Literature DB >> 27290686

Impact on outcome of different types of carotid stent: results from the European Registry of Carotid Artery Stenting.

Eugenio Stabile1, Giuseppe Giugliano, Alberto Cremonesi, Marc Bosiers, Bernhard Reimers, Carlo Setacci, Piergiorgio Cao, Andrej Schmidt, Horst Sievert, Patrick Peeters, Dimitrios Nikas, Anna Sannino, Gianmarco de Donato, Giambattista Parlani, Fausto Castriota, Marius Hornung, Paolo Rubino, Giovanni Esposito, Tullio Tesorio.   

Abstract

AIMS: Conflicting data exist on the impact on outcome of the use of different stent types during carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes according to different carotid stent design among the population of the European Registry of Carotid Artery Stenting (ERCAS). METHODS AND
RESULTS: The present study was conducted in 1,604 patients who underwent neuroprotected CAS in ERCAS. All types of commercially available carotid stent were used. Open-cell design stents were classified according to free cell area into <7.5 mm2 or >7.5 mm2. A total of 713 closed-cell, 456 hybrid-cell, 238 <7.5 mm2 open-cell, and 197 >7.5 mm2 open-cell stents were implanted. Overall, the 30-day stroke and death rate was 1.37%. At 30 days, 19 strokes occurred (1.18%): eight in the group of patients treated with a closed-cell (1.12%), two in those with a hybrid-cell (0.44%), three in those with a <7.5 mm2 open-cell (1.26%), and six in those treated with a >7.5 mm2 open-cell stent (3.05%) (p=0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: Data of the present study suggest that, in the setting of neuroprotected CAS performed in high-volume centres by properly trained operators, the use of an open-cell design stent with a free cell area >7.5 mm2 may be associated with an increased 30-day stroke risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27290686     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I2A41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  5 in total

Review 1.  Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting and Embolic Protection.

Authors:  Enrico Giordan; Giuseppe Lanzino
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  One swallow does not a summer make but many swallows do: accumulating clinical evidence for nearly-eliminated peri-procedural and 30-day complications with mesh-covered stents transforms the carotid revascularisation field.

Authors:  Piotr Musiałek; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.426

3.  Standard Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Artery Stenting with Closed-Cell Stent Design and Distal Embolic Protection: does the age matter?

Authors:  A Peluso; D Turchino; A Petrone; A M Giribono; R Bracale; L Del Guercio; U M Bracale
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2019-01-06

4.  Asymptomatic Cerebral Emboli Following Carotid Artery Stenting: A Diffusion-Weighted MRI Study

Authors:  Erkan Köklü; Şakir Arslan; Elif Sarıönder Gencer; Nermin Bayar; Çağın Mustafa Üreyen; Zehra Erkal; Ahmet Genç; Ramazan Güven; Oğuz Kaan Kaya; Muhammed Rıdvan Ersoysal
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.