Literature DB >> 27292608

Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: stability of outcome over time.

O Hilly1, E Hwang2, L Smith2, D Shipp2, J M Nedzelski2, J M Chen2, V W Y Lin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation is the standard of care for treating severe to profound hearing loss in all age groups. There is limited data on long-term results in elderly implantees and the effect of ageing on outcomes. This study compared the stability of cochlear implantation outcome in elderly and younger patients.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of cochlear implant patients with a minimum follow up of five years was conducted.
RESULTS: The study included 87 patients with a mean follow up of 6.8 years. Of these, 22 patients were older than 70 years at the time of implantation. Hearing in Noise Test scores at one year after implantation were worse in the elderly: 85.3 (aged under 61 years), 80.5 (61-70 years) and 73.6 (aged over 70 years; p = 0.039). The respective scores at the last follow up were 84.8, 85.1 and 76.5 (p = 0.054). Most patients had a stable outcome during follow up. Of the elderly patients, 13.6 per cent improved and none had a reduction in score of more than 20 per cent. Similar to younger patients, elderly patients had improved Short Form 36 Health Survey scores during follow up.
CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation improves both audiometric outcome and quality of life in elderly patients. These benefits are stable over time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Cochlear Implants; Treatment Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27292608     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215116008197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  8 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors.

Authors:  Leire Garcia-Iza; Zuriñe Martinez; Ane Ugarte; Mercedes Fernandez; Xabier Altuna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Mitochondrial Gene Mutation: Decline in Speech Perception in Retrospective Long-Term Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Kai Kanemoto; Akinori Kashio; Erika Ogata; Yusuke Akamatsu; Hajime Koyama; Tsukasa Uranaka; Yujiro Hoshi; Shinichi Iwasaki; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26

3.  Cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults and elderly patients: analysis of audiometric and speech perception outcomes during the first year of use.

Authors:  S Ghiselli; S Nedic; S Montino; L Astolfi; R Bovo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 4.  The impact of rehabilitation on quality of life after hearing loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arjuna Brodie; Bethany Smith; Jaydip Ray
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Cochlear Implant Results in Older Adults with Post-Lingual Deafness: The Role of "Top-Down" Neurocognitive Mechanisms.

Authors:  Milena Zucca; Andrea Albera; Roberto Albera; Carla Montuschi; Beatrice Della Gatta; Andrea Canale; Innocenzo Rainero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The cost-effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implants in UK adults.

Authors:  Henry Cutler; Mutsa Gumbie; Emma Olin; Bonny Parkinson; Ross Bowman; Hafsa Quadri; Timothy Mann
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-11-02

7.  Long-term effects on the quality of life following cochlear implant treatment in older patients.

Authors:  Christian Issing; Svea Holtz; Andreas G Loth; Uwe Baumann; Johannes Pantel; Timo Stöver
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.236

8.  Prevalence, Characteristics, and Treatment Patterns of Hearing Difficulty in the United States.

Authors:  Hossein Mahboubi; Harrison W Lin; Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.