Literature DB >> 27291894

Stereotactic biopsy of brainstem lesions: 21 years experiences of a single center.

Johanna Quick-Weller1, Stephanie Lescher2, Markus Bruder3, Nazife Dinc3, Bedjan Behmanesh3, Volker Seifert3, Lutz Weise3, Gerhard Marquardt3.   

Abstract

Stereotactic biopsies are procedures performed to obtain tumor tissue for diagnostic examinations. Cerebral lesions of unknown entities can safely be accessed and tissue can be examined, resulting in correct diagnosis and according treatment. Stereotactic procedures of lesions in highly eloquent regions such as the brainstem have been performed for more than two decades in our department. In this retrospective study we focus on results, approaches, modalities of anesthesia, and complications. We performed a retrospective analysis of our prospective database, including 26 patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy of the brainstem between April 1994 and June 2015. All of the patients underwent preoperative MRI. Riechert-Mundinger-frame was used before 2000, thereafter the Leksell stereotactic frame was used. After 2000 entry and target points were calculated by using BrainLab stereotactic system. We evaluated histopathological results as well as further treatment; additionally we compared complications of local versus general anesthesia and complications of a frontal versus a trans-cerebellar approach. Median age of all patients was 33 years, and median number of tissue samples taken was 12. In all patients a final histopathological diagnosis could be established. 5 patients underwent the procedure under local anesthesia, 21 patients in general anesthesia. In 19 patients a frontal approach was performed, while in 7 patients a trans-cerebellar approach was used. Complications occurred in five patients. Thereby no significant difference was found with regard to approach (frontal versus trans-cerebellar) or anesthesia (local versus general). Stereotactic biopsies even of lesions in the brainstem are a save way to obtain tumor tissue for final diagnosis, resulting in adequate treatment. Approach can be trans-cerebellar or frontal and procedure can be performed either under local or general anesthesia without significant differences concerning complication rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brainstem lesion; Frontal approach; General anesthesia; Local anesthesia; Stereotactic biopsy; Trans cerebellar approach

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27291894     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2166-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  30 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative MR Imaging of Brain Tissue and Brain Pathologies.

Authors:  E Hattingen; A Jurcoane; M Nelles; A Müller; U Nöth; B Mädler; P Mürtz; R Deichmann; H H Schild
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  Diagnostic value and safety of stereotactic biopsy for brainstem tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1480 cases.

Authors:  Philipp Kickingereder; Peter Willeit; Thorsten Simon; Maximilian I Ruge
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques.

Authors:  Yi Lu; Cecil Yeung; Alireza Radmanesh; Robert Wiemann; Peter M Black; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Applicability and advantages of flow artifact-insensitive fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR sequences for imaging the posterior fossa.

Authors:  N Tanaka; T Abe; K Kojima; H Nishimura; N Hayabuchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Analysis of T2 signal intensity helps in the differentiation between high and low-grade brain tumours in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Stephanie Lescher; Ketan Whora; Dirk Schwabe; Matthias Kieslich; Luciana Porto
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  Stereotactic biopsy of brain stem masses: Decision analysis and literature review.

Authors:  Uzma Samadani; Sherman Stein; Gul Moonis; Seema S Sonnad; Pia Bonura; Kevin D Judy
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2006-11

7.  Elevated peritumoural rCBV values as a mean to differentiate metastases from high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Stella Blasel; Alina Jurcoane; Kea Franz; Gerald Morawe; Stefanie Pellikan; Elke Hattingen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Compared with Stereotactic Biopsy of Intra-axial Brain Lesions.

Authors:  Osama Abdelaziz; Mohamed Eshra; Ahmed Belal; Mohamed Elshafei
Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.268

9.  Efficacy and safety of local versus general anesthesia in stereotactic biopsies: a matched-pairs cohort study.

Authors:  Lutz M Weise; Markus Bruder; Sebastian Eibach; Volker Seifert; Christian Byhahn; Gerhard Marquardt; Matthias Setzer
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.956

10.  Magnetic resonance scans should replace biopsies for the diagnosis of diffuse brain stem gliomas: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

Authors:  A L Albright; R J Packer; R Zimmerman; L B Rorke; J Boyett; G D Hammond
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The potential of cerebrospinal fluid-based liquid biopsy approaches in CNS tumors.

Authors:  Austin K Mattox; Hai Yan; Chetan Bettegowda
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies for lesions of the brainstem-a series of 103 consecutive biopsies.

Authors:  Iulia Peciu-Florianu; Victor Legrand; Apolline Monfilliette-Djelad; Claude-Alain Maurage; Quentin Vannod-Michel; Serge Blond; Gustavo Touzet; Nicolas Reyns
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Management and outcome of pediatric brainstem and cerebellar peduncular low-grade gliomas: a retrospective analysis of 62 cases.

Authors:  Mohamed Reda Rady; Abd Elrhman Enayet; Amal Refaat; Hala Taha; Waleed Said; Eslam Maher; Mohamed A El Beltagy
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Roles and outcomes of stereotactic biopsy for adult patients with brainstem lesion.

Authors:  Henri Malaizé; Florence Laigle-Donadey; Maximilien Riche; Pauline Marijon; Karima Mokhtari; Franck Bielle; Suzanne Tran; Lucia Nichelli; Kevin Beccaria; Ahmed Idbaih; Khê Hoang-Xuan; Mehdi Touat; Alexandre Carpentier; Bertrand Mathon
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Indicators of correct targeting in stereotactic biopsy of intracranial lesions.

Authors:  Osvaldo Vilela-Filho; Jairo Porfírio; Lissa C Goulart
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-17

6.  Stereotactic Biopsy for Brainstem Lesions: A Meta-analysis with Noncomparative Binary Data.

Authors:  Lin He; Dongjie He; Yuhong Qi; Jiejing Zhou; Canliang Yuan; Hao Chang; Qiming Wang; Gaiyan Li; Qiuju Shao
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

7.  The Role of Stereotactic Frame-Based Biopsy for Brainstem Tumors in the Era of Molecular-Based Diagnosis and Treatment Decisions.

Authors:  Yudai Hirano; Yuki Shinya; Toshiya Aono; Hirotaka Hasegawa; Mariko Kawashima; Masahiro Shin; Hirokazu Takami; Shunsaku Takayanagi; Motoyuki Umekawa; Masako Ikemura; Tetsuo Ushiku; Kazuki Taoka; Shota Tanaka; Nobuhito Saito
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Outpatient stereotactic brain biopsies.

Authors:  Bertrand Mathon; Pauline Marijon; Maximilien Riche; Vincent Degos; Alexandre Carpentier
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Complications of stereotactic biopsy of lesions in the sellar region, pineal gland, and brainstem: A retrospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Xin Yu; Hulin Zhao; Weidong Cao; Hailong Li; Qinggang Li; Zhicaho Li; Feng Yin; Rui Liu; Jianning Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.