Hansjoerg Aust1, Sigmund Koehler2, Maritta Kuehnert2, Thomas Wiesmann3. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Philipps-University of Marburg UKGM StO. Marburg, Baldingerstrasse D-35033 Marburg, Germany. Electronic address: aust@staff.uni-marburg.de. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg UKGM StO. Marburg, Baldingerstrasse D-35033 Marburg, Germany. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Philipps-University of Marburg UKGM StO. Marburg, Baldingerstrasse D-35033 Marburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Left lateral table tilt of 15° to 30° is recommended for cesarean section, although little is known about the practical problems of its implementation. This study examines these issues from the perspective of anesthesiologists, obstetricians, theater nurses, and patients. Initially, the tilt was set by visual estimation in 100 women and checked by inclinometer afterwards. STUDY DESIGN: Observational survey. PATIENTS: One hundred women undergoing primary cesarean section. INTERVENTION: The anesthesiologist's initial estimated tilt setting was documented, then patient comfort and obstetrician's needs were assessed at 15°, and the tilt was adjusted accordingly. Problems were identified, and possible solutions were introduced. The effects of our solutions were reevaluated after 12months. RESULTS: Despite appropriate training, too little tilt was achieved in most cases. Even with objective inclinometry, complaints by patients, obstetricians, and theater nurses made physicians reluctant to press for 15° tilt. Better compliance was achieved by the introduction of a 2-step tilt procedure, side bar mounting, and inclinometry. After 12months, 96% of anesthesiologists were using the inclinometer to set at least 10°. Most observed an improvement in patient care. CONCLUSION: Implementation of 10° to 15° tilt requires objective inclinometry. It allows tilt adjustment to be made by interdisciplinary staff in greater confidence that patient comfort and surgical conditions will not be impaired. Strategies to reduce discomfort are presented in this article.
OBJECTIVE: Left lateral table tilt of 15° to 30° is recommended for cesarean section, although little is known about the practical problems of its implementation. This study examines these issues from the perspective of anesthesiologists, obstetricians, theater nurses, and patients. Initially, the tilt was set by visual estimation in 100 women and checked by inclinometer afterwards. STUDY DESIGN: Observational survey. PATIENTS: One hundred women undergoing primary cesarean section. INTERVENTION: The anesthesiologist's initial estimated tilt setting was documented, then patient comfort and obstetrician's needs were assessed at 15°, and the tilt was adjusted accordingly. Problems were identified, and possible solutions were introduced. The effects of our solutions were reevaluated after 12months. RESULTS: Despite appropriate training, too little tilt was achieved in most cases. Even with objective inclinometry, complaints by patients, obstetricians, and theater nurses made physicians reluctant to press for 15° tilt. Better compliance was achieved by the introduction of a 2-step tilt procedure, side bar mounting, and inclinometry. After 12months, 96% of anesthesiologists were using the inclinometer to set at least 10°. Most observed an improvement in patient care. CONCLUSION: Implementation of 10° to 15° tilt requires objective inclinometry. It allows tilt adjustment to be made by interdisciplinary staff in greater confidence that patient comfort and surgical conditions will not be impaired. Strategies to reduce discomfort are presented in this article.