| Literature DB >> 27293118 |
Sudharsana V Iyengar1, Janaki Balakrishnan2, Jürgen Kurths3.
Abstract
Periodic outbreaks of the larch budmoth Zeiraphera diniana population (and the massive forest defoliation they engender) have been recorded in the Alps over the centuries and are known for their remarkable regularity. But these have been conspicuously absent since 1981. On the other hand, budmoth outbreaks have been historically unknown in the larches of the Carpathian Tatra mountains. To resolve this puzzle, we propose here a model which includes the influence of climate and explains both the 8-9 year periodicity in the budmoth cycle and the variations from this, as well as the absence of cycles. We successfully capture the observed trend of relative frequencies of outbreaks, reproducing the dominant periodicities seen. We contend that the apparent collapse of the cycle in 1981 is due to changing climatic conditions following a tipping point and propose the recurrence of the cycle with a changed periodicity of 40 years - the next outbreak could occur in 2021. Our model also predicts longer cycles.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27293118 PMCID: PMC4904200 DOI: 10.1038/srep27845
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Limit cycles in favorable (large h values) and unfavorable (low h values) climatic conditions and different intrinsic growth rates λ of the budmoth.
For very good climatic conditions (large h values) limit cycles are born at very low values of growth rate λ, while for these to occur in unfavourable conditions, a much higher λ is required. The amplitude of the cycle is larger for a given λ when h is high. For instance, (a,b) could well represent the Tatra region, with low c values (low parasitoid efficiency/large intra-specific competition among budmoths): limit cycles appear only for higher values of h and λ. (c–f) could represent the Alpine region well: with large c, and limit cycles present even for low h and λ. (a) c = 2, λ = 2, (b) c = 2, λ = 6.5, (c) c = 12, λ = 2, (d) c = 6, λ = 2, (e) c = 6, λ = 3, (f) c = 12, λ = 5. Other parameters (for (a–f)): α = 0.5, m = 13, q = 1.13, q = 1.34.
Figure 2Relative frequency distributions of budmoth infestations return-time found using our model (in blue), with recorded data in ref. 1 (in red) and from Turchin’s model-2 (in (a)) and model-1 (in (b))(in green) (For Turchin’s models, his choice of parameter values: w = 0.17, α = 0.5, k = 250, c = 0.9, γ = 100, δ = 0.22, a = 2.5); for our model: (q = 1.13, q = 1.34, α = 0.5, c = 12, m = 13; h & s are varied from 0–1, and λ from 0–12). (c) 2-d q-deformed models comprising of either just budmoth-larch, or budmoth-parasitoid, do not yield the observed dominant cycle of 9-years. On the other hand, our model clearly captures this periodicity, explicitly validating the requirement of a deformed, tritrophic system. Differences of our model results from the Alpine data could indicate parameter regimes yet to be realised or observed.
Figure 3An example of (a) attracting and (b) repelling regions in the bifurcation diagrams in the Supplementary material movies, which suggest the presence of tipping points.