Literature DB >> 27293081

Detection of a case of chronic myeloid leukaemia with deletions at the t(9;22) translocation breakpoints by a genome-wide non-invasive prenatal test.

Katrien Janssens1, Kathleen Deiteren2, Anke Verlinden3, Liesbeth Rooms4, Sigri Beckers4, Philip Holmgren4, Katrien Vermeulen2, Marie-Berthe Maes2, Geert Mortier1,4, Bettina Blaumeiser1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPTs) interrogating the complete genome are able to detect not only fetal trisomy 13, 18 or 21 but additionally provide information on other (sub)chromosomal aberrations that can be fetal or maternal in origin. We demonstrate that in a subset of cases, this information is clinically relevant and should be reported to ensure adequate follow-up.
METHOD: Genome-wide NIPT was carried out and followed by a software analysis pipeline optimized to detect subchromosomal aberrations.
RESULTS: The NIPT profile showed deletions on chromosomes 9 and 22: NIPT 9q33.3q34.12(129150001-133750000)x1,22q11.23(23550001-25450000)x1,22q13.1(37850001-39600000)x1. This result was confirmed by single nucleotide polymorphism array on maternal genomic DNA, which also demonstrated that the deletions were somatic in nature. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed that the deletions were flanking the translocation breakpoint on the derivative chromosome 9 as the result of a t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) translocation with BCR-ABL1 fusion typical for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Multidisciplinary counselling, together with complete blood count, taught that the woman was in an early chronic phase CML. The woman was followed up closely, and treatment could be postponed until after delivery.
CONCLUSION: Genome-wide NIPT identified a CML in chronic phase caused by the typical t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) translocation and accompanied by deletions flanking the translocation breakpoints.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27293081     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

1.  Pregnant women with confirmed neoplasms should not have noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Liesbeth Lenaerts; Kristel Van Calsteren; Huiwen Che; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Effective Identification of Maternal Malignancies in Pregnancies Undergoing Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Jia Li; Jia Ju; Qiang Zhao; Weiqiang Liu; Yuying Yuan; Qiang Liu; Lijun Zhou; Yuan Han; Wen Yuan; Yonghua Huang; Yingjun Xie; Zhihua Li; Jingsi Chen; Shuyu Huang; Rufang Chen; Wei Li; Meihua Tan; Danchen Wang; Si Zhou; Jian Zhang; Fanwei Zeng; Nan Yu; Fengxia Su; Min Chen; Yunsheng Ge; Yanming Huang; Xin Jin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Discordant cfDNA-NIPT result unraveling a trisomy 12 chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a 37 years old pregnant woman.

Authors:  Niccolò Di Giosaffatte; Irene Bottillo; Luigi Laino; Giovanni Iaquinta; Alessandro Ferraris; Mariagrazia Garzia; Simone Bargiacchi; Claudia Mulargia; Maria Rosaria Angelitti; Fabiana Palumbo; Barbara Grammatico; Cinzia Bartolelli; Maria Giovanna Salerno; Luigi Rigacci; Paola Grammatico
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.242

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.