Literature DB >> 27290688

Endovascular ultrasound for renal sympathetic denervation in patients with therapy-resistant hypertension not responding to radiofrequency renal sympathetic denervation.

Thomas Stiermaier1, Thomas Okon, Karl Fengler, Ulrike Mueller, Robert Hoellriegel, Gerhard Schuler, Steffen Desch, Philipp Lurz.   

Abstract

AIMS: Recent studies have reported a considerable number of non-responders after renal sympathetic de-nervation (RSD) with radiofrequency technology. Here we report our results of repeat RSD using ultrasound in these patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A cohort study was performed in patients who underwent ultrasound RSD after non-response to RSD with radiofrequency. Non-response was defined as mean daytime systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or a reduction of ≤10 mmHg in ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) ≥6 months after radiofrequency denervation. ABPM was recorded at baseline, post radiofrequency RSD as well as at three and six months post ultrasound RSD. A total of 24 non-responders underwent retreatment with the ultrasound device at a mean 15.3±8.2 months after radiofrequency RSD. Ultrasound RSD was performed successfully in all patients without severe adverse events. Mean daytime systolic blood pressure changed from 161.7±14.6 mmHg at baseline to 158.5±9.5 mmHg post radiofrequency RSD and to 150.5±10.4 mmHg and 151.6±11.0 mmHg at three and six months, respectively, post ultrasound RSD (p<0.01 with repeated measures analysis of variance). The main results of post hoc testing were as follows: baseline versus post radiofrequency RSD, p=0.83; baseline versus three months post ultrasound RSD, p=0.01; and baseline versus six months post ultrasound RSD, p=0.04.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound RSD appears to be safe and an effective therapeutic approach in patients not responding to previous RSD with radiofrequency technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27290688     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I2A43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Invasive treatment of hypertension : Update 2016].

Authors:  J Menne; R Wachter
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Renal sympathetic denervation in therapy resistant hypertension - pathophysiological aspects and predictors for treatment success.

Authors:  Karl Fengler; Karl Philipp Rommel; Thomas Okon; Gerhard Schuler; Philipp Lurz
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-26

Review 3.  Lessons Learned from RADIOSOUND-HTN: Different Technologies and Techniques for Catheter-based Renal Denervation and Their Effect on Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Philipp Lurz; Karl Fengler
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21

4.  Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes for Responders Versus Non-Responders Following Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension.

Authors:  Karl Fengler; Paul Reimann; Karl-Philipp Rommel; Karl-Patrik Kresoja; Stephan Blazek; Matthias Unterhuber; Christian Besler; Maximilian von Roeder; Michael Böhm; Steffen Desch; Holger Thiele; Philipp Lurz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Pulse Wave Velocity Predicts Response to Renal Denervation in Isolated Systolic Hypertension.

Authors:  Karl Fengler; Karl-Philipp Rommel; Robert Hoellriegel; Stephan Blazek; Christian Besler; Steffen Desch; Gerhard Schuler; Axel Linke; Philipp Lurz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.