| Literature DB >> 27293417 |
Takahiko Kawamura1, Toshitaka Umemura2, Hiroyuki Umegaki3, Rui Imamine4, Naoko Kawano5, Hajime Mase4, Asako Mizoguchi4, Makiko Minatoguchi4, Minoru Kusama4, Yu Kouchi4, Atsuko Watarai6, Akio Kanai6, Eitaro Nakashima4, Nigishi Hotta4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We conducted a 3-year longitudinal study concerning factors associated with changes in brain atrophy in elderly diabetic patients.Entities:
Keywords: Brain atrophy; Cerebral small vessel disease; Cognitive impairment; Diabetes mellitus; Renal impairment
Year: 2016 PMID: 27293417 PMCID: PMC4899660 DOI: 10.1159/000443497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra ISSN: 1664-5464
Fig. 1Changes in severity of gray matter atrophy in the VOI (HAI) during the 3-year follow-up in the case of a 78-year-old female. a MRI. Progression of medial temporal lobe atrophy was observed on FLAIR MRI during the 3 years. b VSRAD. Colored areas (colors refer to the online version only) with z-scores of >2 are overlaid as significantly atrophied regions on the standardized MRI template. The target VOI is surrounded by purple lines (white arrows), and red areas indicate higher gray matter atrophy levels as compared with the control (normal database). The HAI (z-score) increased from 1.57 to 3.20, and the MMSE dropped from 23 to 17 after 3 years.
Clinical and biochemical characteristics at baseline and after 3 years of follow-up in elderly diabetic patients
| Baseline | After 3 years | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration of diabetes, years | 21.8 ± 8.8 | – | – |
| Education, years | 9.47 ± 1.80 | – | – |
| ApoE ε4 (yes/no) | 10/56 (15.2%) | – | – |
| Smoking (never/ex-/current) | 43/14/9 | 43/18/5 | – |
| Treatment (diet/OHAs/insulin) | 13/41/12 | 13/41/12 | – |
| Nephropathy (normo-/micro-/macroalbuminuria) | 48/11/7 | 37/22/7 | – |
| Retinopathy (no/simple/proliferative) | 44/10/12 | 46/9/11 | – |
| Body mass index | 23.1 ± 3.8 | 23.2 ± 4.1 | 0.77 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 84.6 ± 11.0 | 85.2 ± 11.4 | 0.54 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 137.5 ± 14.9 | 133.6 ± 18.7 | 0.15 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 74.3 ± 8.3 | 70.8 ± 11.4 | 0.02 |
| RAS blocker use (yes/no) | 42/24 (63.6%) | 45/21 (68.2%) | 0.45 |
| HDL-cholesterol, mg/dl | 57.7 ± 14.9 | 54.0 ± 15.6 | <0.01 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dl | 100.0 (73.0–140.0) | 104.0 (73.0–141.0) | 0.69 |
| LDL-cholesterol, mg/dl | 108.6 ± 21.4 | 103.7 ± 27.5 | 0.13 |
| Statin use (yes/no) | 39/27 (59.1%) | 38/28 (57.6%) | 1.00 |
| Fasting blood glucose, mg/dl | 127.6 ± 32.3 | 132.7 ± 31.0 | 0.36 |
| Fasting insulin | 5.10 (4.00–8.08) | 4.90 (3.20–8.00) | 0.47 |
| HbA1c, % | 7.04 ± 0.77 | 6.92 ± 0.69 | 0.13 |
| Serum creatinine, mg/dl | 0.78 ± 0.23 | 0.86 ± 0.26 | <0.001 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 65.4 ± 15.6 | 59.4 ± 17.8 | <0.001 |
| eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (yes/no) | 23/43 (34.8%) | 36/30 (54.5%) | 0.01 |
| Urinary ACR, mg/g creatinine | 26.0 (15.0–49.0) | 23.0 (15.0–49.0) | 0.48 |
| Albumin, g/dl | 4.24 ± 0.33 | 4.28 ± 0.53 | 0.51 |
| Uric acid, mg/dl | 5.23 ± 1.28 | 5.64 ± 1.50 | <0.01 |
| hs-CRP, mg/l | 0.30 (0.20–0.80) | 0.44 (0.25–1.53) | 0.11 |
| sICAM-1, μg/l | 203.5 ± 65.1 | 218.5 ± 83.3 | <0.01 |
| TNF-α, pg/ml | 1.65 (0.94–2.30) | 1.98 (1.38–2.57) | 0.02 |
| IL-6, pg/ml | 1.18 (0.78–1.84) | 1.29 (0.83–2.19) | 0.13 |
Data are expressed as means ± SD or medians (interquartile range, 25–75%) unless specified otherwise. OHAs = Oral hypoglycemic agents; RAS blocker = renin angiotensin system blocker; hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6 = interleukin-6.
Insulin users are excluded.
Factors associated with changes in HAI (∆HAI) and WBAI (∆WBAI) during the 3-year follow-up
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| correlation coefficient | p value | standardized β coefficient (SE) | p value | |
| ∆HAI | r2 = 0.388, p < 0.001 | |||
| ∆eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | −0.396 | 0.002 | −0.282 (0.007) | 0.022 |
| Age (years) | 0.377 | 0.003 | 0.213 (0.012) | 0.074 |
| DBP at base (mm Hg) | −0.297 | 0.020 | −0.096 (0.007) | 0.425 |
| ∆HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | −0.288 | 0.025 | −0.151 (0.007) | 0.461 |
| ApoE ε4 carrier | 0.277 | 0.031 | 0.285 (0.178) | 0.013 |
| Albuminuria during follow-up | 0.267 | 0.037 | 0.232 (0.120) | 0.038 |
| ∆WBAI | r2 = 0.295, p = 0.008 | |||
| ∆PWML grade | 0.306 | 0.016 | 0.196 (0.728) | 0.123 |
| Waist circumference at base (cm) | 0.299 | 0.020 | 0.214 (0.022) | 0.145 |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | 0.276 | 0.031 | 0.173 (0.027) | 0.223 |
| Treatment modality | 0.276 | 0.031 | 0.063 (0.445) | 0.694 |
| Retinopathy | 0.272 | 0.034 | 0.082 (0.307) | 0.578 |
| log CRP at base | 0.253 | 0.049 | 0.036 (0.403) | 0.797 |
| ∆SBI (number of infarcts) | 0.253 | 0.049 | 0.266 (0.697) | 0.031 |
Variables with p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into the multiple regression analysis. Retinopathy: 0 = none; 1 = simple; 2 = proliferative. Treatment modality: 0 = diet; 1 = oral hypoglycemic agents; 2 = insulin. DBP = Diastolic blood pressure; CRP = C-reactive protein.
Fig. 2Association between changes in HAI (ΔHAI) and changes in eGFR (ΔeGFR) and albuminuria during the 3-year follow-up. Albuminuria was divided into 3 categories during the follow-up period: normoalbuminuria or regression to normoalbuminuria from albuminuria (‘none’), progression to albuminuria from normoalbuminuria (‘newly detected’), and persistent albuminuria during the follow-up period (‘persistent’). Comparisons between the 3 groups were conducted by ANOVA (mean ± SE, p = 0.087).
Associations between HAI and WBAI at baseline and changes in cognitive function domains during the 3-year follow-up in elderly diabetic patients
| ∆MMSE score | ∆word recall score | ∆DSS test score | ∆Stroop test score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆immediate | ∆delayed | ||||
| Model 1 | −0.184 (0.113) | −0.161 (0.129) | −0.340 (0.095) | −0.080 (0.065) | 0.251 (0.155) |
| Model 2 | −0.228 (0.116) | −0.135 (0.132) | −0.348 (0.104) | −0.010 (0.074) | 0.233 (0.126) |
| Model 3 | −0.290 (0.143) | −0.155 (0.155) | −0.298 (0.106) | −0.089 (0.086) | 0.295 (0.152) |
| Model 1 | −0.035 (0.037) | −0.352 (0.040) | −0.429 (0.030) | −0.262 (0.022) | 0.032 (0.054) |
| Model 2 | −0.048 (0.047) | −0.379 (0.047) | −0.496 (0.037) | −0.234 (0.028) | 0.074 (0.055) |
| Model 3 | −0.002 (0.052) | −0.458 (0.134) | −0.471 (0.034) | −0.130 (0.029) | 0.062 (0.058) |
In the multivariate analysis, changes in cognitive function domains were used as the dependent variable. Values are standardized β and coefficients (SE).
p < 0.1,
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.005,
p < 0.001.
Model 1: no adjustment. Model 2: adjustment for age, sex, years of education, and each cognitive function domain at baseline. Model 3: adjustment for duration of diabetes, ApoE ε4 carrier, the mean of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and HbA1c during follow-up, eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, albuminuria, treatment modality (0 = diet, 1 = oral hypoglycemic agents, 2 = insulin), and current smoking (0 = no, 1 = yes) in addition to the factors in model 2.
Fig. 3Association of changes (Δ) in delayed word recall with HAI and WBAI at baseline.