | 0.14 | 4.55 | <0.001 |
| ODOsat (%) | 572 | 84.83 | 96.63 | <0.001 |
| ODO (mg/l) | 572 | 8.02 | 9.44 | <0.001 |
Abbreviation: ODOsat, optical dissolved oxygen saturation; ODO, optical derived oxygen. All parameters were statistically significantly different between the two rivers at a value of P < 0.001 (Welch’s two-sample t-test).