W Bouaziz1,2, P O Lang3,4, E Schmitt1,2, G Kaltenbach1, B Geny2,5, T Vogel1,2. 1. Geriatric Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France. 2. Department of Physiology and EA-3072, Faculty of Medicine, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France. 3. Health and Wellbeing Academy, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK. 4. Geriatric and Rehabilitation Geriatric Division, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. 5. Functional Explorations Department, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ageing process is intrinsically associated with decline in physical endurance, muscle strength and gait ability and balance, which all contribute to functional disability. Regular physical training, and more particularly multicomponent training (MCT), has demonstrated many health benefits. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence of the health benefits of MCT including endurance training, muscle strengthening, balance exercises, and/or stretching (i.e. flexibility training) and/or coordination training in adults aged 65 years or over. METHODS: A comprehensive, systematic database search for manuscripts was performed in CINAHL Plus, Embase, Medline, PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Sport Discus and Web of Science using key words. For potential inclusion, two reviewers independently assessed all intervention studies published in English language from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2015. RESULTS: Of 2525 articles initially identified, 27 studies were finally included in this systematic review. They were all divided into five categories according to their main outcome measurements (cardio-respiratory fitness, metabolic outcomes, functional and cognitive functions and quality of life, QoL). These studies reported that MCT has a significant beneficial effect on cardio-respiratory fitness and on metabolic outcomes. Substantial improvement in functional and cognitive performance was also measured and a slighter but positive effect on QoL. CONCLUSION: Overall, this review demonstrates a positive effect of MCT with functional benefits and positive health outcomes for seniors. Based on this evidence, clinicians should encourage all adults aged 65 or over to engage in MCT programmes to favour healthy ageing and keeping older members of our society autonomous and independent.
BACKGROUND: The ageing process is intrinsically associated with decline in physical endurance, muscle strength and gait ability and balance, which all contribute to functional disability. Regular physical training, and more particularly multicomponent training (MCT), has demonstrated many health benefits. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence of the health benefits of MCT including endurance training, muscle strengthening, balance exercises, and/or stretching (i.e. flexibility training) and/or coordination training in adults aged 65 years or over. METHODS: A comprehensive, systematic database search for manuscripts was performed in CINAHL Plus, Embase, Medline, PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Sport Discus and Web of Science using key words. For potential inclusion, two reviewers independently assessed all intervention studies published in English language from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2015. RESULTS: Of 2525 articles initially identified, 27 studies were finally included in this systematic review. They were all divided into five categories according to their main outcome measurements (cardio-respiratory fitness, metabolic outcomes, functional and cognitive functions and quality of life, QoL). These studies reported that MCT has a significant beneficial effect on cardio-respiratory fitness and on metabolic outcomes. Substantial improvement in functional and cognitive performance was also measured and a slighter but positive effect on QoL. CONCLUSION: Overall, this review demonstrates a positive effect of MCT with functional benefits and positive health outcomes for seniors. Based on this evidence, clinicians should encourage all adults aged 65 or over to engage in MCT programmes to favour healthy ageing and keeping older members of our society autonomous and independent.
Authors: Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Kylie Teggart; Caroline Moore; Diana Sherifali; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Giulia Coletta; Stuart M Phillips; K Bruce Newbold; Elizabeth Alvarez; Ayse Kuspinar; Courtney C Kennedy; Pasqualina L Santaguida; Rebecca Ganann Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: David X Marquez; Susan Aguiñaga; Priscilla M Vásquez; David E Conroy; Kirk I Erickson; Charles Hillman; Chelsea M Stillman; Rachel M Ballard; Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard; Steven J Petruzzello; Abby C King; Kenneth E Powell Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Cauê V La Scala Teixeira; Alexandre L Evangelista; Jefferson S Novaes; Marzo E Da Silva Grigoletto; David G Behm Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Antônio Gomes de Resende-Neto; José Carlos Aragão-Santos; Bruna Caroline Oliveira-Andrade; Alan Bruno Silva Vasconcelos; Clodoaldo Antônio De Sá; Felipe José Aidar; Josimari Melo DeSantana; Eduardo Lusa Cadore; Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto Journal: J Aging Res Date: 2019-11-21