R B Govindan1, Srinivas Kota2, Tareq Al-Shargabi2, An N Massaro3, Taeun Chang4, Adre du Plessis2. 1. Division of Fetal and Transitional Medicine, Fetal Medicine Institute, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA. Electronic address: rgovinda@childrensnational.org. 2. Division of Fetal and Transitional Medicine, Fetal Medicine Institute, Children's National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA. 3. Division of Neonatology, Children's National - 111 Michigan Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA. 4. Division of Neurology, Children's National - 111 Michigan Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are often contaminated by the electrocardiogram (ECG) interference, which affects quantitative characterization of EEG. NEW METHOD: We propose null-coherence, a frequency-based approach, to attenuate the ECG interference in EEG using simultaneously recorded ECG as a reference signal. After validating the proposed approach using numerically simulated data, we apply this approach to EEG recorded from six newborns receiving therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy. We compare our approach with an independent component analysis (ICA), a previously proposed approach to attenuate ECG artifacts in the EEG signal. The power spectrum and the cortico-cortical connectivity of the ECG attenuated EEG was compared against the power spectrum and the cortico-cortical connectivity of the raw EEG. RESULTS: The null-coherence approach attenuated the ECG contamination without leaving any residual of the ECG in the EEG. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: We show that the null-coherence approach performs better than ICA in attenuating the ECG contamination without enhancing cortico-cortical connectivity. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that using ICA to remove ECG contamination from the EEG suffers from redistribution problems, whereas the null-coherence approach does not. We show that both the null-coherence and ICA approaches attenuate the ECG contamination. However, the EEG obtained after ICA cleaning displayed higher cortico-cortical connectivity compared with that obtained using the null-coherence approach. This suggests that null-coherence is superior to ICA in attenuating the ECG interference in EEG for cortico-cortical connectivity analysis.
BACKGROUND: Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are often contaminated by the electrocardiogram (ECG) interference, which affects quantitative characterization of EEG. NEW METHOD: We propose null-coherence, a frequency-based approach, to attenuate the ECG interference in EEG using simultaneously recorded ECG as a reference signal. After validating the proposed approach using numerically simulated data, we apply this approach to EEG recorded from six newborns receiving therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy. We compare our approach with an independent component analysis (ICA), a previously proposed approach to attenuate ECG artifacts in the EEG signal. The power spectrum and the cortico-cortical connectivity of the ECG attenuated EEG was compared against the power spectrum and the cortico-cortical connectivity of the raw EEG. RESULTS: The null-coherence approach attenuated the ECG contamination without leaving any residual of the ECG in the EEG. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: We show that the null-coherence approach performs better than ICA in attenuating the ECG contamination without enhancing cortico-cortical connectivity. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that using ICA to remove ECG contamination from the EEG suffers from redistribution problems, whereas the null-coherence approach does not. We show that both the null-coherence and ICA approaches attenuate the ECG contamination. However, the EEG obtained after ICA cleaning displayed higher cortico-cortical connectivity compared with that obtained using the null-coherence approach. This suggests that null-coherence is superior to ICA in attenuating the ECG interference in EEG for cortico-cortical connectivity analysis.
Authors: Jiri Vrba; Stephen E Robinson; Jack Mccubbin; Curtis L Lowery; Hari Eswaran; James D Wilson; Pamela Murphy; Hubert Preissl Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Jon E Tyson; Scott A McDonald; Edward F Donovan; Avroy A Fanaroff; W Kenneth Poole; Linda L Wright; Rosemary D Higgins; Neil N Finer; Waldemar A Carlo; Shahnaz Duara; William Oh; C Michael Cotten; David K Stevenson; Barbara J Stoll; James A Lemons; Ronnie Guillet; Alan H Jobe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip G Grieve; Joseph R Isler; Asya Izraelit; Bradley S Peterson; William P Fifer; Michael M Myers; Raymond I Stark Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: H Alexander; R B Govindan; T Anwar; V C Chirumamilla; I Fayed; R F Keating; W D Gaillard; C O Oluigbo Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2021-08-29 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Sarah B Mulkey; Laura Hitchings; Reva Persaud; Srinivas Kota; G Larry Maxwell; Robin Baker; Adre du Plessis; Rathinaswamy Govindan Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2021-03-14 Impact factor: 5.625
Authors: Sarah B Mulkey; Srinivas Kota; Rathinaswamy B Govindan; Tareq Al-Shargabi; Christopher B Swisher; Augustine Eze; Laura Hitchings; Stephanie Russo; Nicole Herrera; Robert McCarter; G Larry Maxwell; Robin Baker; Adre J du Plessis Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 4.379