Literature DB >> 27291357

Where's Waldo? The utility of a complicated visual search paradigm for transcranial Doppler-based assessments of neurovascular coupling.

Jonathan D Smirl1, Alexander D Wright2, Kelsey Bryk3, Paul van Donkelaar3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The concept of neurovascular coupling has been postulated since the late 1800s and has been demonstrated most commonly in humans using visual stimuli (e.g. reading, checkerboards). These traditional paradigms evoke only a moderate cerebral blood flow response due to the relative simplicity of the visual stimuli. NEW
METHOD: Forty subjects completed three visual paradigms each challenging the visual processing areas to a different extent: reading text, complicated visual searching (new method: Where's Waldo) and viewing coloured dots. Posterior and middle cerebral artery (PCA, MCA) velocities were recorded using transcranial Doppler ultrasound during each visual paradigm.
RESULTS: Prior to the presentation of the visual stimuli there were no differences in mean arterial pressure, or PCA or MCA velocities for the three paradigms. All three paradigms led to an elevation in PCA and MCA velocities after a delay (∼1.1s). Whereas velocity elevation was consistent across the three paradigms in the MCA, it was markedly larger during the Where's Waldo task in the PCA. Thus, although the onset of the neurovascular coupling response was similar across the three visual paradigms, its overall magnitude was stimulus-dependent. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: Given that PCA velocity can be affected by blood pressure or carbon dioxide alterations, traditional neurovascular coupling paradigms (e.g. reading, checkerboards) appear to have a lower signal-to-noise ratio than that observed in complicated visual search tasks such as Where's Waldo.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend complicated visual search paradigms such as Where's Waldo be considered for future transcranial Doppler-based neurovascular coupling studies.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral blood flow; Functional hyperaemia; Neurovascular coupling; Posterior cerebral artery; Transcranial doppler ultrasound; Where’s Waldo

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27291357     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  5 in total

1.  Neurovascular coupling on trial: How the number of trials completed impacts the accuracy and precision of temporally derived neurovascular coupling estimates.

Authors:  Joel S Burma; Rowan K Van Roessel; Ibukunoluwa K Oni; Jeff F Dunn; Jonathan D Smirl
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.960

2.  Brain fog in postural tachycardia syndrome: An objective cerebral blood flow and neurocognitive analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Wells; Felix Paterson; Stephen Bacchi; Amanda Page; Mathias Baumert; Dennis H Lau
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-03-03

3.  Temporal evolution of neurovascular coupling recovery following moderate- and high-intensity exercise.

Authors:  Joel S Burma; Alannah Macaulay; Paige V Copeland; Omeet Khatra; Kevin J Bouliane; Jonathan D Smirl
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-01

4.  Does task complexity impact the neurovascular coupling response similarly between males and females?

Authors:  Joel S Burma; Rebecca M Wassmuth; Courtney M Kennedy; Lauren N Miutz; Kailey T Newel; Joseph Carere; Jonathan D Smirl
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-09

5.  The scalability of common paradigms for assessment of cognitive function: A functional transcranial Doppler study.

Authors:  Kannakorn Intharakham; Ronney B Panerai; Thompson G Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.